and Cassel would still suck

Its looks pretty, but Shitbag is still the QB.

You dont need an All-world OL to win in the NFL.

:LOL: :LOL: :LOL: :LOL: :LOL:

My five friends are enjoying your last comment. :spock:

If you to be all-world in a few places to consistently win in the NFL. A GREAT offensive line allows many wonderous things to happen:

1. Protect your backfield
2. Great running game
3. Time for multiple move routes in the passing game
4. Control the tempo of the game/Defense gets rest
5. Impose your will on defenses

If you don't have a great OL, you better be damn great several other places on the field.

As would I. I have no issue with Albert at LT.
If we're that hard up for an Offensive Lineman who can help shore up the left side...stand pat and draft DeCastro.

does yellow make you sad too?

Have your five friends watched the super bowl in recent years? It isn't 1996 anymore.

Brock...wave your wand and bring us a franchise QB instead.

Name one Super Bowl winner (Brady does not count) who had a QB that was so unaccomplished in college (ala: Tannehill).

You've missed the point. You're arguing that a great OL is absolutely necessary to win in the NFL.

You're wrong. It isn't a necessity, and the teams winning the super bowl lately should give you all the illustration you need. It's only a necessity if you've given up on fixing what's really wrong with the team.

I'm not arguing against drafting Kalil at 11.

Who doesn't want to fix the Chiefs' QB situation?

:facepalm:

Pioli and Clark.

Right:spock:

Most of CP.

Any idiot that doesn't want to move up for DeCastro.

You are high as shit if you think that Albert beats out Kalil at LT.

Kalil
Hudson
Molk
Asamoah
Winston

Albert gets traded on draft day if we get Kalil, or he goes inside. Period.