![]() |
4.0 ypc isn't bad against the Pats D in NE. He's looked alright.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I thought Jordan looked okay.
The Raiders OL and DL has big problems. They couldn't pass rush at all and the OL wasn't creating any big holes for Jordan. |
I posted this very same thing 2 months ago. When did Lamont become so good. Alot was made of the Raiders getting him but he's nothing special.
|
Nah, he's ok, not a world beater but a solid starter. 1200 yds 7-10 tds. Good but not great.
|
Not too shabby against a top 10 D.
Rushing Oakland Rush Yds Avg Lng TD FumL L. Jordan 18 70 3.9 14 0 0 Receiving Rec Yds Avg Lng TD FumL L. Jordan 5 40 8.0 28 0 0 |
Jordan should probably get more than 1 game against the Pats in New England before we all judge if he's crap or not. It's probably going to take him a couple games to get use to being a starter seeing as he hasn't been one since college. Top that off with the Raiders Oline looking piss poor and well not many things were going his way.
I expect Jordan to be a solid, but unspectacular back nothing more nothing less. He won't be worth the contract the Raiders gave him so of course that will be amusing. |
I thought Jordan looked fine. He's more power than shake 'n bake. I mean, he's not a young Ricky Williams or anything, but he should be pretty solid for the g-d Faiders.
The Patriots running game, on the other hand. :shake: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The Pats D is strong, but one of their biggest strengths is gameplanning the opponent. They have no tape on the raiders. I saw a couple of things the raiders did that were successful that WILL NOT WORK in even 2 weeks. The first half, the Pats D was caught a little off guard. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:31 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.