ChiefsPlanet
Page 2 of 6 1 2 3456
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs How Important Is An Interior Pass Rusher In Today's NFL? (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=282758)

OldSchool 04-03-2014 10:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeeingRed (Post 10536801)
JJ Watt got 20 rushing from a 3 technique so why is 10 so unreasonable? This kid has skills...put him on the field and he will produce. I hope....because it would help our defense a lot having an inside rushing presence. 15 sacks coming from inside (whether it be Catapano, Poe, Walker or a combo of them all) would allow Houston and Hali to destroy QBs from the outside. Of those 3 (not including Bailey because I just don't see him contributing in that way) Catapano is clearly the most talented rusher...so no, I don't believe 10 sacks or more from him is unreasonable at all actually. Hopefully I'm right. We'll see.
Because he's not JJ Watt and we don't know how explosive he will be after adding 20 pounds to his frame?

SeeingRed 04-03-2014 10:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10536784)
I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that you could count the number of teams that have done that, in the entirety of modern NFL history, on one hand.

In fact, it might never have been done.
its true...i realize that. However the game is constantly evolving and you are seeing more rushers coming from the inside now than there used to be. Before Watt no interior guys had 20 sacks either but more will come. If healthy Houston and Hali will both post double digit sacks...we know that. Imagine a 3rd guy doing it as well? It would make the defense dominant and I believe we have the personnel to do it. Catapano is better than most realize. Even if we got 8 (1 every other game) out of him it would go a long way.

The Franchise 04-03-2014 10:27 AM
Mike Catapano = JJ Watt
Sanders Commings = Ed Reed
Travis Kelce = Greatest TE evar!1!!!!1!11

OnTheWarpath15 04-03-2014 10:27 AM
http://oi34.tinypic.com/68u1wz.jpg

SeeingRed 04-03-2014 10:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 10536833)
Mike Catapano = JJ Watt
Sanders Commings = Ed Reed
Travis Kelce = Greatest TE evar!1!!!!1!11
Cmon now! :-/ I do think they all have potential but never said any of that. I especially think Catapano and Kelce have alot of potential but not saying that Pestilence. And you are taking my words out of context. I didnt say Catapano was Watt or would get 20 sacks BUT I believe the guy is very good. Also we have a UNIQUE situation in 2014 that we likely WONT have next year in that we have both Houston and Hali for the time being. Houston is in the prime of his career and is poised to have a shot at a career year. Even if Catapano (or Walker or Poe or whoever) can create a legitimate inside threat the studs we have on the outside can be even more effective. If Catapano gets 6 sacks but Houston breaks Strahan's record that would be pretty cool and I believe this is possible. But if not and we had 3 guys with double digit sacks it will create the same result.....and we wont be giving up 4 TD leads if this happens.

The Franchise 04-03-2014 10:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeeingRed (Post 10536896)
Cmon now! :-/ I do think they all have potential but never said any of that. I especially think Catapano and Kelce have alot of potential but not saying that Pestilence. And you are taking my words out of context. I didnt say Catapano was Watt or would get 20 sacks BUT I believe the guy is very good. Also we have a UNIQUE situation that we likely WONT have next year in that we have both Houston and Hali for the time being. Houston is in the prime of his career and is poised to have a shot at a career year. Even if Catapano (or Walker or Poe or whoever) can create a legitimate inside threat the studs we have on the outside can be even more effective. If Catapano gets 6 sacks but Houston breaks Strahan's record that would be pretty cool and I believe this is possible. But if not and we had 3 guys with double digit sacks it will create the same result.....and we wont be giving up 4 TD leads if this happens.
It was a joke.....calm it down.

You remind me a lot of my brother.

SeeingRed 04-03-2014 10:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 10536898)
It was a joke.....calm it down.

You remind me a lot of my brother.
lol....sorry :shake: still recovering from that damn Indy game i guess :rolleyes:

htismaqe 04-03-2014 10:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeeingRed (Post 10536911)
lol....sorry :shake: still recovering from that damn Indy game i guess :rolleyes:
You know what the upside is to being a jaded, crotchety old bastard like me?

I recovered from the Indy game about 5 minutes after it was over...

The Franchise 04-03-2014 10:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10536916)
You know what the upside is to being a jaded, crotchety old bastard like me?

I recovered from the Indy game about 5 minutes after it was over...
I can't wait to get there. It took me a good couple of days.

RealSNR 04-03-2014 10:51 AM
People act like I was a giant moron for trolling them with Terrence Copper mania for so many years, but was I really any different than the people who are predicting great things for people like Catapano, Kush, and Commings?

OnTheWarpath15 04-03-2014 10:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SNR (Post 10536929)
People act like I was a giant moron for trolling them with Terrence Copper mania for so many years, but was I really any different than the people who are predicting great things for people like Catapano, Kush, and Commings?
Actually, you were a lot different.

Copper was a helluva special teams player. He wasn't some unproven JAG.

htismaqe 04-03-2014 11:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 10536928)
I can't wait to get there. It took me a good couple of days.
To be honest, if it weren't for the 38-10 lead, I wouldn't have even had to recover. I went into the game expecting a loss.

DTLB58 04-03-2014 11:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10536784)
I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that you could count the number of teams that have done that, in the entirety of modern NFL history, on one hand.

In fact, it might never have been done.
I found 1 :thumb:
'84 Bears The year they got 72 as a team.
Richard Dent 17.5
Steve McMichael 10.0
Dan Hampton 11.5
http://www.pro-football-reference.co...s/chi/1984.htm

I would love to go back to some of the old-timer teams of the Rams,Giants, Bears and Packers but we all know they didn't start keeping this stat till '82.

htismaqe 04-03-2014 11:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DTLB58 (Post 10536997)
I found 1 :thumb:
'84 Bears The year they got 72 as a team.
Richard Dent 17.5
Steve McMichael 10.0
Dan Hampton 11.5
http://www.pro-football-reference.co...s/chi/1984.htm

I would love to go back to some of the old-timer teams of the Rams,Giants, Bears and Packers but we all know they didn't start keeping this stat till '82.
Not to mention the fact that those teams were built prior to Plan B free agency and the advent of the salary cap.

Kudos to you though for finding one!

Pablo 04-03-2014 11:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeeingRed (Post 10536773)
yes...all 3. This is my prediction. And IF it happens then we will win alot of games!
LMAO


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:21 PM.
Page 2 of 6 1 2 3456
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.