ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   A request to the BB membership regarding Chiefs4me. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=119347)

Chiefs Pantalones 07-11-2005 08:09 PM

She should be banned if she doesn't show the BB a picture of her boobs.

Don't be mad at me, I don't make the rules...

Logical 07-11-2005 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia
What we really need to do is find a sub-forum in which she is most interested. It worked before.

ROFLROFLROFL I only wonder which of a couple people you might be inferring. Yeah right.

Hammock Parties 07-11-2005 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man
You mean gonechiefs?

ghostchiefs

HemiEd 07-11-2005 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Special Ed
She should be banned if she doesn't show the BB a picture of her boobs.

Don't be mad at me, I don't make the rules...


Probably garner a lot of votes, he he. ROFL

Logical 07-11-2005 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Special Ed
She should be banned if she doesn't show the BB a picture of her boobs.

Don't be mad at me, I don't make the rules...

I will wait until she does before I decide if I am mad at you.

Saulbadguy 07-11-2005 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia
What we really need to do is find a sub-forum in which she is most interested. It worked before.

Thats a good idea, Phil. Set up the "How much money does your husband make?" sub-forum.

Hammock Parties 07-11-2005 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Special Ed
She should be banned if she doesn't show the BB a picture of her boobs.

Don't be mad at me, I don't make the rules...

From the picture she posted I am not sure her boobs are suitable for the BB.

Phil could just put her on board-wide ignore. I bet she wouldn't even realize no one could read her replies.

Phobia 07-11-2005 08:12 PM

FWIW, I'm all for this effort. The smear the queer game with her is growing tiresome. It isn't productive. I think I understand the dynamic, but it doesn't reflect well for those lurkers who are considering becoming active. I know we like to initiate some of our noobs to thicken their skin and eliminate the whiners but Chiefs4me has proven to be undaunted by the initiation. It may be time for the pile-on boys to drop her into their iggy list and let her sink or swim on her own.

FWIW, these are the observations of a fellow member, not the mandate of a mod.

stevieray 07-11-2005 08:12 PM

don't know, don't care...never got involved.

|Zach| 07-11-2005 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vlad Logicslav
I completely agree with everything you say. However, from what I can tell maybe she is not as thick skinned as she wants everyone to believe. So even if she were to make an effort (definitely no reason to believe yet that will occur) I see others still likely to dogpile for the past and don't think initially she would instantly become thick skinned. Like I said to Saulbadguy I really do not believe she is going to leave (at least completely), though I doubt if banned she would be as clever or persistent as gochiefs was.

Even a 100% turn around would require ALOT of thick skin on her part. GC has been a great board member for a long time and there are still people who go out of their way to bait him or rip on him based on his past. I would be very very suprised to see discipline on her part in that regard.

Iowanian 07-11-2005 08:14 PM

sorry logical, but I have no intention of buying a Robe, because threadwrecker comes into the locker room at showertime, and then is offended that she sees some Man-banana.

Screw you guys, I'm going out to the pool in my thong with my Son's friends.

Jenny Gump 07-11-2005 08:15 PM

Ok. I have for the most part, remained quiet when it came to C4Me. But here is my honest and open take...

At first, she got on my nerves, but I had no good reason for it, or at least I couldn't articulate it. Hell, I get on a lot of nerves too...so what? I could live with it.

Then I started observing how she would jump in the middle of a thread and make it about her. Now...I'm all about narcissism...I mean, look at me, but I try to be a little self-depricating about it. Still...no big deal. Fun times.

Then, it seemed she started playing the "female" card more and more. I didn't read the threads closely, so I didn't and still don't feel too educated enough to draw a conclusion regarding fairness. However, recently, she made some comments about other female posters being suck ups. I have to assume, since there are like a whole 8-10 of us vaginal types, she was lumping me in there. Like Mer, I may be talking out my ass here, but let's just go with that assumption. That ain't right. If you describe getting along with others, and having spirited conversation from time to time as sucking up...then you need to redefine the phrase.

