I think McFadden does fall to 4....Peterson fell to 7. If your team is really really shitty it's not worth it to take a RB with a top 3 pick.

Yeah..like he'd ever be able to get past our line anyways..

Oh, wait. It's not 2003 anymore.

Just a tiny bit of sarcasm in that post.

I see, we would take a stud RB while our line sucks and be stuck paying LJ his 100 billion dollar contract. Another awesome move by this franchise.

Shew.. thanks.

The point isn't that the Chiefs should take him, the point is that he is the safest of any pick.

Cutler intercepted again!

LMAO

GO RAIDERS

More than likely. If nothing else we'd hold him hostage for more picks.

You think he's going #1? Because the way things are headed, the Chiefs could end up #2.

Oh that's fine then, but to me if a team like the Jets took him over Chris Long I'd consider it a stupid pick. They'd win a couple more games but wouldn't really compete and then he'd be done in 5 years and that's being generous.

I think he's gonna end up on the Pats...scary.

He might be referring to the fact of the Patriots owning the 49er's first round pick in 2008. The rich get richer.

I suppose I was pinning us somewhere in the 5-7 range.

With the Rams, Dolphins, Jets, Raiders, Falcons, 49ers and possibly a few others under or above us.

17-7, Oakland!

THE AUTUMN WIND IS A RAIDER!

BLOWING DOWN THE DRAFT BOARD!

This is hilarious.....lets cheer for all the bad teams to win, other than Miami because that's to unrealistic.

Hell yeah, plus I don't thin mathematically catch Miami with the tiebreakers.