Just about everything.

We are so starved for a QB that people actually like the thought of acquiring Kirk ****ing Cousins.

Would he be more entertaining to watch then Quinassel? Probably. But that doesn't mean he'd be the solution.

Oh, and you guys only have 3 more games left of watching the flaming pile of shit Quinassel, I would think. I thought that after Crennel benched Cassel that that was the sign that Cassel is on his way out.

So you're saying Nick Foles wouldn't even be in the discussion as being the starter between him, Cassel, and Quinn? That's just the kind of complete stupidity that keeps people buying tickets at Arrowhead.

Nick Foles vs Tampa 32/51 381 yds 2 tds 0 int

Brady Quinn vs Tampa 22/38 180 yds 0 td's, 2 ints

Precisely.

Do you want to win a Super Bowl?

Better than Cassel or Quinn isn't the ****ing goal.

Better than bad <> good.

I believe my post said "probably would have made us more competitive", not anything about winning a Super Bowl. I thought my post was pretty self-explanatory, but then I'm not from Kansas or Missouri, so let me slow it down for you. My point was that any of these 3 guys would be better than what we have, so let's not let the same guy who passed on these 3 guys pick the next guy. Do you understand now, or should I use crayons?

....and Geno will be an upgrade over any of these slapdicks.

Pioli would never have tried to get us a good QB. He was determined to live or die with Cassel. He should die, but he won't. Clark won't fire him yet, GM's always get at least 10 years it seems, at least with KC it does.

We are stuck with Pioli and he'll probably draft Landry Jones or some shit with the #1 pick.

Wilson is the only one that belongs in any conversation involving QBs.

And Geno has more potential than all 3 Qbs combined.

Stop right there, sir.

And we would have nevar known the joy of Chocolate Penii.

So you don't think Foles or Cousins is as good as Stanzi/Quinn/Cassel? You agree with Pioli in that if you had Cassel, Quinn, and Stanzi on your roster that you're so set at QB that you wouldn't want to take a stab at Foles or Cousins in the 3rd round? Because that's what you're saying.

No. What he's saying is that none of them-aside from Wilson- are part of the solution.

Did my post say that they were part of the solution, or did my post say that they probably would have made us more competitive than the guys we had, so let's not let the same guy who passed over them--given what we had--pick the next guy?

****ing illiterates....

And Dalton instead of Baldwin.