ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Royals JoPo: Beltran Blossomed in KC (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=187653)

Demonpenz 07-23-2008 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by markk (Post 4862817)
Can you guys name a single Boras client who's ever said he wanted to test free agency and then resigned at any price?

And for those of you scoring at home, Beltran is hitting .268 as of today, and will be paid $18.6 million this season. In fact he's never hit anywhere close to .300 since leaving the Royals, even with the benefit of a lot more protection in the lineup. And obviously, he hasn't come up in the post season for the Mets.

You could definitely make the argument that Beltran has failed to meet expectations in New York, and as popular as he is, he's significantly overpaid. It's not good value for the Mets to be devoting 15% of their payroll to him and they are the 2nd highest payroll in baseball. In Kansas City he'd be closer to a quarter of it.

Not good value. The Royals could spend that 20 on a couple of good starting pitchers or a couple of good bats in the lineup. You might be able to get two similar players for that.


Plus with the without teahen and buck we may loose upto 96 games

DeezNutz 07-23-2008 09:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by markk (Post 4862817)
. The Royals could spend that 20 on a couple of good starting pitchers or a couple of good bats in the lineup. You might be able to get two similar players for that.

Who? Name a good position player that any team, particularly the Royals, could acquire for around 10 mil. Now name a second.

I'm not even going to discuss getting high-quality starting pitching for that amount.

markk 07-23-2008 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 4862887)
Who? Name a good position player that any team, particularly the Royals, could acquire for around 10 mil. Now name a second.

I'm not even going to discuss getting high-quality starting pitching for that amount.

So every good position player in the majors makes 15 million? A fairly reliable starting pitcher will make about 10.

I'm not talking about superstars. Just worthy everyday players.

teedubya 07-23-2008 09:41 AM

This makes me sick.

DeezNutz 07-23-2008 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by markk (Post 4862900)
So every good position player in the majors makes 15 million? A fairly reliable starting pitcher will make about 10.

I'm not talking about superstars. Just worthy everyday player

No, but once players hit FA they're grossly overvalued, as you know. That's why I wanted you to specify whom you'd like to see the team sign.

For example, I consider Guillen to be a steady, everyday player, not a superstar, and 10 mil. probably wouldn't have brought him here, even with all of his baggage.

Pitching is even more of a joke. In today's market, I think that 10 might, might get you a #4 or #5 starter, and the Royals seem to have plenty of those.

markk 07-23-2008 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 4862929)
No, but once players hit FA they're grossly overvalued, as you know. That's why I wanted you to specify whom you'd like to see the team sign.

For example, I consider Guillen to be a steady, everyday player, not a superstar, and 10 mil. probably wouldn't have brought him here.

Pitching is even more of a joke. In today's market, I think that 10 might, might get you a #4 or #5 starter, and the Royals seem to have plenty of those.

Ok, so Guillen is performing similarly and making $12 million and not $10 million. Sorry. I don't know why we're quibbling about that.

The point of it all was that Beltran is a nice player but is grossly overpaid and his best years (like 2003) were in Kansas City and seem like they might be behind him.

DeezNutz 07-23-2008 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by markk (Post 4862941)
Ok, so Guillen is performing similarly and making $12 million and not $10 million. Sorry. I don't know why we're quibbling about that.

The point of it all was that Beltran is a nice player but is grossly overpaid and his best years (like 2003) were in Kansas City and seem like they might be behind him.

I really don't care if he's overpaid. I wish like hell the Royals had given him the money to stay because he's more than a nice player. I'm sick of the Emil Browns of the world.

If you believe '03 was Beltran's best. Here's his line, part of it:
2003: .307 26 HR 100 RBI

In NY, he's been solid:
2005: .266 16 HR 78 RBI
2006: .275 41 HR 116 RBI
2007: .276 33 HR 112 RBI

Obviously we all know what he brings defensively. My point is that Beltran can't be the ONLY good player on a team--he's not the world's greatest anything--but he's certainly the quality of player that I'd always like to have on my team. It amazes me how many people care about Glass's bank account. **** him. Spend the money. Get good players.

Deberg_1990 07-23-2008 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 4862965)
I really don't care if he's overpaid. I wish like hell the Royals had given him the money to stay because he's more than a nice player. I'm sick of the Emil Browns of the world.

If you believe '03 was Beltran's best. Here's his line, part of it:
2003: .307 26 HR 100 RBI

In NY, he's been solid:
2005: .266 16 HR 78 RBI
2006: .275 41 HR 116 RBI
2007: .276 33 HR 112 RBI

Obviously we all know what he brings defensively. My point is that Beltran can't be the ONLY good player on a team--he's not the world's greatest anything--but he's certainly the quality of player that I'd always like to have on my team. It amazes me how many people care about Glass's bank account. **** him. Spend the money. Get good players.


Well said. Todays game sucks. Nothing pisses me off more than losing a home grown talented player.

If Brett were a Royal today he would have only lasted 4 season in KC.

DeezNutz 07-23-2008 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 4862982)
If Brett were a Royal today he would have only lasted 4 season in KC.

You're right that this would have been the case for the past 15 years or so.

I'm more hopeful now than I've been in a long time that the Royals organization is going to make a legit. effort to win, and this is because of this year's draft, particularly the selection of Melville in the 4th round.

This kid reportedly wanted huge money, around 1.5 mil. to sign (which is off the charts with respect to the slotting system at this point in the draft) and the team still took him, after selecting Hosmer, who also supposedly wants big-time cash.

