Of course.

The Seahawks were obviously playing catch-up due to bad calls earlier in the game.

:D

Hello, Newman.

Being behind 7-3, 14-3 and 14-10 doesn't mandate abandoning the run.

Does it? :hmmm:

Well I did state that that particular call was more questionable. Regardless, Davis clearly pushed off. Was it enough to warrent the call? If you go by the rules, the answer is most definately yes.

Note the intentional smilie face.

It's called sarcasm, Jerry.

Don't worry, I picked up on it. You were laying it on pretty thick.

Just enjoying a healthy debate.

I look forward to many more.

And BTW, thanks.

I'm not sure I'd thank someone for referring to me as Jerry Seinfeld. Then again, you called me Newman.

Or George.

Thanks, Elaine.

The thanks was for the rep, but your version made for some laughs.

sorry, but you wont get any of that from Parker...

Fug you, bidge...

:thumb:

And don't forget the awful calls that went Indy's way in the Steelers/Indy game when Manning and Indy were the golden children. Kinda supports the theory. ;)

So are you saying the refs failed to change the outcome in Indy but had no problem changing the outcome in the SB?

And once more, if you are going to play conspiracy theorist, I wonder why no one is suggesting Jerramy Stevens was paid off? After all, he did more to ruin Seattle's chances than all the refs combined - and unlike the refs he IS a full time employee of the NFL.

I thought you were dead.