Absolutely nuts. Wow.

That's not what's happening here, though.

I'd imagine he felt like the Rams with Ramsey were probably somewhere between 15-ish range and the Dolphins without Ramsey were somewhere in the 15-ish range as well. If that's the case then I can see Ramsey tilting the scales and sending the the Dolphins to 1 and Rams to 32.

Even without knowing where he had either team ranked prior to the Ramsey trade, I won't disagree with the Rams being at 32 and the Dolphins being at 1.

The Rams are looking at a big oof there. I don't follow college ball but I don't know any of their CBs.

Their whole defense is basically going to be Aaron Donald and a bunch of scrubs. I wonder if Donald's heart is even in it anymore..

The Dolphins have a salary cap, don't they?

The Chargers ranking was the one I had the biggest issue with.

JC Jackson has been a bad signing thus far and Michael Davis' play has been declining.

I don't think I'd swap groups with anyone above us on the list, although Philly might be close. That's pretty amazing.

Side Note - Chiefs lead the NFL in QB spending at $42,475,881.

****ing bargain.

Eagles are spending $27,081,385 at CB for 2023

I know. Their top 2 are expensive, which is why I still prefer ours. Their depth is as solid as ours, most likely.

I agree, but we have people like Mike Florio that want to make a big stink about how the Chiefs have to do something about Mahomes contract.

Ramsey may be the most overrated player in the entire NFL. It's honestly ridiculous.

And it's worth every penny.

A bargain for multiple Super Bowl victories.

It would actually be really interesting for someone to come up with composite scores for each team’s position groups then also have a separate score for the investment in each.

Compiling the two scores together would tell you who was the most efficient in their spending. Lots of subjectivity in that thought.