ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs John Dorsey coming up next on NFL Network (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=270280)

siberian khatru 02-22-2013 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 9425539)
If he doesn't win in the next 3 years, just wait - he'll get that 'arrogant prick' tag just as badly as ***** did.

It's just something worth watching, that's all. If he handles everyone like that, he's going to have some unhappy staff and I'd really hate to see that. I think that's part of the problem with the ***** regime, that poison atmosphere really does trickle down to all parts of the team, including the roster. I hope we don't have that again, even if it's by accident.

I'll just wait for Whitlock to take him out to dinner.

Chiefs Pantalones 02-22-2013 12:43 PM

Did Dorsey have baby Jack introduce him?

Hammock Parties 02-22-2013 12:44 PM

lol

@Jacobs71
Asked Dorsey what skill set does a QB need to be successful in their system. His response: "Win" #Chiefs #NFLCombine

Titty Meat 02-22-2013 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoWalrus (Post 9425629)
lol

@Jacobs71
Asked Dorsey what skill set does a QB need to be successful in their system. His response: "Win" #Chiefs #NFLCombine

Guess that eliminates geno

'Hamas' Jenkins 02-22-2013 12:49 PM

Dorsey may get an arrogant prick tag, but it will be impossible for it to equal Pioli's. That one who sucks the penis is the most arrogant mother****er I've ever come across in any sport.

The dinner, the scouts in the first draft, Jackson, The Right 53, it's literally insurmountable.

htismaqe 02-22-2013 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy (Post 9425616)
I agree with you and DJ. No negotiation necessary...make Jackson an offer, if he says no, kick him to the curb.

Yep.

htismaqe 02-22-2013 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 9425638)
Dorsey may get an arrogant prick tag, but it will be impossible for it to equal *****'s. That one who sucks the penis is the most arrogant mother****er I've ever come across in any sport.

The dinner, the scouts in the first draft, Jackson, The Right 53, it's literally insurmountable.

Dude, don't forget the candy wrappers, the locks on the doors, the black and white copiers.

There's no way Dorsey could EVER be as bad. NO WAY.

DeezNutz 02-22-2013 12:55 PM

All of these guys at 1 Arrowhead are arrogant. This is a given.

***** was ****ing abrasive, though, and I don't get that vibe from Dorsey. He's just fumbles around a bit. Example: He explicitly said that he needed to gather his thoughts and then proceeded to compose the most incomprehensible sentence I've heard uttered in some time.

htismaqe 02-22-2013 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9425655)
All of these guys at 1 Arrowhead are arrogant. This is a given.

***** was ****ing abrasive, though, and I don't get that vibe from Dorsey. He's just fumbles around a bit.

See, I think Dorsey is kind of abrasive.

I don't see Pioli as abrasive.

Devious. Conniving. But not abrasive.

Dorsey is basically the polar opposite of Pioli.

noa 02-22-2013 12:58 PM

He doesn't grate on me as much as he does on some other people here. He just seems relatively new to it, and I'm sure he'll get better as he goes. He definitely needs a new pair of glasses, though.
Posted via Mobile Device

DeezNutz 02-22-2013 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9425658)
See, I think Dorsey is kind of abrasive.

I don't see ***** as abrasive.

Devious. Conniving. But not abrasive.

Dorsey is basically the polar opposite of *****.

Huh. Not even Pioli's response questions? For example, Kietzman asked him about the "top 2 QBs" in last year's draft, using that exact phrase.

Pioli's response: "Theeeeeee top 2 QBs.....?"

Yes, you stupid mother****er. Quit feigning ignorance and answer the mother****ing question or have the ****ing balls to say that you don't want to answer it.

htismaqe 02-22-2013 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9425667)
Huh. Not even *****'s response questions? For example, Kietzman asked him about the "top 2 QBs" in last year's draft, using that exact phrase.

