yeah.. it's just PAST the line for me... a little less and I'd jump at it. 2 1sts and a 2nd and 4th or even 3rd would probably be ok with me. I tried to make the choice as tough as possible.

With all due respect sir,those draft pics won't matter if we don't have a QB.

It's really only one 1st rounder... the 2013 pick that we would be giving up. The other one in 2012 is just a swap of spots.

yeah, we should stick with orton and save those picks for drafting players whose careers will be wasted because we don't have a franchise QB...

Kalil for the kill. Then pick best Qb we can get.

Well, I don't really like any of the options. My first preference would be to package fewer picks with one of our defensive play-makers to move up and grab Griffin or perhaps Bradford. Of the choices given, I would probably trade way down for future picks to use as ammo in the 2013 draft.

Baldwin, Berry, Hudson and Dex for a franchise QB? Any day of the week.

every day of the year

Any QB that jumps from meh to top 3 in a few months
ain't worth two year's 1s & 2s

While I'd like to see RGIII too, he'll be unavailable. I'd like Richardson or OL.

Stop saying this, it's really stupid.

Don't you think the team is pretty young already? why not keep young players and trade the picks?
That is provide the QB is really worth the trade. And I don't really know for sure that any of them are.

I'm leery of RG3 as an NFL QB. For Luck or Barkley, I'd do it.

Have any of the QB's we've had won us a superbowl? The bar cant get any lower, when talking about Chiefs and our QB's you have no where to go but up!

I know that none of our QB's on the roster (save for maybe stanzi) are for our future. Isnt it time to change that? Go ditka and get us RG or Luck..whatever it takes

#1