Quote:
|
Quote:
UNC, DUKE and Syracuse are all teams I would want in a league over Clemson. I'll give you Pitt... I'm sorry but Clemson has always had an extremely over-inflated view of themselves. |
1. UNC
2. Clemson 3. Duke 4. Syracuse 5. Pitt |
1. UNC
2. Duke 3. Syracuse 4. Clemson 5. Pitt |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
They have a pretty good fanbase so no, they wouldn't hurt the conference. They just aren't nearly the name that UNC, Duke and Syracuse are. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Endowments: UNC - $2 Billion Duke - $4.8 Billion Syracuse - $850 Million Clemson - $382 Million |
In
|
Quote:
I assume the answer is no since you think it is some sort of proxy for university/athletic dept/conference stability. No one is making conference membership decisions based on endowments. Endowments don't generate TV revenue. |
DanBeebe Fake Dan Beebe
So Kansas every year, then RT @Rhyno_21: @DanBeebe last place finisher gets auto-bid to Beebe O'Beebe Bowl |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:53 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.