ChiefsPlanet
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Fantasy/CasinoPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=22)
-   -   SPChief and WV (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=257539)

Dartgod 03-20-2012 10:25 AM
ROFL

KurtCobain 03-20-2012 10:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sofa King (Post 8475329)
Agreed. Why do we even vote?

Hell, why do we even do the contests?

This is ridiculous. All this could be avoided with a simple voting deadline.

What does this even ****ing mean?


Ummm, the contests are for immunity. That worked.

The votes decided on SPChief and WV. However, two times they tied. They tied. They tied. Do I need to post that again? So my vote kicks one of them off.

You guys are bitching for no ****ing reason. Things are running just how they're supposed to. Take a ****ing chill pill because this is really pissing me off.

ToxSocks 03-20-2012 10:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KurtCobain (Post 8475347)
They are ironed people just don't pay attention.

I said on the elimination thread, that is was a tie again. In fact, detoxing, it was you're vote that tied it up.

So after two ties, the way we handled out in the last game is I decided who goes, and o based out pod who I thought would make the more interesting. I couldn't decide, so I decided this is how id pick my you're breaking vote.

Don't like it? bye.
How many people voted for someone who was unknowingly immune? And would that have changed the outcome of the vote?

Sofa King 03-20-2012 10:27 AM
Hey, we're not done changing our votes yet.

Give us more time!

KurtCobain 03-20-2012 10:27 AM
I don't see how this could be clearer.

Last time we had a tie, I picked who left and stayed. NOONE SAID A WORD.

KurtCobain 03-20-2012 10:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 8475364)
How many people voted for someone who was unknowingly immune? And would that have changed the outcome of the vote?
Four people voted for loochy. I posted that in the elimination thread.

Of those four people, when we revoted, three of them voted WV. However, somebody changed their vote in the revote, and we now came to a tie again.

This is the final tie breaker.

Get it guys?

KurtCobain 03-20-2012 10:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sofa King (Post 8475369)
Hey, we're not done changing our votes yet.

Give us more time!
Look, this was all to be done last night. It was. We were running on perfect time. Anyone who expected the new game to be posted last night was high. I've said multiple times tuesday would be the day. If you guys cant read individual posts and need to be babied, then **** you.

Sofa King 03-20-2012 10:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KurtCobain (Post 8475389)
Look, this was all to be done last night. It was. We were running on perfect time. Anyone who expected the new game to be posted last night was high. I've said multiple times tuesday would be the day. If you guys cant read individual posts and need to be babied, then **** you.
Wait a second. I think this is just a simple error. What time is it out there where you live, i think we need to sync our watches or something.

Actually, what kind of watch are you using? Does it have a timer? I'm using my cell phone and a Ninja Turtles watch i won in the quarter vending machine in front of KMART when i was 6. If you're wondering, i have the watch synced up to my phone, so no worries there.

Let me know immediately, this is important.

luv 03-20-2012 10:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KurtCobain (Post 8475351)
No they ****ing weren't. IT WAS A TIE AGAIN.
And people are still changing their votes. I actually like Pest's suggestion.

You seem to be getting frustrated. You just need to have a plan in place for events of a tie, and let the people know what it's going to be before randomly deciding what to do about it.

People like structure. People like to know that they're all playing by the same rules and being treated fairly. Pest's suggestion makes sense. If it's a tie, then go by they're last performance. The weak link goes. If the team is divided, then let the individual's performance decide (which, I guess, would ultimately be the judges deciding).

Again, in case loochy complains that I'm trying to influence the votes and the game, I just want to say that this is only my suggestion.

Sofa King 03-20-2012 10:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by luv (Post 8475419)
And people are still changing their votes. I actually like Pest's suggestion.

You seem to be getting frustrated. You just need to have a plan in place for events of a tie, and let the people know what it's going to be before randomly deciding what to do about it.

People like structure. People like to know that they're all playing by the same rules and being treated fairly. Pest's suggestion makes sense. If it's a tie, then go by they're last performance. The weak link goes. If the team is divided, then let the individual's performance decide (which, I guess, would ultimately be the judges deciding).

Again, in case loochy complains that I'm trying to influence the votes and the game, I just want to say that this is only my suggestion.
http://chrisblattman.com/files/2011/...ig1.jpg?9d7bd4

ToxSocks 03-20-2012 10:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by luv (Post 8475419)
And people are still changing their votes. I actually like Pest's suggestion.

You seem to be getting frustrated. You just need to have a plan in place for events of a tie, and let the people know what it's going to be before randomly deciding what to do about it.

People like structure. People like to know that they're all playing by the same rules and being treated fairly. Pest's suggestion makes sense. If it's a tie, then go by they're last performance. The weak link goes. If the team is divided, then let the individual's performance decide (which, I guess, would ultimately be the judges deciding).

Again, in case loochy complains that I'm trying to influence the votes and the game, I just want to say that this is only my suggestion.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sofa King (Post 8475423)
X3

Rasputin 03-20-2012 10:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pestilence*** (Post 8475321)
JMO.....but it should go by vote and if there is a tie....it should go by score on the last contest.

I agree with this.

loochy 03-20-2012 10:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by luv (Post 8475419)
And people are still changing their votes. I actually like Pest's suggestion.

You seem to be getting frustrated. You just need to have a plan in place for events of a tie, and let the people know what it's going to be before randomly deciding what to do about it.

People like structure. People like to know that they're all playing by the same rules and being treated fairly. Pest's suggestion makes sense. If it's a tie, then go by they're last performance. The weak link goes. If the team is divided, then let the individual's performance decide (which, I guess, would ultimately be the judges deciding).

Again, in case loochy complains that I'm trying to influence the votes and the game, I just want to say that this is only my suggestion.
Suggesting that kind of stuff is great. I just didn't like when you were saying stuff like "oh you are voting off the wrong person, blah blah, etc."

WV 03-20-2012 10:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KurtCobain (Post 8475379)
Four people voted for loochy. I posted that in the elimination thread.

Of those four people, when we revoted, three of them voted WV. However, somebody changed their vote in the revote, and we now came to a tie again.

This is the final tie breaker.

Get it guys?
Not sure of the rules here, but isn't everyone supposed to re-vote again not just those that voted for Loochy?

loochy 03-20-2012 10:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by WV (Post 8475476)
Not sure of the rules here, but isn't everyone supposed to re-vote again not just those that voted for Loochy?
yeah, but some of the people aren't responding


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:34 PM.
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.