![]() |
And yes, I'm agreeing with BlackBob.
I need a ****ing shower. |
Quote:
As for Ford and Ealy... we'll see. Kiper talks to as many NFL teams as anyone, and right now they're both low-firsts. That could very well change -- as Murphy could, too. When they do, I probably will as well. |
Quote:
There's no ****ing way I'm drafting ANOTHER DE in the 1st round in hopes that they'll be able to generate 5 or 6 sacks a year TOPS. |
It's not about generating sacks. It's about getting push and pushing the QB from his spot. And, of course, shutting down the run, as TJax has done a good job of doing.
|
Quote:
Might as well take a guard if that's the case. |
Yes, "yet another." When we've spent 1st rounders at the 5-tech position exactly once since we made the switch, 5 years ago.
Once Tyson Jackson walks, we will have only 1 first round talent on our DL. That's now how Super Bowl defenses are typically built, Seahawks be damned. You don't go with "value" for your DL. You go with elite talent. |
Quote:
And second, that's not a position that requires a first round pick. Third, what elite talent? ROFL Stop bringing up the Seahawks. They're LOADED at every position, and they have playmakers at every level. This team has precious few playmakers at ANY level. We need playmakers. |
Brandin Cooks is Steve Smith? Please and thanks.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Hageman and Tuitt are great prospects. Lots of upside.
But once again, Chiefsplanet has turned them into "elite talent" before they've played a single ****ing down. |
Quote:
I think a playmaker on the DL is more valuable than anything other than a playmaker at qb. |
Quote:
I don't see real top shelf OLB/FS talent at #23 right now. |
Quote:
We aren't likely to get an "elite" talent at 23 anyway |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:56 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.