If Reid sounded intrigued, it was probably because he was shocked we never played Stanzi in the regular season.

Looks like Stanzi is the Manzi again...lolz

I'm sure Andy wants to see if he can turn into something that can be a serviceable backup/trade piece ala Kolb in a few years.

I love what Reid said here. "That’s how it works when there’s a change."

Translation: You have no more friends in the front office or the coaching staff, Matt. You're all alone. You have no more excuses. You will be judged the way you should have been judged 4 years ago when you came in, and you will lose.

Ya hopefully he plays the last game of the season after we go 14-1. We can sit Geno and have Stanzi throw 6 or 7 td's then trade him for a first rounder.

oh yes. *cackles*

I can't wait for Stanzi to start. It's in the bag.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/A7SwSd59E4I" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

1:11 is relevant

Check out Reid's interview with Dave Stewart here:

http://youtu.be/Stkgbv9v25Q

Good stuff. Specifically about the QB, he says that his QB must be an extension of him on the field, and that the QB must be able to elevate the game of those around him. He is also specifically asked about whether he believes that he can succeed with a "game manager" at QB and Reid insists that the QB has to be good enough to go win games for you and to raise the level of play around him.

Basically, it's a long way of saying adios Matt Cassel...

Reid, and Dorsey for that matter, have made it clear that they think in today's age a QB needs to be a able to win you games. They can't just manage a game.

Cassel raised Dwayne Bowe's level of play you guys.

AND Jamaal Charles.

Before Matt came to KC they were NOTHING.

Gee, and here all this time, I thought it was Todd Haley's influence.

:rolleyes:

I got absolutely wasted with Ricky Stanzi on more than one occasion. True story.

Did he talk about how kick-ass the USA is?