Well, I hope he's telling the truth about Albert and not just piping sunshine our asses like he did last year with Larry.

At this point, Huard is a more quality QB than Brodie. He simply makes more plays.


Not a Huard lover, but hes a decent game manager. Hes not as bad as alot of Chiefs fans think.

Out first draft pick next year, simply must be a QB. This shouldnt even be an argument.

Well, if they've truly decided that Croyle isn't the guy and they're gonna draft their QB then it doesn't matter. If they still believe Croyle is the guy, he must play.

Agreed on all points.

I don't think we've seen enough of Brodie to really say that.

IM still trying to figure out why they call a different game plan with Brodie in there? Im guessing they dont trust his decision making.

Well, a huge part of it is being able to stay on the field. If he could, we would have seen enough to make that decision.

Like I said, I'd still start Brodie when he's ready. If he gets hurt again though... I'm ready to move on.

No I think Croyle should start when healthy, though we are pretty sure what we have in him, we have to find out for sure.

Maybe my post wasn't the clearest. Herm was tyring to say that there might be a QB controversy after the bye week if Huard plays good. Of course Herms "good" and the rest of the worlds "good" are light years apart.

I'm right there with you. I'm patient but I have my limits.

I see what you're saying and I believe Croyle will get the start over Huard if he is "healthy"
But if we were trying to win games, Huard would be starting.

Let me also say that Huard is not the QB that Brodie is, but Brodie can not stay healthy. If anyone has ever went and watched these guys in training Camp........bring your umbrella huards passes are so high, some could bring rain. Croyle is also more accurate. They call the game different when he is in there and that needs to change. He has to have the chance to succeed or fail.

I dont get it?? In that New England game, after Brodie went down, Huard went down the field and scored a TD.

Is it because they changed the play calls? Or is it because Huard can read a defense better?

Well, by all rights, he should... That's a product of experience.

I think it is different play calls. Huard locks onto receivers alot, and goes down alot or takes the check down when any pressure occurs, so I don't think that he reads the D better. In Croyles defense, he had a lot of dropped passes that could have changed how we thought of him in that game.

hey buddy its called an analogy. i dont think he would mean that its the exact same just a similar TYPE of injury