Quote:
We just took a five-tech and now you want to sink 60 mil into ANOTHER ONE? Suh's talents would be wasted in the 3-4, this point is irrelevant anyway, he's going to Detroit or Tampa Bay and he'll get 6-7 sacks every year and be a Pro Bowl 3-tech. |
Quote:
You simply cannot make that strong of an overt statement about ****ing up one of the highest draft picks in franchise history. |
Quote:
But trading Dorsey and keeping Jackson is lunacy, IMO. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
NT needed ..
|
Quote:
The only way I see the Chiefs selecting Suh is if there is anything to the rumor that Dorsey is being moved inside, which would also indicate that dallas is the model, rather than NE, for this defense that Crennel plans to use. |
That would be a shocker for sure.
And I guess regardless of passing on other players, you'd have to be excited about that front 3. |
Quote:
maybe they are going to a more penetrating 3-4 dline like Dallas. :shrug: anyway ... i doubt suh falls so it really doesn't matter. |
Quote:
How would Suh and Dorsey do in a two down linemen formation? PhilFree:arrow: |
Quote:
If that rumor has any legs, then Suh isn't even germaine to the discussion. |
Quote:
Didn't really work that well, neither Dorsey or Tyson Jackson were great as inside rushers. In fact as has been pointed out in the past, the cheap guys - Magee and Gilberry - were more productive. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I would love to have Suh if we cant get Berry. He is the best player in this draft right along with Eric. And I don't give a **** what any of you say, Suh could and would play Nose Tackle for us.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.