Let me be sure I understand this.

About half of Chiefsplanet wants to see our rookie QB come in, and they want to see him do well, and they want the rest of the team to be terrible in order to get a draft pick that will be used to replace the rookie quarterback who plays well.

Did I get that right?

A bird in the had is worth two in the stink
~don't know what started this trend, why fight it

Butthurt? ... or is it ballsack?

No exactly....I want him to do well enough for this regime to see we can dump the absolute shit in front of him. Doubt that happens though.

The current regime drafted him, right?

I'm sure he sucks then.
Posted via Mobile Device

If Stanzi gets us to 8-8 or even 7-9....shit, he might be the guy.

Clarification: IF HE WINS TWO OR THREE OF THE LAST THREE GAMES.

You ever notice how teams that develop young QBs always seem to have one?

Apparently this is the case. Starting Stanzi at this point is a no-brainier. If you are pioli and have to decide if it's worth trading away our entire draft for a qb, wouldn't you want to know just how well the rookie qb you already have can play? If we lose, so what? We're going to lose with palko anyway. If Stanzi can't handle the pressure its unlikely that he'll turn into Joe Montana just by holding a clipboard for two years.

There's nothing wrong with developing a tradable asset/backup to go with a drafted QBOTF.

I think we're already in a place where our chances of getting one of the top 3 guys are low.

I'm also firmly convinced they won't draft a QB in the 1st round anyway.

So my hope is that Stanzi lights it up because I don't want any part of seeing Cassel here next year.

5% chance Stanzi is the QBOTF. 2.5% chance KC grabs RGIII in the draft. My vote is that Stanzi gets the nod and lights it up the last 3 weeks.

Honestly, if Orton is healthy I can't see any reason why Romeo wouldn't play him since Orton played GB this year and helped put up 20+ points, something KC's offense hasn't done in months.