...

Kind of amazes me that if someone does not care to discuss a thought that another has that they resort to trying to humliate the poster. I had what I thought was a topic that would make for an interesting discussion. Instead of getting on a high horse out of the gate how about sharing your thoughts and reasons why you disagree.

:bong: :popcorn:

I think we should stop referring to him as Stanzi and start referring to him as Stanzi's Hair. It makes everything sound better. For example,

"I think we could get a 2nd rounder for Stanzi's Hair."

sounds much more feasible than

"I think we could get a 2nd rounder for Stanzi."

Because its stupid

Why do you think Stanzi has any value, let alone 3rd round pick value? If he was worth that, wouldn't we keep him? Our QB's are pretty shitty, you know.

And monkeys might fly out of my ass.

To the troll asshole watchtower.

Why would anyone want a QB that isn't good enough to even play despite last year's QB abortion?

Also, where do you see WR Curvin Johnson going in the draft?

Stanzi is a wash but has been in the league for awhile. Chiefs will never use him and they have Tanney in the wings. I think they hold on to Tanney thinking he has more upside but as of now Stanzi has more trade value.

FYP

If you actually see this happening, you should lay off the shrooms.

Stanzi has zero value.

I want to ask you how much crack you smoked today, but I have to believe you're just doing a bit here. This isn't real, right?