ChiefsPlanet
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Does anyone think that Pollard can be LB? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=203977)

Spicy McHaggis 03-10-2009 07:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoHuge39 (Post 5571454)
He'd be better there than at safety. Put some weight on him and he's got the skills. Hell he's even lost his big hit rep at safety because he's always out of position. I haven't seen him lay somebody out in a while besides rolling up on Brady.
I think Pollard's frame is pretty maxed out as far as putting more weight on.

KCinNY 03-10-2009 08:06 PM
Pollard is a special teams guy.....that's it.

Great pick by Herm and Carl.

Hammock Parties 03-10-2009 08:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoHuge39 (Post 5571454)
He'd be better there than at safety. Put some weight on him and he's got the skills.
Pollard DOES NOT have the skills.

He's a god-awful tackler, and gets abused in the open field.

This has been your anti-Pollard public service announcement.

Sweet Daddy Hate 03-10-2009 08:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5571570)
Pollard DOES NOT have the skills.

He's a god-awful tackler, and gets abused in the open field.

This has been your anti-Pollard public service announcement.
Piss on you!

SAUTO 03-10-2009 08:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth CarlSatan (Post 5571473)
He and Flowers absolutely went to work on Oakland.

It was a thing of beauty...rochambeau
DJ TOO

Pioli Zombie 03-10-2009 08:28 PM
Glenn Dorsey should play safety
Posted via Mobile Device

Titty Meat 03-10-2009 09:12 PM
Yes. Pollard could play linebacker in the new football league.

Blick 03-10-2009 09:25 PM
Larry Atkins says probably not.

chiefzilla1501 03-10-2009 09:56 PM
Can he be a weakside backer? Absolutely not.

But I'm surprised how much shit he gets. He had no business being in a Tampa 2. that's a defense that requires safeties to cover a ton of ground and Pollard doesn't have a lot of speed. And that's even worse when your pass rush is so bad that you ask them to cover for forever.

I don't think our safeties are nearly as bad as we believe they are. I think they will look a hell of a lot better with even an average pass rush. And I think both Page and Pollard will benefit from a scheme that isn't so demanding of its safeties.

Hammock Parties 03-10-2009 09:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 5571886)
I think both Page and Pollard will benefit from a scheme that isn't so demanding of its safeties.
Yes, both of them will magically learn the art of tackling.

Sweet Daddy Hate 03-10-2009 10:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 5571886)
Can he be a weakside backer? Absolutely not.

But I'm surprised how much shit he gets. He had no business being in a Tampa 2. that's a defense that requires safeties to cover a ton of ground and Pollard doesn't have a lot of speed. And that's even worse when your pass rush is so bad that you ask them to cover for forever.

I don't think our safeties are nearly as bad as we believe they are. I think they will look a hell of a lot better with even an average pass rush. And I think both Page and Pollard will benefit from a scheme that isn't so demanding of its safeties.
Yes! This!

Sweet Daddy Hate 03-10-2009 10:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5571901)
Yes, both of them will magically learn the art of tackling.
Piss on you!

Munson 03-10-2009 10:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5571570)
Pollard DOES NOT have the skills.

He's a god-awful tackler, and gets abused in the open field.

This has been your anti-Pollard public service announcement.

I couldn't have said it better.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:59 AM.
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.