ChiefsPlanet
Page 2 of 5 1 2 345
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Reid would have went for two (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=286724)

Molitoth 09-20-2014 11:45 AM
What a sack of shit.
This makes the midfield punt even worse.

beach tribe 09-20-2014 11:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prison Bitch (Post 10930556)
He wasn't going for 2. Fat Andy is one of the most terrified coaches I've ever seen. He kicked FG on 4th & goal at the 1 in both Denver and Indy last year. It's laughable he'd pull this act when we all know it's totally false
I have to say that similar circumstances in the past would indicate that he probably would have kicked it, but maybe he learned something from those failures.
Maybe not.

milkman 09-20-2014 11:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 10930651)
I have to say that similar circumstances in the past would indicate that he probably would have kicked it, but maybe he learned something from those failures.
Maybe not.
I don't believe that useless SOB is capable of learning.

beach tribe 09-20-2014 11:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuckdaddy (Post 10930586)
Terrible idea. Manning only needing a Field goal to win with a minute left. Better shot in OT because you at least get the ball.
Manning STILL would have gotten the ball with a minute left.....:spock:

beach tribe 09-20-2014 11:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman (Post 10930667)
I don't believe that useless SOB is capable of learning.
He hasn't seemed to learn from many of his failures. Like moving away from running the ball when it's working.
It repeatedly bites him in the ass, and yet......

notorious 09-20-2014 11:57 AM
Bull Shit.

SAUTO 09-20-2014 11:59 AM
I think he probably is telling the truth.


He onside kicked it on the opening ko against us once, then iirc in another game tried it again after the half...
Posted via Mobile Device

jd1020 09-20-2014 12:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mennonite (Post 10930760)
I assumed that the point of the timeout was to set up a second play if they got the TD. No other (good) reason to call one in that situation.
Why would they not use the TO to set that play up AFTER they scored a TD? What purpose would it make to call a TO to design the next next play?

Mennonite 09-20-2014 12:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 10930770)
Why would they not use the TO to set that play up AFTER they scored a TD? What purpose would it make to call a TO to design the next next play?

Because...I said something stupid and I got busted before I could delete it.

Iconic 09-20-2014 12:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 10930609)
but you want to trust that offense to score quick in overtime?


you want to trust our shitty defense to not give up a big play?
Neither option is ideal, I'm simply picking the one that maximizes our odds of winning. You can either pick option A in which you run one play and have virtually no margin of error, or option B where there is a greater margin of error and nothing is finite.

Considering our offense, B makes more sense.

highBOLTage 09-20-2014 12:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 10930677)
Manning STILL would have gotten the ball with a minute left.....:spock:
The sense of urgency is less obviously since if they are trailing they have to go all out, go on 4th down etc. which makes a FG more likely. If it is around 30 seconds, it makes more sense to go for 2. With Fox as opposing HC and a tie game, he probably runs out a tester play or two and if it fails he probably plays for OT.

Sweet Daddy Hate 09-20-2014 12:29 PM
Dick from stick = does not know, nor can see.

scho63 09-20-2014 12:32 PM
HE PUNTED ON 4TH AND 1 FOOT IN GOOD FIELD POSITION AND GAVE THE BALL BACK TO PEYTON AND HE SCORED!

HE WASN'T GOING FOR TWO-HE IS FULL OF SHIT!!!

TimBone 09-20-2014 12:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lonewolf Ed (Post 10930599)
No flipping way would he have gone for two when he didn't go for it on 4th and a foot from near midfield when the offense was moving the ball. No way.
Yep. This is exactly what I thought when I read the OP.

MTG#10 09-20-2014 12:52 PM
Vermeil would have went for two.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:35 PM.
Page 2 of 5 1 2 345
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.