well the only reason wade has won as much as he has is due to shaq being there. how many times have they even tasted the finals without shaq? lebron took a lesser talented team to the finals on his own

And got swept. Again, what's your point? Shaq was a shell of himself with the Heat. Without Wade they don't win the Championship in 2006. So, let me ask you, what has Shaq done since he left Wade?

without shaq they dont win either. so what if lebron's team lost has wade taken one there by himself?
well for one he was put on a team that runs an offense that he has no business being in. soooo...

No player takes a team to the NBA finals by himself. It's a team sport. You're not making very much sense, but I suppose that's par for the course.

LeBron could have led that Heat team past the first round. The Cavs will sweep the Hawks in the second round.

ok man you know all, lebron had a future HOFer helping him get there. most thought and have said that lebron put that team on his back and carried them there.

Could have? Sure. But so could have Wade, as evidenced by a 7-game series. Hell, if Wade doesn't get hurt the Heat might have won game 4 and the series. Would LeBron have led the Heat team past the Hawks? Probably not.

We agree.

I thought Lebron was the clear choice for MVP this year. A case can be made for Wade but when your team finishes 2 games over .500 it's going to be tough for him to be more than just the runner up.

I know LeBron could have lead the Heat past Atlanta. It's not like the Cavs have a stacked roster or anything, the Heat have about the same amount of talent as the Cavs... Until Cleveland got Mo Williams all the Cavs did was let LeBron penetrate and kick to shooters all day.

Bullshit. The Cavs are better at every position than the Heat except SG and they have a stronger bench.

I don't think that Jermaine O'Neal, Beasley, Haslem, Jumaine Jones, or Chalmers are scrubs. All the Cavs have is good shooters and good post defenders/rebounders.