I feel like this may just be the run-off to see who gets to get steamrolled by Hawaii (even if Hawaii barely broke my top 10 for this thing - I just would not want to live there for the rest of my life...)

Colorado 100%

Throw out locations, property size and everything else, that Aspen home is probably my favorite house in the tournament. I love the open design. It looks clean but not sterile. It's elegant with tons of windows for natural lighting. I just love the look and feel.

That said, I don't believe I've voted for it a single time in the tourney. The remote location and the cold/snow would just be dealbreakers for me.

Maryland it is.

Which is funny, because that Hawaii house is remote and isolated from just about everything. That area has few really good restaurants, and shitty roads to try and get anywhere. The redneck ratio is reminiscent of the Ozark backwoods. The big island has a few good beaches, but for the most part it isn't a great beach island as it is too "new" of an island that is actually still in the process of growing.

I mean, it's a nice place to live. I have a college buddy who lives not far from there. Just not somewhere I'd want to live year round.

I think me too. That house is to die for.

That's the thing some of the cruddiest locations had fantastic houses. Everybody hates Alabama, but that was a fantastic house by my taste. Probably the best kitchen in the whole outfit was the Missouri house.

Went with Maryland based on house and property. I actually ingnored the stipend throughout the tournament, for the most part. (Sorry Rain Man.) The only time I factored it in was if I felt major renovations were necessary for my personal tastes.

That's an interesting point that I hadn't thought about. One can argue that the most expensive houses in any state are probably going to be the most amazing houses in less than ideal locations, or less amazing houses in fantastic locations. Of course, that's all relative because all of these houses are going to be nice.

From a mathematical perspective, one would expect the most expensive houses to be amazing houses in amazing places, but maybe if you're building in those amazing places you don't have to have an amazing house.

Or alternatively, on a statewide basis you have a lot of states that by definition don't have the truly amazing places. They'll have lower prices, and therefore it's easier to build an amazing house.

When the tournament ends, I'll ask people to pick their most amazing house without regards to anything else, and ask them what their top pick would be under the current rules.

CO for me. House is significantly more appealing to my tastes, and I'm a big snowboarder. If I can't live at the beach, give me the mountains, all day.

Hoping for a CO vs Tahoe final, but have a feeling both those houses might lose in the semis.

<div class="tenor-gif-embed" data-postid="5961432" data-share-method="host" data-aspect-ratio="1.73077" data-width="50%"><a href="https://tenor.com/view/damnyou-damn-the-office-dwight-gif-5961432">Damn You GIF</a>from <a href="https://tenor.com/search/damnyou-gifs">Damnyou GIFs</a></div> <script type="text/javascript" async src="https://tenor.com/embed.js"></script>

Colorado. I have friends and customers in the valley. Would feel like I am still at home

ROFL

You’re killing me.

That being said. Early bird gets the worm. :Poke:

Maryland. Stipend, milder climate, and access to DC make an easy choice.

This one was tough.... had I looked at the other two, I might have voted Maryland as it's the only one left near major metro areas. Colorado (and Hawaii) are two that have enough outdoorsy stuff that more than makes up for it though.

Just say no to the east coast area. Colorado it is.

Both are awesome properties... but the stipend actually won me over too.