Then, I saw the thread about the 5 greatest Chiefs of all time, and had to nearly break my fingers not to respond. She jumped into the middle of a conversation between one man who picked Eric Hicks and another man who was giving him legitimate, educated shit about it. It was blatant, defensive, and I thought a little odd. Then she immediately pulled the female card. Boo hoo. These guys were only challenging her to back up her picks. Instead of defending her picks, she started boohooing about being a woman and liking football. Whatever.

Now, I for one, don't post a lot about the football stuff. I don't keep up with all the stats, but when I find something I want to voice my opinion on, I will. But, I recognize my limitations. Doesn't mean I love football any less than the best statistician here...just means I don't have all the stats memorized. It's more of a game of emotion for me...and yes...I'm gonna dare say it...feminists be damned...it's prolly cause I am a...eek...female.

In other words, if you are gonna bring your "game" to the board...be ready to back it up. I really think that's all the dudes were getting at in the first place. Ain't nothing wrong with that...it's a football board afterall.

Finally, if I am going to be transparent and completely honest, I have to also say, that it does seem like there are times that she gets piled on for no real obvious reason. I don't for a second, think it's because she's a chick, but rather because of her track record with the annoyance factor.

I'm against banning her. But if you are reading this C4Me, seriously, try lightening up a bit. I'm not patronizing you...or putting you down, but everything doesn't have to be about you being mistreated.

Logical 07-11-2005 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Iowanian
sorry logical, but I have no intention of buying a Robe, because threadwrecker comes into the locker room at showertime, and then is offended that she sees some Man-banana.

Screw you guys, I'm going out to the pool in my thong with my Son's friends.

:eek: I don't know about the rest of you but if Pete does that I am farting in his general direction.

|Zach| 07-11-2005 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JennyGump
Ok. I have for the most part, remained quiet when it came to C4Me. But here is my honest and open take...

At first, she got on my nerves, but I had no good reason for it, or at least I couldn't articulate it. Hell, I get on a lot of nerves too...so what? I could live with it.

Then I started observing how she would jump in the middle of a thread and make it about her. Now...I'm all about narcissism...I mean, look at me, but I try to be a little self-depricating about it. Still...no big deal. Fun times.

Then, it seemed she started playing the "female" card more and more. I didn't read the threads closely, so I didn't and still don't feel too educated enough to draw a conclusion regarding fairness. However, recently, she made some comments about other female posters being suck ups. I have to assume, since there are like a whole 8-10 of us vaginal types, she was lumping me in there. Like Mer, I may be talking out my ass here, but let's just go with that assumption. That ain't right. If you describe getting along with others, and having spirited conversation from time to time as sucking up...then you need to redefine the phrase.

Then, I saw the thread about the 5 greatest Chiefs of all time, and had to nearly break my fingers not to respond. She jumped into the middle of a conversation between one man who picked Eric Hicks and another man who was giving him legitimate, educated shit about it. It was blatant, defensive, and I thought a little odd. Then she immediately pulled the female card. Boo hoo. These guys were only challenging her to back up her picks. Instead of defending her picks, she started boohooing about being a woman and liking football. Whatever.

Now, I for one, don't post a lot about the football stuff. I don't keep up with all the stats, but when I find something I want to voice my opinion on, I will. But, I recognize my limitations. Doesn't mean I love football any less than the best statistician here...just means I don't have all the stats memorized. It's more of a game of emotion for me...and yes...I'm gonna dare say it...feminists be damned...it's prolly cause I am a...eek...female.

In other words, if you are gonna bring your "game" to the board...be ready to back it up. I really think that's all the dudes were getting at in the first place. Ain't nothing wrong with that...it's a football board afterall.

Finally, if I am going to be transparent and completely honest, I have to also say, that it does seem like there are times that she gets piled on for no real obvious reason. I don't for a second, think it's because she's a chick, but rather because of her track record with the annoyance factor.

