ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Gretz: Why Thigpen Is Starting (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=191919)

OnTheWarpath15 09-18-2008 08:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 5031022)
I don't know how you keep going with Thigpen when Woodson is on the Giants practice squad.

I don't know why people keep calling for the Chiefs to sign Woodson, when they had 10 opportunities to draft him, and passed.

They obviously have no interest.

OnTheWarpath15 09-18-2008 08:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ari Chi3fs (Post 5030906)
Id rather have Casey Printers instead of Thigpen starting... Printers was doing decent last preseason.

Really?

Go look at Casey's stats in the CFL this year.

8 games, 3 TD's, 9 INT's, 5 fumbles and a QB rating of 64.

KCJohnny 09-18-2008 08:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5031032)
I don't know why people keep calling for the Chiefs to sign Woodson, when they had 10 opportunities to draft him, and passed.

They obviously have no interest.

Woodson would probably be an upgrade.

ChiefsCountry 09-18-2008 08:06 AM

Last week everybody was calling for Thigpen to start, oh how things change.

KCJohnny 09-18-2008 08:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 5031044)
Last week everybody was calling for Thigpen to start, oh how things change.

ROFL

How true!

Chiefnj2 09-18-2008 08:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5031032)
I don't know why people keep calling for the Chiefs to sign Woodson, when they had 10 opportunities to draft him, and passed.

They obviously have no interest.

They are obviously reeruned in terms of their QB plans.

OnTheWarpath15 09-18-2008 08:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCJohnny (Post 5031040)
Woodson would probably be an upgrade.

Are you serious, or are you TRYING to embarrass yourself?

OnTheWarpath15 09-18-2008 08:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 5031052)
They are obviously reeruned in terms of their QB plans.

While this may be true, it doesn't mean that Woodson is the QB everyone thought he'd be.

He dropped to the 6th round for a reason, and he couldn't beat out Anthony Wright and David Carr for a roster spot.

Anthony Wright.

David Carr.

Argument over.

Chiefnj2 09-18-2008 08:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5031060)
While this may be true, it doesn't mean that Woodson is the QB everyone thought he'd be.

He dropped to the 6th round for a reason, and he couldn't beat out Anthony Wright and David Carr for a roster spot.

Anthony Wright.

David Carr.

Argument over.

Tyler Thigpen and Marques Hagans, argument over.

OnTheWarpath15 09-18-2008 08:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 5031086)
Tyler Thigpen and Marques Hagans, argument over.

Yet they are on a roster, while not a single NFL team has signed Woodson, though they've ALL had, and continue to have the opportunity.

Chiefnj2 09-18-2008 08:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5031093)
Yet they are on a roster, while not a single NFL team has signed Woodson, though they've ALL had, and continue to have the opportunity.

I didn't realize every other team had their top 2 QB's knocked out with injuries and hadn't planned as well as KC.

OnTheWarpath15 09-18-2008 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 5031102)
I didn't realize every other team had their top 2 QB's knocked out with injuries and hadn't planned as well as KC.

They signed Ingle Martin when they had the chance to sign Woodson.

Burn your candle for Woodson somewhere else. Or, keep pounding a drum no one is interested in listening to.

Christ, your mancrush on Woodson is worse than Clayton's for Huard...

Chiefnj2 09-18-2008 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5031113)
They signed Ingle Martin when they had the chance to sign Woodson.

Burn your candle for Woodson somewhere else. Or, keep pounding a drum no one is interested in listening to.

Christ, your mancrush on Woodson is worse than Clayton's for Huard...

I've mentioned Woodson maybe three times. Keep sticking up for Herm.

bobbything 09-18-2008 08:38 AM

None of this matters because Michael Turner is going to run for 200 yards on us.

OnTheWarpath15 09-18-2008 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 5031123)
I've mentioned Woodson maybe three times. Keep sticking up for Herm.

Do you READ this board?

Or do you just assume that anyone that wants Huard to ride the ****ing pine is a Herm supporter?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.