ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Saccopoo Memorial Draft Forum (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   My official endorsement for the 21st overall pick. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=242233)

milkman 03-02-2011 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Urc Burry (Post 7463236)
So you would agree that Ayers would be the better pick?

I like Houston but I can't see his big ass in coverage.

And Studebaker is the Thiggy of LB's...The fans root for him, but in reality he is not that good

I didn't get to watch a lot of college ball this season, and I didn't see his combine workout either.

But what little I did see, I did like his ability to cover, and the speed he seemed to posess to get around the edge when he does rush the passer.

Titty Meat 03-02-2011 08:45 PM

If we're talking about a coverage linebacker Ayers might be the best guy then. Andy Studebaker ****ing sucks.

Direckshun 03-02-2011 08:57 PM

See maybe that's where I get all crazy.

Because I consider the ILBs to be the coverage backers.

This is so stupid. Like it's a bad thing for a team to have two Tamba Halis.

Titty Meat 03-02-2011 08:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 7463333)
See maybe that's where I get all crazy.

Because I consider the ILBs to be the coverage backers.

This is so stupid. Like it's a bad thing for a team to have two Tamba Halis.

I think the playoff game vs the Ravens showed just how bad our linebackers were in coverage.

milkman 03-02-2011 09:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 7463333)
See maybe that's where I get all crazy.

Because I consider the ILBs to be the coverage backers.

This is so stupid. Like it's a bad thing for a team to have two Tamba Halis.

No one is saying it's a bad thing to have two Halis.

I even said that is what I would want.

But that's not Crennel's system.

Direckshun 03-02-2011 09:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 7463344)
I think the playoff game vs the Ravens showed just how bad our linebackers were in coverage.

Yeah, the defense didn't lose us that game.

milkman 03-02-2011 09:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 7463381)
Yeah, the defense didn't lose us that game.

Todd Heap abused the LBs over the middle in that game.

'Hamas' Jenkins 03-02-2011 09:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 7463381)
Yeah, the defense didn't lose us that game.

It doesn't mean they weren't horrible in coverage.

Urc Burry 03-02-2011 09:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 7463381)
Yeah, the defense didn't lose us that game.

No but we made Todd Heap look all pro

Direckshun 03-02-2011 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 7463403)
Todd Heap abused the LBs over the middle in that game.

Over the middle, you say?

Shit. I mean I don't know much about football, but I could have sworn we had players in the middle of the field in that linebacker range?

:D

Really, I'm not a coordinator or anything, but it would seem to me that the only time you should have an OLB play a ton of snaps in coverage is if your opponent is running 4 or 5 wide on a regular basis.

milkman 03-02-2011 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 7463428)
Over the middle, you say?

Shit. I mean I don't know much about football, but I could have sworn we had players in the middle of the field in that linebacker range?

:D

Really, I'm not a coordinator or anything, but it would seem to me that the only time you should have an OLB play a ton of snaps in coverage is if your opponent is running 4 or 5 wide on a regular basis.

You're not getting it.

I am not talking about what I would do on defense.

I am talking about the system that Crennel runs.

He uses all his LBs in coverage.

Saccopoo 03-02-2011 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 7463297)
If we're talking about a coverage linebacker Ayers might be the best guy then. Andy Studebaker ****ing sucks.

Herzlich has substantially better coverage skills than Ayers and has shown a much greater passion for the game itself. I watched a number of Boston College games this past season and Herzlich got better every single game. In their final bowl game against Nevada, the guy was all over the field and in on nearly every play. He ended the season with four interceptions.

He ran a bad 40 at the combine, but if you watched him in the rest of the drills, he was by far and away the most polished guy out there with the best footwork and instincts.

And Milk is correct and he's saying exactly what I was inferring from the start of this thread. The LOLB in a 3-4, and specifically Crennel's 3-4 defense, is dropping a lot in zone coverage and is asked to man cover the tight end a lot. You don't want two pure pass rushers in this defense.

Like I stated, Houston isn't a good choice for this defense because we've already got the same guy in Hali, who is coming into his prime and has been a force rushing the passer. He's a proven commodity and it would be redundant to bring in another guy just like him. Neither Hali or Houston are ideal LOLBs in this system.

Titty Meat 03-03-2011 01:52 AM

Heap tore the Chiefs up over the middle and the linebackers sucked in space against Rice.

I'm sorry but i'm not spending a first on Herzlich. This will likely come off as assholish but i'm not sure how much stock you can put into a guy who had cancer. I mean i'm sure the treatment had to have done a number on his body I question how long he'll be able to hold up.

Ayers would be an interesting pick but I think in this spot you go with the famous trade down option.

Direckshun 03-03-2011 02:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 7463459)
You're not getting it.

I am not talking about what I would do on defense.

I am talking about the system that Crennel runs.

He uses all his LBs in coverage.

And I'm telling you the same thing I told DoucheMcCloud in the Lounge: you guys are all hung up on the purity of a system, you're forgetting the reality on the ground.

The Crennel system also gets a halfway decent passrush from its DEs. Which, despite the fact that we have spent Top 5s on two DEs, we don't have. Dorsey and Jackson are never going to have 7-8 sack seasons. We'll be lucky if either has a 3-sack season. And that's coming from a guy that believes in both players.

So we have to engineer those sacks from somewhere, or else trade/replace those two DEs.

So while I understand what you're saying, and agree that Ayers is definitely more of a Crennel SOLB prototype, we need the potential for double-digit sacks that Houston provides. Period.

Now, in my opening post, I said that I did not expect Pioli to pick Houston, mostly for the reason you specified.

Coogs 03-03-2011 11:14 AM

The Baltimore coverag problems by our defense were somewhat scheme related as well...

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showt...ht=merril+hoge


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.