*****'s response: "Theeeeeee top 2 QBs.....?"

Yes, you stupid mother****er. Quit feigning ignorance and answer the mother****ing question or have the ****ing balls to say that you don't want to answer it.

I don't see that as "abrasive" as in brash.

I see that as flat out arrogant and condescending.

PaulAllen 02-22-2013 01:09 PM

SCOTT ON TV NOW.

HATE METER RISING

PaulAllen 02-22-2013 01:11 PM

NFL Network executive: "You know what guys, I think for our draft coverage we should probably go and get the guy who just got fired and has maybe the worst draft record in the last 4 years. What do you think?"

NFL Network underlings: "Great idea boss!"

PaulAllen 02-22-2013 01:13 PM

Scott: Geno not worthy at #1. Maybe not even at 11-20

HAHA kick rocks douche!

htismaqe 02-22-2013 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PaulAllen (Post 9425701)
Scott: Geno not worthy at #1. Maybe not even at 11-20

HAHA kick rocks douche!

So glad he's gone.

He was fully prepared to take Joeckel.

DJ's left nut 02-22-2013 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9425658)
See, I think Dorsey is kind of abrasive.

I don't see ***** as abrasive.

Devious. Conniving. But not abrasive.

Dorsey is basically the polar opposite of *****.

Yeah...I could see him being abrasive.

I'll be honest, if I worked closely with him, we'd have some '**** you' moments. And those aren't always a bad thing if they're done among guys with a great deal of respect for each other.

That was Pioli's downfall, IMO. He didn't have any respect for anyone so when you gave him back what he was giving you, he made it his mission in life to make you miserable. If Dorsey can take what he'll give out, it will work.

But he's going to have to work with strong personalities, IMO, because he definitely has a command approach to things and that's going to crater some folks if they're not cut out for it.

RyFo18 02-22-2013 01:19 PM

If you missed the interview, here you go:

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/_Kj3LAPjzfA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

ChiefsCountry 02-22-2013 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 9425638)
Dorsey may get an arrogant prick tag, but it will be impossible for it to equal *****'s. That one who sucks the penis is the most arrogant mother****er I've ever come across in any sport.

The dinner, the scouts in the first draft, Jackson, The Right 53, it's literally insurmountable.

You forgot the worst one - Cassel.

nychief 02-22-2013 01:21 PM

honestly, who gives a shit how this guy sounds? He sounds like an ex-football player/coach/scout... He isn't a presidential spokesperson.

O.city 02-22-2013 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 9425716)
Yeah...I could see him being abrasive.

I'll be honest, if I worked closely with him, we'd have some '**** you' moments. And those aren't always a bad thing if they're done among guys with a great deal of respect for each other.

That was *****'s downfall, IMO. He didn't have any respect for anyone so when you gave him back what he was giving you, he made it his mission in life to make you miserable. If Dorsey can take what he'll give out, it will work.

But he's going to have to work with strong personalities, IMO, because he definitely has a command approach to things and that's going to crater some folks if they're not cut out for it.

TBH, it's probably set up for Reid to be the face and Dorsey to be the shadow guy. Unlike Pioli, who said he wanted that, Dorsey seems to be more ok with that.

Hopefully.

Mr. Laz 02-22-2013 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9425733)
TBH, it's probably set up for Reid to be the face and Dorsey to be the shadow guy. Unlike *****, who said he wanted that, Dorsey seems to be more ok with that.

Hopefully.

wait ... people bitched when he didn't talk enough because the fans felt ignored and disrespected.

Now you are saying he 'mislead' people when he said he didn't want to be the media guy?

ChiefsCountry 02-22-2013 01:28 PM

Are biggest problem is we are too used to Carl Peterson, who was pretty good in front of the camera and in the PR game.

The Bad Guy 02-22-2013 01:28 PM

I know people in the Chiefs building that say Dorsey has been the complete opposite of SP. They say he shakes everyone's hand, talks to people like people and is very down to earth.

I have a college friend who works for the Packers and he said he's one of the nicest guys he's met.

