ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Cleveland ****ed us (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=162108)

htismaqe 04-28-2007 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater
Croyle is a Project there is more chance for him to be a back QB then a NFL star.Brady on the other hand is a 50/50 he is the type of QB teams should be built around.

Brady Quinn will start Day 1. Just like Tim Couch.

PinkFloyd 04-28-2007 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater
lol how is QB not a position of need what if quinn becomes the next Joe montana,Quinn wasn't just another QB he was a position we should have built a franchise around.


The Chiefs will NEVER EVER develope a rookie QB as the "future".... We ALWAYS go after the "3-5 years of service left in the NFL" QB's....

Carl won't allow this franchise to ever pick in the top 15 or lower... He will always keep the team just good enough to make us contenders til the last game of the year --- but --- never good enough to win the whole damn thing....

oaklandhater 04-28-2007 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock
I don't think you understand what Cleveland gave Dallas.

I do understand Cleveland Way overpayed for what they got but ppl on here are acting like we shouldn't care because we have croyle and QB wasn't a need.

Tribal Warfare 04-28-2007 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe
Brady Quinn will start Day 1. Just like Tim Couch.


Ryan Leaf, Akilli Smith, Rick Mire, and Tod Blackledge

PinkFloyd 04-28-2007 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe
Brady Quinn will start Day 1. Just like Tim Couch.


Quinn will start for the Browns.... Carl would never let Herm start him though on Day 1...

htismaqe 04-28-2007 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater
I do understand Cleveland Way overpayed for what they got but ppl on here are acting like we shouldn't care because we have croyle and QB wasn't a need.

Croyle has a great chance to be successful in the NFL. He's been in the program for a year and added muscle (I've seen him).

Yes, we had a need at QB. Brady Quinn isn't the answer.

htismaqe 04-28-2007 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pinkfloyd
Quinn will start for the Browns.... Carl would never let Herm start him though on Day 1...

I think you missed my point.

Frosty 04-28-2007 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater
lol how is QB not a position of need what if quinn becomes the next Joe montana,Quinn wasn't just another QB he was a position we should have built a franchise around.

Quinn is more likely the next Rick Mirer, than Montana, IMO. I sure would have liked the extra picks, though. :(

oaklandhater 04-28-2007 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pinkfloyd
The Chiefs will NEVER EVER develope a rookie QB as the "future".... We ALWAYS go after the "3-5 years of service left in the NFL" QB's....

Carl won't allow this franchise to ever pick in the top 15 or lower... He will always keep the team just good enough to make us contenders til the last game of the year --- but --- never good enough to win the whole damn thing....

The way most fans acted when quinn was gone just proves my point chiefs fans love there team to be mediocre at best.

oaklandhater 04-28-2007 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe
Croyle has a great chance to be successful in the NFL. He's been in the program for a year and added muscle (I've seen him).

Yes, we had a need at QB. Brady Quinn isn't the answer.

He was more of the answer then Croyle hence why he was worth a 1st round pick.

Tribal Warfare 04-28-2007 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe
Yes, we had a need at QB. Brady Quinn isn't the answer.


Quinn gets happy feet, and flustered when things don't go his way, hence the errant passes against bigtime competition. The guy doesn't have that composure you expect. He's a phsyical specimen, but games aren't played in the weight room

Dr. Johnny Fever 04-28-2007 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater
lol how is QB not a position of need

Huard... Croyle... Green... there's a starter or two in there... hence, not a position of need.

Dr. Johnny Fever 04-28-2007 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater
if he dropped to 23 and we did not pick him in favor of a unproven QB in Croyle then carl is more stupid then I thought.

How exactly is Quinn proven?

oaklandhater 04-28-2007 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beer me
Huard... Croyle... Green... there's a starter or two in there... hence, not a position of need.

Green is done Huard is old and Croyle is more a ? mark then Quinn hence it was very much and still is a position of need.

Dr. Johnny Fever 04-28-2007 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater
He was more of the answer then Croyle hence why he was worth a 1st round pick.

And you know this how...?

You don't even know how to use punctuation.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.