![]() |
I agree If he fell to the Chiefs and they took him I'd give it 2 1/2 mehs. I like what he could become but I was never impressed with his "big game" ability
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I thought it was an interesting take. While everyone is busy getting 12% of their mock drafts correct, he goes somewhere new.
And I do agree that Mallett will be the best QB in this draft. (as listed in another article on his site). |
Had time buying this list without listing Cam Newton. He may be a very good QB (I highly dount it) but he is just as likely if not more to bust. An inaccurate, look to run quickly if anything breaks down and first read not open QB sure looks like a bust to me.
Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://www.ajc.com/sports/atlanta-fa...es-855282.html He was terrible at the combine in all throwing drills. Granted, it is the combine and I would not weight anything at the combine too highly, except that he was a shotgun QB in college that rarely dropped back and has been widely criticized for poor footwork. I would have zero interest in him for my team. I would take Gabbert over him all day long and would rather roll the dice on Mallet later in the draft than roll the dice on Newton so early. |
I didn't read the thing, I mean...recliner qb.com? Really?
I did happen to glance at it and see this gem: Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I agree with everything that he said about Locker and have been saying roughly the same thing on here for the last two years. The guy just flat isn't accurate enough.
|
You can't have more character red flags as a prospect than Ryan Mallett. It doesn't surprise me that Mahi "The Masters has too many commercials" Mike would think he'll be the best QB from this class.
He has a better chance of being dead in 10 years than he does of being the best QB from this class. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:48 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.