I think his on-camer persona is awkward because he's not comfortable in front of it.

mr. tegu 02-22-2013 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoWalrus (Post 9425470)
Talking up Poe.

So no Star Liutoitlkejraoijel;kdfad.

O.city 02-22-2013 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 9425738)
wait ... people bitched when he didn't talk enough because the fans felt ignored and disrespected.

Now you are saying he 'mislead' people when he said he didn't want to be the media guy?

Wait are you still taking up for the guy?


He always talked about wanting to not be the spotlight, that it wasn't the GM"s job. Yet who was always on camera?

The Bad Guy 02-22-2013 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9425752)
Wait are you still taking up for the guy?


He always talked about wanting to not be the spotlight, that it wasn't the GM"s job. Yet who was always on camera?

Yep. He always said it was his job to be out of the spotlight. That was the HC's job.

Don't mind Laz. Rational takes aren't part of his catalog.

Gravedigger 02-22-2013 01:33 PM

At least he's doing interviews and not that, "the head coach is the face of the franchise" bullshit that Pioli used as a gimmick to not talk to the fans or media.

htismaqe 02-22-2013 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 9425747)
I know people in the Chiefs building that say Dorsey has been the complete opposite of SP. They say he shakes everyone's hand, talks to people like people and is very down to earth.

I have a college friend who works for the Packers and he said he's one of the nicest guys he's met.

I think his on-camer persona is awkward because he's not comfortable in front of it.

This is the way I see it.

B14ckmon 02-22-2013 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gravedigger (Post 9425768)
At least he's doing interviews and not that, "the head coach is the face of the franchise" bullshit that ***** used as a gimmick to not talk to the fans or media.

What?

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-combine

They are interviewing every GM.

Mike in SW-MO 02-22-2013 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9425609)
If the Chiefs can sign Jackson to a 3 year contract for about $3 million per, I'd be thrilled. If he wants more, he can walk.

I doubt the NFLPA will approve any contract with less $ than the current one. I like 2 year extension with some combination of signing bonus & third year ballon adding up to $14 mil. Puts cap around 4.33 per year.

That's a little high for his production, but not totally out of whack. I would not be surprised to see him released, make a FA tour then wind up back here.

mnchiefsguy 02-22-2013 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike in SW-MO (Post 9425811)
I doubt the NFLPA will approve any contract with less $ than the current one. I like 2 year extension with some combination of signing bonus & third year ballon adding up to $14 mil. Puts cap around 4.33 per year.

That's a little high for his production, but not totally out of whack. I would not be surprised to see him released, make a FA tour then wind up back here.

The NFLPA can kiss John Dorsey's ass. They may not like the offer, but there is nothing they can do if Jackson agrees to it.

Jackson is probably gone though. Either way, I am not losing any sleep over it.

O.city 02-22-2013 02:13 PM

Tyler Dunne ‏@TyDunne
McCarthy on John Dorsey: Always referred to him as Paul Harvey with how he asked questions. ...He's a grinder. He's a hard worker

DaneMcCloud 02-22-2013 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike in SW-MO (Post 9425811)
I doubt the NFLPA will approve any contract with less $ than the current one. I like 2 year extension with some combination of signing bonus & third year ballon adding up to $14 mil. Puts cap around 4.33 per year.

That's a little high for his production, but not totally out of whack. I would not be surprised to see him released, make a FA tour then wind up back here.

Since when does the NFLPA have any say in player compensation?

Players are worth what a team decides to pay.

siberian khatru 02-22-2013 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 9425747)
I know people in the Chiefs building that say Dorsey has been the complete opposite of SP. They say he shakes everyone's hand, talks to people like people and is very down to earth.

I have a college friend who works for the Packers and he said he's one of the nicest guys he's met.

I think his on-camer persona is awkward because he's not comfortable in front of it.

It's the smooth ones you gotta watch out for.

