She said "contacts", not legally blind.

It's not a matter of what she's wearing, but everyone knows men are pretty visual and if a girl makes no effort to impress, whether first meeting someone or whether you've been married to them for 30 years, then what are you telling the other person about your interest in them? Now I've only been married for 6 months, but I definitely do my best daily to look hot for him. I would think she'd try twice as hard. Not to mention that she's ten times hotter when she tries a little!!

post a picture

I just got a "woo" from this chick the other day. I'm scared:

http://www.okcupid.com/profile?u=Brittarded25

What does that mean?

I can see why. I'll bet she rates about a "20" on your drive around the block scale.

You send someone a "woo" if you're attracted to them.

I just hate to see the obsession with looks/clothing/style/etc; and go so far as to say you have to adhere to that to find a compatible mate. I was just trying to make a point that it doesn't have to be the deal breaker. If a few of those hollywood women would let themselves be seen in sweats, ponytail, & sans makeup, maybe it would save a young girl from the heartbreak realization of unobtainable "hollywood" beauty...

Sure, but that doesn't confirm the study's findings (that men don't value things other than looks; I'm not sure there was adequate time to determine that element).

Physically?

Yeah, I guess. That's my criteria for sending out woos. Although I don't send them out if the match percentage is below, say, 50.

Well for most men that have vision 3 minutes is about 2 minutes and 59 seconds more than we need.

For women it isn't anywhere near enough time unless the guy happened to drop his bank statement on the table.

Nothing else matters.

of her? hmmmm...I'm not sure I even have one... unless I steal it off her myspace or facebook...!!!