ChiefsPlanet
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs 9 carries (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=240003)

tk13 01-09-2011 04:52 PM
I think some of it was situational. We just didn't have that many offensive plays in the 1st half... couldn't get their offense off the field. 2nd possession of the 2nd half started with that grounding penalty that killed us, then the next drive had the INT right off the bat... and that sent the game out of control.

Superbowltrashcan 01-09-2011 04:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by haydenchiefs101 (Post 7339943)
getnickwright nick wright
So Jamaal Charles was too injured to run, but not too injured to be asked to pick up blitz pickups? OK. Makes perfect sense.
That block on Suggs ( i think) was massive....yeah why that but no carries....

jjjayb 01-09-2011 05:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tk13 (Post 7340125)
I think some of it was situational. We just didn't have that many offensive plays in the 1st half... couldn't get their offense off the field. 2nd possession of the 2nd half started with that grounding penalty that killed us, then the next drive had the INT right off the bat... and that sent the game out of control.
Go back and look at the play by play on nfl.com. Look what consistently happened when we ran with Charles on 1st down. Look what consistently happened when we passed on 1st down.

And again. With the run game working, why no play action passing!?!

Dartgod 01-09-2011 05:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjjayb (Post 7340169)
Go back and look at the play by play on nfl.com. Look what consistently happened when we ran with Charles on 1st down. Look what consistently happened when we passed on 1st down.

And again. With the run game working, why no play action passing!?!
Because we are and idiot.

HonestChieffan 01-09-2011 05:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by threebag02 (Post 7339894)
Did Charles get Hurt?
yes

MichaelH 01-09-2011 05:04 PM
I think Charles didn't get many carries because Weis is now in Florida eating pork rinds and could give a shit about KC.

Reerun_KC 01-09-2011 05:05 PM
Wish he would learn to hold on to the ball...

RJ 01-09-2011 05:06 PM
Charles had how many touches out of how many total plays?

I think the problem was not having the ball.

KCBOSS1 01-09-2011 05:06 PM
Sad thing is that he had 9 carries and had the ball more than anybody else. They didn't have the ball!....hardly at all.

jspchief 01-09-2011 05:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjjayb (Post 7340169)
Go back and look at the play by play on nfl.com. Look what consistently happened when we ran with Charles on 1st down. Look what consistently happened when we passed on 1st down.

And again. With the run game working, why no play action passing!?!
Yes, the play-calling was horrible. It reminded me of the Vermeil days when we'd get away from what we did best in an effort to "outsmart" the opponent. Let the team play to their strengths, and if that doesn't work, then get cute.

Extra Point 01-09-2011 05:16 PM
We got there, we just didn't effectively call and execute plays, relative to skill level and formations.

That first challenge was a loser. We did not hasten our offense. Fat Albert jumped, as we were so out of rhythm getting in the plays. No quick slant, no chance.

No middle help on defense, no chance.

A better team beat us, today. We need a smash mouth coordinator, and we need some line help to do the smashing.

JD10367 01-09-2011 05:38 PM
Wanker
Eating
Incestuous
Scumbag

FAX 01-09-2011 06:16 PM
I think you need to be on offense in order to run the ball.

FAX

TheGuardian 01-09-2011 06:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FAX (Post 7340589)
I think you need to be on offense in order to run the ball.

FAX
This.

Agree that Charles did not get enough carries, but the defensive plan today blew chunks. You CANNOT let a team hold the ball that long. And Romeo never made any adjustments to the gaping holes in the middle of the field the entire day. That's why they converted 3rd and long over and over again.

grey redstar 01-09-2011 07:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjjayb (Post 7339729)
9 carries is what Charles had today. So much for the "we were resting him for the playoffs" theory. Why in the hell did we completely abandon the run game in the 2nd half? We had 100 yards rushing in the fist half then decided to come out and go pass happy in the 2nd half?

Our first play in the second half was an empty backfield? Seriously?!? If we wanted to put the ball in Cassel's hands, why didn't we use play action passing? I'm definitely glad Weiss is leaving. With that gameplan, if he wasn't leaving, he should've been fired.
I didn't get it either. If you're picking averaging 9 yards a carry why wouldn't you keep pounding it? I think we would have adjusted if they kept up the run, but I think it would have kept us honest. Its like they lost confidence in cahrles after the fumble. A lot about the Chiefs coaching, and gameplan confused me. Hey I'm glad to come out with the win, but was looking for something completely different out of Weis and Crennel.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:34 PM.
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.