Mike in SW-MO 02-22-2013 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9425913)
Since when does the NFLPA have any say in player compensation?

Players are worth what a team decides to pay.

I could be wrong, but I have always been under the impression contracts could be disapproved by the NFLPA. Similar to league review of trades.

Part and parcel of collective bargaining. It is not just you and the team. If you take a pay cut, it affects the other players future pay as well. NFLPA no likey.

Dayze 02-22-2013 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 9425638)
Dorsey may get an arrogant prick tag, but it will be impossible for it to equal *****'s. That one who sucks the penis is the most arrogant mother****er I've ever come across in any sport.

The dinner, the scouts in the first draft, Jackson, The Right 53, it's literally insurmountable.

:hmmm: what was that incident?

PaulAllen 02-22-2013 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dayze (Post 9425970)
:hmmm: what was that incident?

The dinner with Scott, Haley, and some local journalists including Whitlock. It was apparently the first eye opener that they got up close and personal.

RustShack 02-22-2013 02:43 PM

Don't get me wrong, I want to keep Jackson. He's good, just not elite. If he's not willing to take a reasonable pay cut, then cut him. Try signing him after he talks to a few teams and sees what his market is. If they are also offering him too much, then let him go. But I don't see that happening, and if he wants a starting job his best bet is coming back here IMO.

Easy 6 02-22-2013 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9425893)
Tyler Dunne ‏@TyDunne
McCarthy on John Dorsey: Always referred to him as Paul Harvey with how he asked questions. ...He's a grinder. He's a hard worker.

NOOOOOO

DORSEY IS THE MATT CASSEL OF GM'S!

NOOOOOO

Titty Meat 02-22-2013 02:55 PM

Nobody gave a shit about Piolis personality when we were winning in 2010 and nobody should give a shit about Dorseys as long as the team is winning.

SAUTO 02-22-2013 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike in SW-MO (Post 9425811)
I doubt the NFLPA will approve any contract with less $ than the current one. I like 2 year extension with some combination of signing bonus & third year ballon adding up to $14 mil. Puts cap around 4.33 per year.

That's a little high for his production, but not totally out of whack. I would not be surprised to see him released, make a FA tour then wind up back here.

Mike Vick
Posted via Mobile Device

DaWolf 02-22-2013 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 9425747)
I know people in the Chiefs building that say Dorsey has been the complete opposite of SP. They say he shakes everyone's hand, talks to people like people and is very down to earth.

I have a college friend who works for the Packers and he said he's one of the nicest guys he's met.

I think his on-camer persona is awkward because he's not comfortable in front of it.

That's what I gathered as well before we hired him, based on all of the comments about him from people who have worked with him. The entire scouting world apparently loves this guy, he is friends with a lot of people around the league, and he is down to earth and friendly and doesn't BS you as a person.

But being in the scouting background for all of those years, the media isn't exactly his No 1 priority, and he has learned from his previous employers that you must keep your cards close to your vest, so he's going to come off as dry and boring to the media, at least during the draft season.

The bottom line with this guy (or any guy) will be wins...

SAUTO 02-22-2013 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike in SW-MO (Post 9425941)
I could be wrong, but I have always been under the impression contracts could be disapproved by the NFLPA. Similar to league review of trades.

Part and parcel of collective bargaining. It is not just you and the team. If you take a pay cut, it affects the other players future pay as well. NFLPA no likey.

yeah you are wrong.

Vick went from a multi year deal in which he would get over 15 million this season to a one year deal worth 10 with only 3.5 guaranteed.
Posted via Mobile Device

DJ's left nut 02-22-2013 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 9425976)
Don't get me wrong, I want to keep Jackson. He's good, just not elite. If he's not willing to take a reasonable pay cut, then cut him. Try signing him after he talks to a few teams and sees what his market is. If they are also offering him too much, then let him go. But I don't see that happening, and if he wants a starting job his best bet is coming back here IMO.

