ChiefsPlanet
Page 2 of 25 1 2 345612 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Is Damon Huard likely to be the odd man out? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=142573)

Mr. Laz 06-21-2006 11:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jAZ
Isn't that impossible to do with a vet like Huard.
yes... check your sarcas-o-meter

jspchief 06-21-2006 11:46 AM
Will anyone even pick up Huard from our practice squad?

I'm willing to take my chances with Croyle and Printers.

Moooo 06-21-2006 11:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brock
Exposing Croyle to other teams that way would be pretty dumb.
Good point, perhaps he'll have to put Printers on the practice squad if for no reason to protect a future investment.

Moooo

JBucc 06-21-2006 11:47 AM
I like Gaz's idea. If we put Printers or Croyle on the practice squad someone will grab them but nobody wants Huard. He can just sit there until he retires or dies.

jAZ 06-21-2006 11:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moooo
I'd like a backup who's been with the system a few years. Sign Printers or Croyle to the practice squad. As a matter off fact, Croyle would be a perfect fit to the practice squad, as the main problem for most rookies is getting everything down, which he would be able to work on more than having to suit up.

Moooo
There's probably about a dozen teams that would cut their #3 QB in order to claim Croyle off our PS/waivers for their #3 spot. He'd be gone before Peterson could finish signing the paperwork.

Mr. Laz 06-21-2006 11:48 AM
you can't put a veteran like Huard on the practice squad.

JBucc 06-21-2006 11:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laz
you can't put a veteran like Huard on the practice squad.
Why not?

Hydrae 06-21-2006 11:48 AM
Maybe we can keep Printers on the roster as special teams/3rd string running back? :hmmm:

Hammock Parties 06-21-2006 11:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laz
you can't put a veteran like Huard on the practice squad.
Why not?

jspchief 06-21-2006 11:49 AM
True.

But would anyone even pick Huard up off the scrap heap?

jAZ 06-21-2006 11:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laz
yes... check your sarcas-o-meter
I took the Occam comment by Gaz to mean he was serious. But I'll give it a kick to be sure.

Moooo 06-21-2006 11:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JBucc
I like Gaz's idea. If we put Printers or Croyle on the practice squad someone will grab them but nobody wants Huard. He can just sit there until he retires or dies.
I'm kinda confused, is it not that necessary to have a player who has exposure to the system for a year or two? I mean, I saw what Green did his first season as a starter... I question if its always that way, or if a QB can usually step in.

This season, right now, I want Huard to be the one who comes in if Green is injured. I won't like it, but he knows the plays, which IMO is the most important aspect of the position.

Moooo

alpha_omega 06-21-2006 11:51 AM
Can/would they keep all 4?

Mr. Laz 06-21-2006 11:52 AM
Practice squad rules: Teams can have a maximum of eight players on the practice squad. The limit was increased by three in 2004. Players credited with two or more NFL seasons are ineligible. There is no restriction for age or last season in college.

jAZ 06-21-2006 11:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoChiefs
Why not?
See Section 4.
http://www.nflpa.org/media/main.asp?...Complete#art34


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:34 PM.
Page 2 of 25 1 2 345612 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.