I agree. I fuckin DARE someone to say they don't want Terrell Owens on this team because of the "profile".

the profile talk comes from Vermeil himself ...




if you dont like it, take it up with him

Well that's a little different, TO is a real flamboyant guy who likes to bring attention to himself all the time... Porter's not like that, at least I haven't seen it.

That said, last time we went FA shopping for a WR we signed the best guy in the market coming off multiple 1000 yard seasons, who likes to do the worm in the endzone and spike the ball and scream every time he gets a first down....

So why add another #3 receiver?

Yeah. We can't have players bringing attention to themselves.

Porter can be our #2 guy easily.

I'm sorry, but I think Warren Sapp would have added something to this defense as well. Too bad he doesn't fit the profile either.

Because he's better than our current #1 and #2 receivers...

and vermeil said as much when ask whether they chiefs were interested in Sapp.


Tk can go into his normal denial shell all he wants, this "profile" crap comes from the very man he's defending.

So we'd have 3 #2 receivers?

can he play cornerback?

I realize that, but where does he say that Jerry Porter is not a WR that fits what he likes to do?
People just make stuff up implying that anybody who likes to dance and have fun and show off a bit doesn't fit "the profile"... and that the only guys who do are the little scrappy no-namers.

REP!

That's OK.


So what's the pay scale for a "#2" receiver with 13 TD's in 5 years and a history of injuries?


He just doesn't impress me.

I wholeheartedly agree. I think now is the time to replace Kennison and Morton with 2 27ish talented WRs. Porter and Givens (from NE) are my current choices. Givens will be a restricted free agent, but since he was a 7th round pick, he may not cost a heavy price.