Here's the thing, though - he's of no added value to the Chiefs. He has no experience in our system, he's not ever been discussed as a leader in the lockerroom. He's just another guy and if he were a FA, he wouldn't be a guy we looked at highly because he's never operated in a 1-gap and his skills aren't particularly well-suited for it.

So if he goes to the market, I'd let him just come back to us because he'd lose several ties for me.

O.city 02-22-2013 03:26 PM

Jackson's a meh guy. Every team has them, have to to fill some spots. Although if it came down to him or a guy like Sopoagoa from SF, yeah, sorry Tyson, we've decided to go another direction.

OnTheWarpath15 02-22-2013 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9425651)
Dude, don't forget the candy wrappers, the locks on the doors, the black and white copiers.

There's no way Dorsey could EVER be as bad. NO WAY.

And my personal favorite, the media needing an escort to use the pisser.

htismaqe 02-22-2013 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9426136)
And my personal favorite, the media needing an escort to use the pisser.

They're going to reveal our secrets!

Buehler445 02-22-2013 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 9426073)
Here's the thing, though - he's of no added value to the Chiefs. He has no experience in our system, he's not ever been discussed as a leader in the lockerroom. He's just another guy and if he were a FA, he wouldn't be a guy we looked at highly because he's never operated in a 1-gap and his skills aren't particularly well-suited for it.

So if he goes to the market, I'd let him just come back to us because he'd lose several ties for me.

Well, he's got some potential maybe. IIRC he was slated to go 10-25 when numb nuts picked him 3. He's worth trying to restructure. Maybe playing outside of Crennels shitty system he can do some good.


Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9426136)
And my personal favorite, the media needing an escort to use the pisser.

Mandating that all blinds in the building be shut was mine. Like teams were going to steal the plays. THAT is why Cassel sucked.

DeezNutz 02-22-2013 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9426136)
And my personal favorite, the media needing an escort to use the pisser.

Blinds down, bitch.

mcaj22 02-22-2013 04:03 PM

my personal favorite was watching the GM pass on pure talent with red flags and having a player on the roster he spent years and resources on to try to cover up with consoling and sweep it under the rug and it was the biggest player with red flag issues the NFL has seen probably ever.

hes promoting "character" to the public and behind close doors that was far from the truth he had the biggest group of trouble makers ive seen on the Chiefs in years

Tribal Warfare 02-22-2013 04:12 PM

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/sIVUGZlwisQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Fritz88 02-22-2013 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9425577)
To me, I see the stereotypical stupid jock. Now, I don't think he's an idiot, but it's clear that he struggles to maintain "GM speak" in front of the mic; he fumbles around so damn much that he makes me feel embarrassed for him.

In his first press I sensed his dickness.

I am thinking that if Hunt had interviewed Dorsey before Ried, Dorsey wouldnt have made the cut. Ried sold him to Hunt.


We'll know in a few months I guess but I'd ****ing hate it to have him as my boss.
Posted via Mobile Device

Mike in SW-MO 02-22-2013 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 9426011)
yeah you are wrong.

Vick went from a multi year deal in which he would get over 15 million this season to a one year deal worth 10 with only 3.5 guaranteed.
Posted via Mobile Device

I got over it last time I was wrong.
I probably will get over it this time, too. :(

I'm not sure how this all fits in the discussion, though:

"According to Jeff McLane of the Philadelphia Inquirer, Vick has signed a three-year contract which, for salary cap purposes, will void to a one-year deal on March 15."
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-sh...8687--nfl.html

Technically, there are 2 more years in the contract for review purposes. It's game playing since, like Jackson's $14.5M salary year, they will never be paid.