This is what "real" teams have done for years. It's cool that KC has decided to play ball, finally. ****ing Glass you worthless sack of monkey shit.

markk 07-23-2008 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 4862965)
I really don't care if he's overpaid. I wish like hell the Royals had given him the money to stay because he's more than a nice player. I'm sick of the Emil Browns of the world.

If you believe '03 was Beltran's best. Here's his line, part of it:
2003: .307 26 HR 100 RBI

In NY, he's been solid:
2005: .266 16 HR 78 RBI
2006: .275 41 HR 116 RBI
2007: .276 33 HR 112 RBI

Obviously we all know what he brings defensively. My point is that Beltran can't be the ONLY good player on a team--he's not the world's greatest anything--but he's certainly the quality of player that I'd always like to have on my team. It amazes me how many people care about Glass's bank account. **** him. Spend the money. Get good players.

His batting average is down 40 points. Without looking, he's not stealing bases like he did either.

The point of that post before I got carried away is that a lot of reeruns think we could have put 15 mil in front of him and he would have stayed. He was not resigning. They said it over and over. Now it sounds like he looks back and remembers good times here, but that doesn't mean he was going to walk away from 20 million more over 4 or 5 years to stay. It's ridiculous.

I'm glad Kansas City is spending money now for their sake, but the Mets are spending almost $150 million this year. What is another million or two on top of that to outbid them for whoever it is they want? If a team like the Yankees or Mets wants a free agent and KC does too, they will be in New York no matter how willing Glass is to pay up to market.

DeezNutz 07-23-2008 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by markk (Post 4863004)
If a team like the Yankees or Mets wants a free agent and KC does too, they will be in New York no matter how willing Glass is to pay up to market.

That's probably going to be largely true. That's why teams like the Royals have to identify talent early and be willing to spend the money when the player is young, a la Soria. Great deal. Same thing should have happened with Beltran. The organization should have never allowed him to get to the final year of his contract.

Sometimes this process causes a team to get burned. Look at the Berroa deal. But I'm more than willing to take this chance, as long as ownership realizes that sometimes a team has to eat a contract or two. Sometimes shit happens. No organization should sit around, throwing up its hands, over a Sweeney signing, for example. People bitched about this for years, like the problem was the player. He got paid. Good for him. The problem wasn't Sweeney. The problem was that he was the only decent talent on an otherwise joke of a team, and, when he broke down, KC was really in a jam.

My final thought on this is that it will be important to worry about how much a player is really worth once the Royals' payroll gets into a competitive range. Don't spend to spend, but identify a target and go get him. This is why I wanted Hunter, and I didn't give a shit if the Royals overpaid by 1 or even 5 mil. Who cares?

The Cardinals should be the model for the Royals. Once we get there, then saying we shouldn't spend X on player X is more logical. Right now, we need all the ****ing talent we can get. Glass's bank account is the least of my concerns.

Dartgod 07-23-2008 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by markk (Post 4863004)
His batting average is down 40 points. Without looking, he's not stealing bases like he did either.

The point of that post before I got carried away is that a lot of reeruns think we could have put 15 mil in front of him and he would have stayed. He was not resigning. They said it over and over. Now it sounds like he looks back and remembers good times here, but that doesn't mean he was going to walk away from 20 million more over 4 or 5 years to stay. It's ridiculous.

I'm glad Kansas City is spending money now for their sake, but the Mets are spending almost $150 million this year. What is another million or two on top of that to outbid them for whoever it is they want? If a team like the Yankees or Mets wants a free agent and KC does too, they will be in New York no matter how willing Glass is to pay up to market.

Exactly. Royals fans should not be pissed that we let Beltran go. We should be pissed because for two decades we failed to develop a minor league system that could replace talent that decided to leave for the Yankees, Red Sox, and other high payroll rosters.

That's where Glass really failed this organization.

beavis 07-23-2008 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dartgod (Post 4863023)
Exactly. Royals fans should not be pissed that we let Beltran go. We should be pissed because for two decades we failed to develop a minor league system that could replace talent that decided to leave for the Yankees, Red Sox, and other high payroll rosters.

That's where Glass really failed this organization.

You are correct sir. I will never bash Glass for not overpaying for players, but what has happened to our farm system is a travesty. At least it's headed in the right direction now, but it's still going to take years to fix it.

markk 07-23-2008 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dartgod (Post 4863023)
Exactly. Royals fans should not be pissed that we let Beltran go. We should be pissed because for two decades we failed to develop a minor league system that could replace talent that decided to leave for the Yankees, Red Sox, and other high payroll rosters.

That's where Glass really failed this organization.

Actually, the team was a full rotten disaster already when Glass took it over. Robinson had been GM since 1991.

The decline started with free spending toward the end of Mr. Kauffman's life on players that didn't work out. The minor league system was in decline though, for sure.

The death knell was the strike in 94 - the team was going to the postseason that year possibly. They lost 90 games in 1992 but were 13 games over .500 in 1994 when the strike happened. Then Herk Robinson decided to fire McRae for this and bring in Bob Boone, who promply returned the team to 90+ loss territory.

If people hate Jack Steadman, well, Herk Robinson is just like him.

DeezNutz 07-23-2008 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dartgod (Post 4863023)
Exactly. Royals fans should not be pissed that we let Beltran go. We should be pissed because for two decades we failed to develop a minor league system that could replace talent that decided to leave for the Yankees, Red Sox, and other high payroll rosters.

That's where Glass really failed this organization.

Agreed. What happened to the farm system was a travesty.

Why would you not want to retain a very talented player? He should have never seen the final year of his contract. At some point, it can't be a constant rebuild.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.