ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   NFL Draft Aaron Curry...your opinion. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=199029)

Skip Towne 12-23-2008 05:20 PM

Ass

RustShack 12-23-2008 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5324069)
Hey that guy rules, that's all I gotta say.

Hes just a regular everyday normal guy.

aturnis 12-23-2008 05:21 PM

Why no premier FA's?

Mecca 12-23-2008 05:22 PM

I personally don't think it's a good idea to take a LB that high for a team in this position. If you notice alot of the good teams in the league have mid round picks at that position while their high picks were used on the line and secondary.

aturnis 12-23-2008 05:26 PM

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/TLnWlLTqu4Y&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/TLnWlLTqu4Y&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

eazyb81 12-23-2008 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5324084)
I personally don't think it's a good idea to take a LB that high for a team in this position. If you notice alot of the good teams in the league have mid round picks at that position while their high picks were used on the line and secondary.

But you would be fine with taking a safety, which would be highest a safety has been drafted in modern history.

ROFL

Mecca 12-23-2008 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eazyb81 (Post 5324133)
But you would be fine with taking a safety, which would be highest a safety has been drafted in modern history.

ROFL

Laron Landry was such a shitty pick.

Alot more good teams in the league have 1st round safeties than they do 1st round LB's.

The Eagles have NEVER used a 1st round pick on a LB since Reid took the job, how about the Giants they don't have any.

eazyb81 12-23-2008 05:40 PM

If you watch him play, it's easy to see that Curry is a beast. He is a prototype SAM backer that will blanket TEs in coverage, make tackles in the open field, and create havoc in the backfield on blitzes.

I don't think LB is one of our biggest needs, so if you're a guy that likes to draft based on needs then he probably doesn't appeal to you. But there's a reason every respected draft expert says Curry is the best LB prospect in years and has him at the top of their board right now.

eazyb81 12-23-2008 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5324139)
Laron Landry was such a shitty pick.

Alot more good teams in the league have 1st round safeties than they do 1st round LB's.

The Eagles have NEVER used a 1st round pick on a LB since Reid took the job, how about the Giants they don't have any.

You just tried to say that good teams don't draft LBs early

Quote:

If you notice alot of the good teams in the league have mid round picks at that position while their high picks were used on the line and secondary.
but you bring up Landry as a reason to draft a safety? Were the Redskins good this year?

The way you twist arguments is comical.

The Franchise 12-23-2008 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eazyb81 (Post 5324140)
If you watch him play, it's easy to see that Curry is a beast. He is a prototype SAM backer that will blanket TEs in coverage, make tackles in the open field, and create havoc in the backfield on blitzes.

I don't think LB is one of our biggest needs, so if you're a guy that likes to draft based on needs then he probably doesn't appeal to you. But there's a reason every respected draft expert says Curry is the best LB prospect in years and has him at the top of their board right now.

I stopped reading after the bolded part.

Mecca 12-23-2008 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eazyb81 (Post 5324147)
You just tried to say that good teams don't draft LBs early



but you bring up Landry as a reason to draft a safety? Were the Redskins good this year?

The way you twist arguments is comical.

LB is a devalued position in the league unless you play 3-4, I figured you knew this.

And just throwing out one of the last safeties that went that high, how about Donte Whitner does he suck?

eazyb81 12-23-2008 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pestilenceaf23 (Post 5324148)
I stopped reading after the bolded part.

I should have said OLB, but LB in general shouldn't be a huge need for us when we're healthy with DJ, Demorrio, and Donnie Edwards.

Where would you rank it?

Mecca 12-23-2008 05:44 PM

About as bad as the Dline...

eazyb81 12-23-2008 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5324153)
LB is a devalued position in the league unless you play 3-4, I figured you knew this.

And just throwing out one of the last safeties that went that high, how about Donte Whitner does he suck?

Does Urlacher suck? Does Patrick Willis suck? We can play this game all day.

You brought up the fact that good teams don't draft LBs early, then said Landry was a good pick even though the Redskins suck. Now you're bringing up Whitner when the Bills suck to. Your arguments don't make sense.

Mecca 12-23-2008 05:48 PM

Look my argument isn't that Curry sucks, that's the issue here. My argument is you can get a productive player at that position later in the draft.

High LB's are generally good because LB is like RB it's an easy position for a young guy to step into. But many many lower round LB's are good too, the Colts have made a living doing it.

I don't think it's worth a top 5 pick.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.