I'm against banning her. But if you are reading this C4Me, seriously, try lightening up a bit. I'm not patronizing you...or putting you down, but everything doesn't have to be about you being mistreated.


Good post...

Drop me that e-mail so I can hook you up.

Logical 07-11-2005 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gochiefs
From the picture she posted I am not sure her boobs are suitable for the BB.

Phil could just put her on board-wide ignore. I bet she wouldn't even realize no one could read her replies.

;) wondering how gochiefs ever came up with this idea.ROFL

Logical 07-11-2005 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZachKC
Even a 100% turn around would require ALOT of thick skin on her part. GC has been a great board member for a long time and there are still people who go out of their way to bait him or rip on him based on his past. I would be very very suprised to see discipline on her part in that regard.

You really do have a valid point.

Phobia 07-11-2005 08:19 PM

Outstanding post JennyGump.

Insert obligatory innuendo here.

Mr. Kotter 07-11-2005 08:20 PM

eh, wow...

Chiefs Pantalones 07-11-2005 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gochiefs
From the picture she posted I am not sure her boobs are suitable for the BB.

Phil could just put her on board-wide ignore. I bet she wouldn't even realize no one could read her replies.

ROFL

4th and Long 07-11-2005 08:22 PM

I figure the board has an iggy function for a reason. If she really irritates you that much and you're not smart enough to use that functions, then shut your cake hole and suffer the consequences.

Logical 07-11-2005 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JennyGump
Ok. I have for the most part, remained quiet when it came to C4Me. But here is my honest and open take...

At first, she got on my nerves, but I had no good reason for it, or at least I couldn't articulate it. Hell, I get on a lot of nerves too...so what? I could live with it.

Then I started observing how she would jump in the middle of a thread and make it about her. Now...I'm all about narcissism...I mean, look at me, but I try to be a little self-depricating about it. Still...no big deal. Fun times.

Then, it seemed she started playing the "female" card more and more. I didn't read the threads closely, so I didn't and still don't feel too educated enough to draw a conclusion regarding fairness. However, recently, she made some comments about other female posters being suck ups. I have to assume, since there are like a whole 8-10 of us vaginal types, she was lumping me in there. Like Mer, I may be talking out my ass here, but let's just go with that assumption. That ain't right. If you describe getting along with others, and having spirited conversation from time to time as sucking up...then you need to redefine the phrase.

Then, I saw the thread about the 5 greatest Chiefs of all time, and had to nearly break my fingers not to respond. She jumped into the middle of a conversation between one man who picked Eric Hicks and another man who was giving him legitimate, educated shit about it. It was blatant, defensive, and I thought a little odd. Then she immediately pulled the female card. Boo hoo. These guys were only challenging her to back up her picks. Instead of defending her picks, she started boohooing about being a woman and liking football. Whatever.

Now, I for one, don't post a lot about the football stuff. I don't keep up with all the stats, but when I find something I want to voice my opinion on, I will. But, I recognize my limitations. Doesn't mean I love football any less than the best statistician here...just means I don't have all the stats memorized. It's more of a game of emotion for me...and yes...I'm gonna dare say it...feminists be damned...it's prolly cause I am a...eek...female.

In other words, if you are gonna bring your "game" to the board...be ready to back it up. I really think that's all the dudes were getting at in the first place. Ain't nothing wrong with that...it's a football board afterall.

Finally, if I am going to be transparent and completely honest, I have to also say, that it does seem like there are times that she gets piled on for no real obvious reason. I don't for a second, think it's because she's a chick, but rather because of her track record with the annoyance factor.

I'm against banning her. But if you are reading this C4Me, seriously, try lightening up a bit. I'm not patronizing you...or putting you down, but everything doesn't have to be about you being mistreated.

Excellent post and I hope she and others listen and make an attempt.

Saulbadguy 07-11-2005 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 4th and Long
I figure the board has an iggy function for a reason. If she really irritates you that much and you're not smart enough to use that functions, then shut your cake hole and suffer the consequences.

