ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Ty Law : To the Jets, it's over. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=121064)

bobbything 08-08-2005 08:56 AM

Quote:

why's that funny? which of your wr's is going to be able to fight the law?
That's fine. Shut down Kennison. But, is Law going to cover Gonzalez and Holmes too?

I wouldn't be worried about shutting down KC's passing game. I'd be more concerned about keep the running game under 250 total yards.

Good luck.

alanm 08-08-2005 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by neckdemon
why's that funny? which of your wr's is going to be able to fight the law?

Doesn't matter who they throw at Law. No one shuts down the Chiefs passing game. Hell they don't even have to throw at Law. And if he plays they probably won't. And you know what's the beautiful part of it is? We have some of the leagues shittiest receivers. ROFL Al Saunders passing game is a thing of beauty to behold. And Green runs it to perfection. Imagine the numbers the Chiefs could rack up if we had some premier WR's?? It's all based on playing fast and timing. :thumb:

htismaqe 08-08-2005 09:20 AM

Guys, if our WR's don't step up, Ty Law COULD cover Tony Gonzales...

Am I the only person that remembers the first Denver game last year?

As for them keeping our running game in check, they do have Vilma in the middle.

Let's not cound our chickens before they hatch.

Nightfyre 08-08-2005 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alanm
Doesn't matter who they throw at Law. No one shuts down the Chiefs passing game. Hell they don't even have to throw at Law. And if he plays they probably won't. And you know what's the beautiful part of it is? We have some of the leagues shittiest receivers. ROFL Al Saunders passing game is a thing of beauty to behold. And Green runs it to perfection. Imagine the numbers the Chiefs could rack up if we had some premier WR's?? It's all based on playing fast and timing. :thumb:

Yeah.... We've taken out better, younger, healthier CBs.
*COUGH*
12-19-2004
*/COUGH*

RINGLEADER 08-08-2005 09:23 AM

I would've loved to have had Ty Law, but considering what they're paying him I'm glad we don't.

neckdemon 08-08-2005 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe
Guys, if our WR's don't step up, Ty Law COULD cover Tony Gonzales...

Am I the only person that remembers the first Denver game last year?

As for them keeping our running game in check, they do have Vilma in the middle.

Let's not cound our chickens before they hatch.


actually we have mcgraw to do that. just ask antonio gates how many passes he caught with mrgaraw on him. btw, im not saying its going to be an easy game, cause its not. i just think its going to come down to who has the more dominant defense, and i think we come out on top in that case. btw, if you guys want to talk some football at our site come onto www.jetsinsider.com .

Gaz 08-08-2005 09:28 AM

Sadly, it isn’t over...
 

The first time a WR makes a catch against us, the tsunami of “We Shoulda Signed Law” threads will crash the Planet server.

xoxo~
Gaz
Been around enough to know what comes next.

Nightfyre 08-08-2005 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by neckdemon
actually we have mcgraw to do that. just ask antonio gates how many passes he caught with mrgaraw on him. btw, im not saying its going to be an easy game, cause its not. i just think its going to come down to who has the more dominant defense, and i think we come out on top in that case. btw, if you guys want to talk some football at our site come onto www.jetsinsider.com .

If you think it has nothing to do with our offense, you'll be in for a surprise.

htismaqe 08-08-2005 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by neckdemon
actually we have mcgraw to do that. just ask antonio gates how many passes he caught with mrgaraw on him. btw, im not saying its going to be an easy game, cause its not. i just think its going to come down to who has the more dominant defense, and i think we come out on top in that case. btw, if you guys want to talk some football at our site come onto www.jetsinsider.com .

And that's why I like to keep my smack relevant.

If you HONESTLY think that Ty Law is going to contribute significantly to your defense being "dominant" in Week 1, I think you're going to be sorely disappointed.

neckdemon 08-08-2005 09:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightfyre
If you think it has nothing to do with our offense, you'll be in for a surprise.


thats not what i meant. i meant that i think our defense will shut down your offense enough so that our offense will outscore you. in other words i dont think your defense will be able to keep our offense from outscoring yours. base solely on the fact that i think our defense will keep your offense in check. of course you're going to see it the other way around, and i already said i dont think its going to be ab easy game. but if you trhink youre going to put 35 points on us i think you're going to be in for a surprise. my prediction: jets win 24-17.

htismaqe 08-08-2005 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by neckdemon
thats not what i meant. i meant that i think our defense will shut down your offense enough so that our offense will outscore you. in other words i dont think your defense will be able to keep our offense from outscoring yours. base solely on the fact that i think our defense will keep your offense in check. of course you're going to see it the other way around, and i already said i dont think its going to be ab easy game. but if you trhink youre going to put 35 points on us i think you're going to be in for a surprise. my prediction: jets win 24-17.

We may not put 35 up, but we're gonna score more than 17. Bank on it.

CoMoChief 08-08-2005 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by neckdemon
hello, jets fan here. guarantee you are wrong on this one. he WILL be our starting cb and he'll be shutting down your passing game come sept 11!


Hello, Chiefs fan here. No he will not shut down our passing game. Ty Law will not be as fast as he was in the beginning of last season. He relies on the 5 yard bump rule. Remember they made that rule strictly because of what he did in the 2003 AFC Championship game vs. the Colts. He's gonna get flagged all game long for having to hold on to WR's who are blowing by him. I doubt he has the confidence to go full speed either, especially when he knows he's gonna get hit.

Don't get me wrong though, I would have liked to have Ty Law, but only for a reasonable price. Law at 80% is better than any CB on our staff opposite of Surtain. The Jets probably paid him way more money than he's actually worth and he won't be around for another 3 years I bet. He just wanted his last paycheck before he retires because he already has the Super Bowl rings. What else does he need to prove other than that he wants the most he can get money wise before he hangs then up.

If Law gets hurt during the season. I will congrats Carl Peterson for not signing him. As far as you guys stopping our passing game, aint gonna happen. Sleeper WR = Craphonso Thorpe. He is gonna be a dangerous deep threat I bet this season. By next season, teams will have to account for his presence on the field.

neckdemon 08-08-2005 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe
And that's why I like to keep my smack relevant.

If you HONESTLY think that Ty Law is going to contribute significantly to your defense being "dominant" in Week 1, I think you're going to be sorely disappointed.

but it is relevant. lets say law shuts down kennison, thats one guy we basically dont have to worry about. if law can be put on an island with your #1 receiver and shut him down, it opens up our defense for a lot more blitzing. and our front 7 is VERY GOOD! also, fwiw, barrett is no slouch either. he totally eliminated plaxico burress form the game in the play-offs. so im betting he can take on your #2 receiver. that leaves alot of options for us to cover gonzalez. don't forget we have vilma also.

htismaqe 08-08-2005 09:38 AM

In 2001, Vermeil's first season, the Chiefs were held to less than 20 points 8 times.

Since then, they've scored less than 20 points 11 times...in 48 games. They've been held to 17 points or less just 9 times.

Uatu 08-08-2005 09:38 AM

We play teams whose corners can shut down our wideouts every week, and the offense is still at or near the top of the league in scoring. Adding a shutdown corner doesn't change much when the chumps you were starting before could do the job just as well.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.