ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Velbon: Without Brady the Patriots are.... (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=190586)

DaKCMan AP 09-04-2008 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HC_Chief (Post 4977891)
Probably.

Their OLine and Receivers too.

KC has better RBs.

We have a better punter and TE too!

HC_Chief 09-04-2008 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 4977937)
We have a better punter and TE too!

D'OH! I sincerely apologize to Colquitt!!one!!eleven!

That dude is the best punter in the league. Seriously, if there was one position on this team that is absolutely set, w/o doubt, it is punter.

Tony G is better too. He's not the #88 we used to know & love, but he's still one of the best. I feel bad for him; wish he could get a ring.

boogblaster 09-04-2008 09:40 AM

KC by 3 ... print it ...

HC_Chief 09-04-2008 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boogblaster (Post 4977963)
KC by 3 ... print it ...

Lose by three TDs? Got it. ;)

Rausch 09-04-2008 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vanilla Thunder (Post 4977868)
That Pats could still beat us without Brady. .

No, they couldn't.

It won't matter though because he'll play and finish...

DaKCMan AP 09-04-2008 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HC_Chief (Post 4977954)
D'OH! I sincerely apologize to Colquitt!!one!!eleven!

That dude is the best punter in the league. Seriously, if there was one position on this team that is absolutely set, w/o doubt, it is punter.

Tony G is better too. He's not the #88 we used to know & love, but he's still one of the best. I feel bad for him; wish he could get a ring.

There are 17 million + reasons I don't feel too bad for him.

Rausch 09-04-2008 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 4977980)
There are 17 million + reasons I don't feel too bad for him.

Save envy give me 2...

Kerberos 09-04-2008 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 4977971)
No, they couldn't.

It won't matter though because he'll play and finish...

I believe the Pats could beat the Chiefs even if Brady was limping and had one ARM tied behind his back.

:shake: sad but true.

HC_Chief 09-04-2008 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 4977980)
There are 17 million + reasons I don't feel too bad for him.

He's got his money; the one thing he'll never have is a ring. Unless, of course, he buys one. ;)

DaKCMan AP 09-04-2008 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HC_Chief (Post 4978001)
He's got his money; the one thing he'll never have is a ring. Unless, of course, he buys one. ;)

He's got October too. ;)

Given the choice, I'd take lifetime financial security over a championship ring. Sure, it'd be nice for All-Pro's like him who stick with the same team throughout an entire career to win in the post-season, but I'm not going to :deevee: if he doesn't.

HC_Chief 09-04-2008 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 4978094)
He's got October too. ;)

Given the choice, I'd take lifetime financial security over a championship ring. Sure, it'd be nice for All-Pro's like him who stick with the same team throughout an entire career to win in the post-season, but I'm not going to :deevee: if he doesn't.

Is October his "life partner"? (jeez, what a frigging ghey Kalifornia notion)

re: " I'd take lifetime financial security over a championship ring", I'd want both. The former is a given if you're a talent such as TG; the latter is why you play the game. To spend a decade plus in the purpose of a goal, only to fall far short would grind on you for the rest of your life. "Yeah, I made moneay and set personal goals and records, but I never won a big game. I never even made it close to the championship. I was a star for a loser franchise."

beach tribe 09-04-2008 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HC_Chief (Post 4978107)
Is October his "life partner"? (jeez, what a frigging ghey Kalifornia notion)

re: " I'd take lifetime financial security over a championship ring", I'd want both. The former is a given if you're a talent such as TG; the latter is why you play the game. To spend a decade plus in the purpose of a goal, only to fall far short would grind on you for the rest of your life. "Yeah, I made moneay and set personal goals and records, but I never won a big game. I never even made it close to the championship. I was a star for a loser franchise."

His career is not over yet. Maybe he can get some big wins.

****. You're killin me.

KCrockaholic 09-04-2008 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vanilla Thunder (Post 4977868)
That Pats could still beat us without Brady. That's how bad we are.

I really dont see how so many people think the Chiefs are that bad. i swear you all have lowered your expectations to maybe a 2 win season, so when we win 6 or so it can be like a superbowl party. It would just be nice to see a little faith and hope from our fans...and for thoes that want us to tank this season, that is ridiculous. if we go 3-13, we would have made zero progress, and this re-building thing we have to be done again because Herm would be fired, and we would have to start from scratch again with a new coach. it would only set us back further. so lets hope for a year of 7-9 or 8-8 atleast.

Basileus777 09-04-2008 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vanilla Thunder (Post 4977868)
That Pats could still beat us without Brady. That's how bad we are.

They could also lose to us. That's how bad Matt Cassell is.

RealSNR 09-04-2008 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vanilla Thunder (Post 4977868)
That Pats could still beat us without Brady. That's how bad we are.

Dude, this is a bullshit argument. The Pats could beat a LOT of teams without Brady.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.