I think it would depend on the content.

If you to watching a baseball game, probably not. But with something like Avatar (and what they have planned for the future of cinema), probably so.

But it sounds like you're set, either way. :thumb:

avsforum?

There are a lot of things I HATE watching in 120 and prefer 60. It can tend to make things look weird and move oddly. Don't really know how to describe, just take the "silver screen" effect of hollywood away and makes it look like a soap opera...

I'm going to get a new TV soon.

I have a 60 HZ 42" Phillips LCD HDTV that I bought for $1200 a few years ago. It would probably cost me $500 now.

I'm not sure if I should go bigger (YES), but I cant go too expensive. 120 HZ at least, and maybe 46"?

I wonder whats the least expensive good TV following my criteria. Also, I don't care if its LCD or Plasma.

Just get an LED and be done with it. If you do not want to spend that much, get a plasma and you won't have to worry if its 120 or 240hz...

Why do that? I was told everything you need you can get right here at CP.

From what I understand only Samsung and Sony have a true 240hz tv. That was the case in 2009. 2010 models may be different. I think the biggest difference is between 60 to 120 also, but there is a difference between 120 and 240. Most people won't see it.