ChiefsPlanet
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Williamson:Chiefs try to tackle position the right way (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=273535)

jAZ 06-02-2013 09:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bevischief (Post 9724738)
More crap from the Star and I am still waiting to show me wins at this point. Till then I am not buying this crap.
Everything brilliant about the CP draft commentary neatly rolled into 25 words. Full of win.

Mr. Laz 06-02-2013 09:50 AM
Quote:
The Chiefs weren’t alone in using a top pick on a player who will start his career at right tackle. Jacksonville took Texas A&M’s Luke Joeckel at No. 2, and Philadelphia took Oklahoma’s Lane Johnson at No. 4. They, too, are expected to start their NFL careers on the right side.
switching sides is going to ruin their careers!/CPdumbass

Cmd'r&Chief 06-02-2013 09:55 AM
Are we all neglecting to remember and read the latter part of this story? The initial hope was to trade Albert. They will put him on the left side this last year only , for 2 reasons. Because Albert is a whiney pussy. And because it will increase his trade value next year, as long as he doesn't get injured.

jAZ 06-02-2013 10:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cmd'r&Chief (Post 9725009)
Are we all neglecting to remember and read the latter part of this story? The initial hope was to trade Albert. They will put him on the left side this last year only , for 2 reasons. Because Albert is a whiney pussy. And because it will increase his trade value next year, as long as he doesn't get injured.
And give them a year to figure out the replacement player on the right if they end up going that route.

BossChief 06-02-2013 11:11 AM
3 of the NFLs stupidest teams over the last 5 years each spent top 5 picks on right tackles in the draft and that is supposed to validate those decisions?

Ok

BossChief 06-02-2013 11:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cmd'r&Chief (Post 9725009)
Are we all neglecting to remember and read the latter part of this story? The initial hope was to trade Albert. They will put him on the left side this last year only , for 2 reasons. Because Albert is a whiney pussy. And because it will increase his trade value next year, as long as he doesn't get injured.
Hahahahaha

If Albert doesn't sign an extension, he will be an unrestricted free agent next year. This season he turns 29 and next season he turns 30.

Who is gonna trade a pick higher than a third (what we get as a comp pick if he walks in free agency after this year) for a 30 year old (in football terms) left tackle?

Answer: nobody

Plus, the franchise tag will most likely be used on Justin Houston
After this season.

ChiefsCountry 06-02-2013 11:24 AM
Sure would be nice to have this read quarterback instead of tackle. Only the ****ing Chiefs.

OrtonsPiercedTaint 06-02-2013 11:34 AM
It's the creepy A.S. mushtache signature again. The Cat from Red Dwarf wants to know if Alex is a persian or a calico.

SAUTO 06-02-2013 12:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cmd'r&Chief (Post 9725009)
Are we all neglecting to remember and read the latter part of this story? The initial hope was to trade Albert. They will put him on the left side this last year only , for 2 reasons. Because Albert is a whiney pussy. And because it will increase his trade value next year, as long as he doesn't get injured.
Where did you read any of that?
Posted via Mobile Device

SAUTO 06-02-2013 12:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9725058)
Hahahahaha

If Albert doesn't sign an extension, he will be an unrestricted free agent next year. This season he turns 29 and next season he turns 30.

Who is gonna trade a pick higher than a third (what we get as a comp pick if he walks in free agency after this year) for a 30 year old (in football terms) left tackle?

Answer: nobody

Plus, the franchise tag will most likely be used on Justin Houston
After this season.
isn't Houston under contract next year?
Posted via Mobile Device

SAUTO 06-02-2013 12:25 PM
Yep we have him through next year.

Signed a four year deal
Posted via Mobile Device

bevischief 06-02-2013 12:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat Elvis (Post 9724760)
You do realize that the article is from ESPN don't you?
Don't care it still sucks balls. So biteme.

bevischief 06-02-2013 12:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dante84 (Post 9724778)
Espn, playa
4321

bevischief 06-02-2013 12:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikey23545 (Post 9724786)
You do realize the season hasn't started yet, right?
4321 Jack@@@

O.city 06-02-2013 01:33 PM
Just sign Albert and forget about the tackle spot for the next 5 years. We've got bigger fish to fry


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:36 PM.
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.