FWIW, I think its larger than that. I could put her on ignore if I wanted, but I truly do get a kick out of her getting pissed. Even if say..75% of the people that she irritates ignore her, there will still be the pile ons, and still be the wrecking of threads.

Logical 07-11-2005 08:26 PM

By the way thanks everyone for helping me move up a notch on Skips quality BB participant meter I see we have passed 100. OK now on to 500.

Mush, mush I tell you (sharp whistle and cracking of whip)

Mr. Kotter 07-11-2005 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 4th and Long
I figure the board has an iggy function for a reason. If she really irritates you that much and you're not smart enough to use that functions, then shut your cake hole and suffer the consequences.

Exactly, my thoughts. FTR, I don't find her as annoying as several other board members...unfortunately for her, those other board members have "earned their stripes" so-to-speak....or are a part of the "cool" board cliques, so they don't get piled on like she does.

Chiefs Pantalones 07-11-2005 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JennyGump
Ok. I have for the most part, remained quiet when it came to C4Me. But here is my honest and open take...

At first, she got on my nerves, but I had no good reason for it, or at least I couldn't articulate it. Hell, I get on a lot of nerves too...so what? I could live with it.

Then I started observing how she would jump in the middle of a thread and make it about her. Now...I'm all about narcissism...I mean, look at me, but I try to be a little self-depricating about it. Still...no big deal. Fun times.

Then, it seemed she started playing the "female" card more and more. I didn't read the threads closely, so I didn't and still don't feel too educated enough to draw a conclusion regarding fairness. However, recently, she made some comments about other female posters being suck ups. I have to assume, since there are like a whole 8-10 of us vaginal types, she was lumping me in there. Like Mer, I may be talking out my ass here, but let's just go with that assumption. That ain't right. If you describe getting along with others, and having spirited conversation from time to time as sucking up...then you need to redefine the phrase.

Then, I saw the thread about the 5 greatest Chiefs of all time, and had to nearly break my fingers not to respond. She jumped into the middle of a conversation between one man who picked Eric Hicks and another man who was giving him legitimate, educated shit about it. It was blatant, defensive, and I thought a little odd. Then she immediately pulled the female card. Boo hoo. These guys were only challenging her to back up her picks. Instead of defending her picks, she started boohooing about being a woman and liking football. Whatever.

Now, I for one, don't post a lot about the football stuff. I don't keep up with all the stats, but when I find something I want to voice my opinion on, I will. But, I recognize my limitations. Doesn't mean I love football any less than the best statistician here...just means I don't have all the stats memorized. It's more of a game of emotion for me...and yes...I'm gonna dare say it...feminists be damned...it's prolly cause I am a...eek...female.

In other words, if you are gonna bring your "game" to the board...be ready to back it up. I really think that's all the dudes were getting at in the first place. Ain't nothing wrong with that...it's a football board afterall.

Finally, if I am going to be transparent and completely honest, I have to also say, that it does seem like there are times that she gets piled on for no real obvious reason. I don't for a second, think it's because she's a chick, but rather because of her track record with the annoyance factor.

I'm against banning her. But if you are reading this C4Me, seriously, try lightening up a bit. I'm not patronizing you...or putting you down, but everything doesn't have to be about you being mistreated.

Great post.

You had me at vaginal.

Hammock Parties 07-11-2005 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vlad Logicslav
;) wondering how gochiefs ever came up with this idea.ROFL

GoChiefs: Did you ever hear the tragedy of Darth Meatpeeker "the unwise"?

Royr17: No.

GoChiefs: I thought not. It's not a story the mods would tell you. It's a troll legend. Darth Meatpeeker was a Dark Lord of the Trolls, so lame and so arrogant he could use the message boards to influence the mods to create bans ... He had such a knowledge of the troll side that he could even keep the posting styles he cared about from dying.

Royr17: He could actually avoid IP bans?

GoChiefs: The dark side of internet message boards is a pathway to many abilities some consider to be unnatural.

