![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Very few wanted this kid before the draft, now people think he's a great pick. People are already setting it up for when he sucks his first year (or two or three) they can break out the "of course he was going to suck his first year" argument. He'll get a ridiculously long leash for no other reason than who drafted him. |
Quote:
I don't think interstellar travel is worth our time to research, but if Stephen Hawking says it is, I'll defer to him because he's a proven genius. I'll admit I didn't like the Poe selection, but if Romeo Crennel says he has the ability to be molded into someone excellent, I'll defer to him because he's a legit defensive line genius. Same thing with Herm Edwards and defensive backs -- the guy had a really great eye for them, despite his deficiencies everywhere else (and I do mean everywhere else). Think Todd Haley and receivers, and so on... |
And I will say this, OTW.
We've had this debate a couple years ago when you were the Chiefs GM in the CP Mock draft. You have to reach for franchise nose tackles, just like you have to reach for franchise quarterbacks. Other wise you end up with midround guys at "great value" instead of high round talent at iffy value (to be generous...). Poe was a legit 2nd round prospect that we ended up taking way too high in the same vein that Miami did the same thing with Tannehill. But the position is so important with so few prospects who truly look like they are able to fulfill the role, that you almost have to take the "if you don't have a franchise nose, you take one" motto that we've used for quarterbacks for years. |
Quote:
Also, I wouldn't be shocked if Powe, not Poe, was starting week 1. You look back at clips of Powe and he looks impressive. I don't know what happened with him last year cracking the roster. |
Quote:
Were there others? Edit: It will be an extremely fun competition between Poe and Powe for that starting nose tackle position -- I'm going to love it. I think they just purposefully brought Powe along very slowly last year. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
I've told you I didn't like the pick. It was a solid one-round reach. But it's not logically inconsistent to come around on the player if Crennel vouches for the guy. This is the bread-and-butter of a Super Bowl caliber defensive coordinator. That doesn't mean I have to come around on value, because it was piss poor value. |
I don't like the Poe pick at #11 either.
As Milkman notes, the value of a safety is rising and, IMO conversely, the value of a nose is falling in today's NFL. So I think the positional value argument can be challenged. Nevertheless, a host of CPers over the past several seasons have said that a NT was the #1 need of this team. Directshun, I think your analysis is a good one. I think Pioli regrets having passed on Cody. He was probably thinking the same of Cody what people are saying now about Poe. Yet, Cody worked out well. He also learned the lesson that the NT position is plug and play only if you want average play that does not push the pocket. You can fill with journeymen and late round picks for someone to be a fireplug up the middle. The thing that has me coming to grips with the Poe selection so early was that Romeo explained, in essence, that he was the only NT that had a hope of collapsing the pocket because of his size and strength. If a NT can collapse a pocket while being double teamed, Romeo's point was that it would prevent an opposing QB from stepping up in the pocket. That helps defend against the pass, as well as the run, making his positional value higher. If he is basically saying that only a monster like Ngata can collapse the pocket and that Poe is the only one in the class with that sort of physical ability, I can see it and have some hope that Poe (with proper coaching) can become an elite NT, rather than just a serviceable one. I think it was a big roll of the dice and the odds don't favor that he can become an elite; but, I can come to grips with the desperation/excitement that Romeo felt. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:48 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.