SAUTO 02-22-2013 04:28 PM

So it's a one year deal.
Posted via Mobile Device

SAUTO 02-22-2013 04:30 PM

And it went from over 15 to Max 10.
Posted via Mobile Device

Dunerdr 02-22-2013 04:38 PM

Pioli=sleezy car salesman at a high end dealership.
Dorsey= guy sweatin balls in the shop making custop parts for our new red hotrod.
Customer service means less when your putting the best car on the road. Give the guy time to acclimate to his position. And judge him by the talent on the field. And big Andy by the overall play.

mcaj22 02-22-2013 04:40 PM

you will get the same interview responses from Andy no matter the record, so get used to it. He has his interviewing down to a script and just rolls it out like a robot, will never reveal true feelings about a player or the success or failures of a season. he will always take the blame lol

TribalElder 02-22-2013 04:51 PM

Hopefully someday they will build a statue of this guy for all the trophies he brought to KC

King_Chief_Fan 02-22-2013 04:52 PM

There is no bigger collection of arrogant asses than CP

Dave Lane 02-22-2013 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King_Chief_Fan (Post 9426281)
There is no bigger collection of arrogant asses than CP

What a very christian attitude of you. You set a shinning example.

Frankie 02-22-2013 05:34 PM

With all the discussion about Ty_Jax here, consider this. We will most likely evolve into a 43 D during the next several years. So I bet Ty_Jax and his expensive contract are the least acceptable to Dorsey. More than just one incentive to let him walk.

htismaqe 02-22-2013 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie (Post 9426354)
We will most likely evolve into a 43 D during the next several years.

That's an interesting idea. Not really supported by the evidence, though.

RINGLEADER 02-22-2013 06:07 PM

If I had to guess I think we bring in a vet arm, let Albert go, sign Joeckel with the first, and tag Bowe again. Later in the draft we get the young arm. Somewhere in there we probably get Colquitt re-signed as well...

htismaqe 02-22-2013 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RINGLEADER (Post 9426439)
If I had to guess I think we bring in a vet arm, let Albert go, sign Joeckel with the first, and tag Bowe again. Later in the draft we get the young arm. Somewhere in there we probably get Colquitt re-signed as well...

Scott Pioli isn't the GM anymore.

Dave Lane 02-22-2013 06:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RINGLEADER (Post 9426439)
If I had to guess I think we bring in a vet arm, let Albert go, sign Joeckel with the first, and tag Bowe again. Later in the draft we get the young arm. Somewhere in there we probably get Colquitt re-signed as well...

What a horrific consequence to a 2-14 season.

Bewbies 02-22-2013 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9426358)
That's an interesting idea. Not really supported by the evidence, though.

Could be a reply to almost every Frankie post. ROFL

Frankie 02-22-2013 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9426358)
That's an interesting idea. Not really supported by the evidence, though.

Our GM and HC are now from a 43 background. I'm just guessing that's their preferred style in the long run. Except, unlike the fool Piolli, they are not going to try to change everything right away. I wouldn't be surprised if we will be easing into a 43 oriented defensive roster maybe within the next few years.

Just speculation on my part, but considering history.

Frankie 02-22-2013 10:56 PM

And oh, BTW, I wish people would read their own body of posts before they'd laugh at others'.

htismaqe 02-22-2013 10:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie (Post 9427227)
Our GM and HC are now from a 43 background. I'm just guessing that's their preferred style in the long run. Except, unlike the fool Piolli, they are not going to try to change everything right away. I wouldn't be surprised if we will be easing into a 43 oriented defensive roster maybe within the next few years.

Just speculation on my part, but considering history.

The Packers run a 1-gap 3-4. Just FYI.

And they hired a defensive coordinator that, while versed in the 4-3, has spent the majority of his quite long career in the 3-4.

O.city 02-22-2013 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie (Post 9427259)
And oh, BTW, I wish people would read their own body of posts before they'd laugh at others'.

I wish people would quit making posts that make me laugh.

NJChiefsFan 02-23-2013 01:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by noa (Post 9425663)
He doesn't grate on me as much as he does on some other people here. He just seems relatively new to it, and I'm sure he'll get better as he goes. He definitely needs a new pair of glasses, though.
Posted via Mobile Device

Agreed, on all accounts.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.