ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Archives (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=11)
-   -   Familiar with the term "pink ballots" (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=10963)

aaaaa 11-30-2000 11:44 AM

BD,

Thanks for the reply. It showed me a lot about you and the self-described "non-partisan" Judicial Watch.

ChiefsAlltheWay 11-30-2000 11:45 AM

Bob Dole

How do you add pictures?? I got one in e-mail that is pretty funny.

Dr. Red 11-30-2000 11:48 AM

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Helvetica, verdana, ariel">quote:</font><HR> the problem with the duel is that no matter who won, their lawyers would contest it. . . <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
LOL, the image of democratic leadership hefting AlGore around, day after day, through a 4 year term [a la - Weekend at Bernie's].

"No, he's alive." [waving Al's hand] "Hello ladies."

Dr. Red 11-30-2000 11:50 AM

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Helvetica, verdana, ariel">quote:</font><HR> nobody at all interested in ending their suffrage? <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Morph - did you see Jimmy and Adam on 'The Man Show' on the street getting signatures to 'stop all the female suffraging?'<BR>

Misplaced_Chiefs_Fan 11-30-2000 11:54 AM

Just regular HTML, scooter.

milkman 11-30-2000 11:54 AM

JC - yeah, that is where the idea came from. I think I have watched parts of that show twice, and that is one piece I caught. I just have a feeling if they are too ignorant to use the butterfly ballot then they might sign up for this if we used the correct wording.

ChiefsAlltheWay 11-30-2000 11:55 AM

Check out this website...it's pretty good
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homep...s/PBballot.htm

milkman 11-30-2000 11:59 AM

Scooter - http://www.chiefsplanet.com/ubb/biggrin.gif

Logical 11-30-2000 11:59 AM

DT,
1. Show me where I said that.
2. If you read the entire page you see that they were ordered to use an independent firm to go over the ballots and it was their conclusion.
3.Are you insinuating that these pink ballots don't exist?.
4. Since you are accusing me of not being nuetral. You haven't said a word about the heavily democratic people making this re-count, but you are the first to point out that Juditial Watch might be bias. Where is your nuetrility (is that a word?) Where is your outrage at the dimpled ballots or our military boys not being able to vote?.How about Sore wanting to throw out some of the military vote on top of that?. Exactly. I am not a republican but I'll bet your a democrat.

BIG DADDY
Rests his case

Dr. Red 11-30-2000 12:01 PM

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Helvetica, verdana, ariel">quote:</font><HR> nuetrility (is that a word?) <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
I think I'm on safe ground in saying, NO.

Logical 11-30-2000 12:04 PM

JC,
Oh well, it sounded good http://www.chiefsplanet.com/ubb/smile.gif

DIEHARDCHIEF 11-30-2000 12:07 PM

For those who want to get politically active. 250 rallies this Saturday across the USA. This link has all of the cities and locations.

No More Gore!!
http://www.loudcitizen.com

Dan<BR>

Political Observer 11-30-2000 12:07 PM

Maintaining the neutrality necessary for the well-being of all parties involved, the Spelling Police will confirm that nuetrility is not a real word.

Logical 11-30-2000 12:10 PM

DanT,
BTW, judicial watch did go after Giuliani for illegal campaign contributions.

[This message has been edited by BIG_DADDY (edited 11-30-2000).]

aaaaa 11-30-2000 05:01 PM

testing...


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.