ChiefsPlanet
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Why did the Chiefs release Gaither? (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=264792)

TheGuardian 10-07-2012 09:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by -King- (Post 8990551)
No one is giving up a pick for him.
Posted via Mobile Device
Exactly. Some of you....jesus.

BigMeatballDave 10-07-2012 09:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 8990543)
I don't see how that matters. The guy is insanely talented. Worst case scenario, the Chiefs trade him for a good pick.
Like others have said, he cannot stay healthy.

One of the few good decisions they've made.

-King- 10-07-2012 09:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 8990556)
he averages 5.6 a season. good try though. e for effort/gold star/get em next time
He averaged 2.6 when he left kc. There was absolutely no reason to believe he'd ever have another 5 sack season, much less a double digit sack season.
Posted via Mobile Device

BigMeatballDave 10-07-2012 09:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 8990525)
why did Pioli release Jason Babin?


we could play this game all night with our crap GM over the last 4 years
Look. More reeruned shit from you.

I hate Pioli as much as the next guy, but if you're gonna bash, at least be honest and check facts.

morphius 10-07-2012 09:50 PM
From everything posted it here he was unwilling to play RT leaving us with the crappiest RT in the league. That and he is oft injured. It did make me feel kind of good him helping SD lose tonight.

DaneMcCloud 10-07-2012 09:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by -King- (Post 8990563)
He averaged 2.6 when he left kc. There was absolutely no reason to believe he'd ever have a 5 sack season, much less a double digit sack season.
Posted via Mobile Device

He had a five sack season in 2006.

BigMeatballDave 10-07-2012 09:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by -King- (Post 8990563)
He averaged 2.6 when he left kc. There was absolutely no reason to believe he'd ever have a 5 sack season, much less a double digit sack season.
Posted via Mobile Device
He had 13 sacks in his 1st 3 seasons playing OLB in a 3-4.

He's much better in a 4-3, which is now proven.

DaneMcCloud 10-07-2012 09:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave (Post 8990575)
He had 13 sacks in his 1st 3 seasons playing OLB in a 3-4.

He's much better in a 4-3, which is now proven.
The Chiefs ran a 4-3 in 2008

-King- 10-07-2012 09:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 8990574)
He had a five sack season in 2006.
Another*

My bad.

-King- 10-07-2012 09:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 8990581)
The Chiefs ran a 4-3 in 2008
And they ran a 3-4 in 2009.

DaneMcCloud 10-07-2012 09:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by -King- (Post 8990592)
And they ran a 3-4 in 2009.
Right, which is why he wasn't retained.

Well, that and the might Mike Vrabel.

BigMeatballDave 10-07-2012 09:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 8990581)
The Chiefs ran a 4-3 in 2008
Yep. And the reason he didn't come back is probably because he knew the Chiefs were switching to 3-4.

Pitt Gorilla 10-07-2012 09:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by morphius (Post 8990570)
From everything posted it here he was unwilling to play RT leaving us with the crappiest RT in the league. That and he is oft injured. It did make me feel kind of good him helping SD lose tonight.
That makes sense.

DaWolf 10-07-2012 09:57 PM
Last year I heard it was because they wanted to protect Mims, who they promoted from the practice squad.

That worked out well...

aturnis 10-07-2012 10:36 PM
B/c he only plays when he wants to. He misses tons of time in training camp and weekly practices with injuries. Still wants to play though. **** him, they can have him.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:45 PM.
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.