and the Chiefs are the 88 Chiefs

ROFL

The thing with the Saints is they can get behind and still come back and win.

They are looking good. They don't have Marshall Faulk though.

What is this "come back" you speak of, off-worlder?

They have the 3 headed monster back there.

They don't have Bruce, Holt, or Pace either.

But this team just seems to be one where the whole is better than the sum of the parts.

They also have three legitimate deep threats in Henderson, Moore, and Meachem. Combine that with Shockey and Colston, and Bush's receiving ability, and it's just impossible to shut down all of those guys.

Yeah I know they do, but I'd still rather have Faulk than any of those guys. He was on another planet during that era.

Yeah, they might very well be deeper than the 99 Rams, their top playmakers don't quite match up with the guys the Rams had, but they just have a ton of weapons they can throw at you in different ways. It really looks like them and Vikings are starting to seperate from the pack in the NFC. And that would be an epic battle.

The Saints are a bad matchup for the Vikings...Colston is huge and their best corner is a midget...they defend the run well but their LB's aren't good cover guys.

They would need to be absolutely dominant pass rushing or they'd get eaten alive.

Obviously Shockey is a better TE than anything the Rams ever trotted out, and their 3-5 WRs are better than the '99 Rams, but their OL isn't as good.

There's no way I"m taking a combination of Brett Favre and Brad Childress in any big game.

Perhaps?

No one wants to bite on this?

So who are going to be the Titans
and be thier bitches in the SB?