ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Ok, Grade the first 3 rounds of the draft (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=227133)

petegz28 04-23-2010 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 6706275)
And the downside of this is?

Too clarify, I don't think the McCluster pick was bad. I do think the Arenas pick was bad. That is what drug down the grade. I should have said that better.

cdcox 04-23-2010 07:03 PM

This isn't a team that can be taking role players in the 2nd round.

the Talking Can 04-23-2010 07:03 PM

there is no grade appropriate to the 2nd round relative to the picks we had and the value available....so bad no words can describe it


Berry is an A
Assmooga is a A simply because he could be an immediate starter and is not the pathetic disaster of the 2nd round picks...but we still took a guard while having no nt and no lbs or pass rushers on an absolute joke of a defense

SenselessChiefsFan 04-23-2010 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 6706249)
Without making a trade, they could have had Berry, Clausen, and Cody in the first 2 rounds alone. D

So, basically, you wanted a stud and two busts?

Mecca 04-23-2010 07:04 PM

Because Philly wanted a guy is not an acceptable reason to take someone.

Hammock Parties 04-23-2010 07:04 PM

I gave them a D+ because a blind, reeruned squirrel that just fell out of Hamas' AIDS tree could have picked Eric Berry.

Sanka 04-23-2010 07:04 PM

ROUND) SCORE - GRADE

1) 95 - A

2) negative 15 - F minus

3) 87 - B plus

wazu 04-23-2010 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6706312)
I gave them a D+ because a blind, reeruned squirrel that just fell out of Hamas' AIDS tree could have picked Eric Berry.

That same squirrel could have picked any two of about ten players in the second round and scored an A for the round.

SenselessChiefsFan 04-23-2010 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6706308)
Because Philly wanted a guy is not an acceptable reason to take someone.

No, the acceptable reason is that he projects out to be the next Wes Welker. He isn't a reach because Philly was going to take him.

Of course, then again, maybe they just lucked into a QB at some point and they are a bunch of idiots too.

booger 04-23-2010 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 6706296)
Too clarify, I don't think the McCluster pick was bad. I do think the Arenas pick was bad. That is what drug down the grade. I should have said that better.

pretty much spot on with my thoughts. One or the other IMO but not both of the 2nds with the needs. Mccluster could be a slot and return guy but the downside is his 172 lb frame. Arenas has the return skills as well but won't ever be more than a nickel CB.

I really like the Asumoah pick.

Gonna have to hope Cam Thomas slides to rd 4 to find our NT. ILB Donald Butler would be nice to have too.

Mr. Flopnuts 04-23-2010 07:08 PM

2 out of 4 picks are starters. In this draft, that's an F. Drafting Berry instead of Okung made me move it up to a D.

the Talking Can 04-23-2010 07:10 PM

why the **** are people running around claiming mccluster is the next wes welker?

cdcox 04-23-2010 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 6706358)
why the **** are people running around claiming mccluster is the next wes welker?

Because Pioli drafted him, silly!

petegz28 04-23-2010 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 6706358)
why the **** are people running around claiming mccluster is the next wes welker?

You're right. He is faster and has better moves than Welker.

RedThat 04-23-2010 07:12 PM

Berry-A+

McCluster-B+

Arenas-D

Asamouh-A


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:29 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.