Royr17: What happened to him?

GoChiefs: He became so powerful . . . the only thing he was afraid of was losing his trollish behavior, which eventually, of course, he did. Unfortunately, he taught his apprentice everything he knew, then his apprentice killed him in his sleep. (smiles) Meatpeeker never saw it coming. It's ironic he could save others from IP bans, but not himself.

Royr17: Is it possible to learn this power?

GoChiefs: Not from a mod.

Iowanian 07-11-2005 08:28 PM

now, she's going to call "some lady who sucks up to the men on the board and flirts with secksual connotations an "asskisser"

Skip Towne 07-11-2005 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia
What we really need to do is find a sub-forum in which she is most interested. It worked before.

It sure has. That was the best improvement this board has ever seen. Now, that guy is like a relative we dislike and only see occaisonally on holidays. Who is JQ?

|Zach| 07-11-2005 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skip Towne
Who is JQ?

Jesus Qhrist.

4th and Long 07-11-2005 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saulbadguy
FWIW, I think its larger than that. I could put her on ignore if I wanted, but I truly do get a kick out of her getting pissed. Even if say..75% of the people that she irritates ignore her, there will still be the pile ons, and still be the wrecking of threads.

Disagree partially.

If you "get a kick out of her" then she obviously provides a level of entertainment for you on the baord. No need for you to put her on iggy.

However, those that still pile on are not so irritated at her that they will put her on iggy, on the contrary, they enjoy giving her a load of shit, thus contributing nothing to the board, which is exactly what they are accusing her of.

Pot, meet kettle.

Chiefs Pantalones 07-11-2005 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gochiefs
GoChiefs: Did you ever hear the tragedy of Darth Meatpeeker "the unwise"?

Royr17: No.

GoChiefs: I thought not. It's not a story the mods would tell you. It's a troll legend. Darth Meatpeeker was a Dark Lord of the Trolls, so lame and so arrogant he could use the message boards to influence the mods to create bans ... He had such a knowledge of the troll side that he could even keep the posting styles he cared about from dying.

Royr17: He could actually avoid IP bans?

GoChiefs: The dark side of internet message boards is a pathway to many abilities some consider to be unnatural.

Royr17: What happened to him?

GoChiefs: He became so powerful . . . the only thing he was afraid of was losing his trollish behavior, which eventually, of course, he did. Unfortunately, he taught his apprentice everything he knew, then his apprentice killed him in his sleep. (smiles) Meatpeeker never saw it coming. It's ironic he could save others from IP bans, but not himself.

Royr17: Is it possible to learn this power?

GoChiefs: Not from a mod.

ROFL

You were the chosen one!!!

ChiTown 07-11-2005 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Kotter
Exactly, my thoughts. FTR, I don't find her as annoying as several other board members...unfortunately for her, those other board members have "earned their stripes" so-to-speak....or are a part of the "cool" board cliques, so they don't get piled on like she does.

I made a post to her about 2 weeks ago. It was a friendly post asking her to lighten up and stop being a victim all the time. I told her that it would make her time here much more enjoyable, and mine as well. She fired back a basic FU, and who was I to tell her what to do.

Fine, the gloves came off at that point. She doesn't want to be civil and take a little friendly advice, she goes on my shite list. In short, if she wants to post here, so be it. She has every right to make a fn idiot outta herself whenever/wherever she wants. She just shouldn't expect that to go unnoticed.

Chieficus 07-11-2005 08:33 PM

I'm going to put myself in the "she's made her bed now she has to lay in it" category... but... that is based upon the idea that this is just another example of some things being taken way too seriously...

I come here because I want to--I like to read, occasionally post, get into an argument every now and then (mainly in the political forum), etc. If I want to try to be insightful, I'll try to be insightful; if I want to express a bit of my nerdy, dry humor, heck, I'm going to do that too.

At the end of the day there is little impact this place has on the various aspects of my life (aside from satisfying a need for news in terms of my football fanhood). I shut the computer off, think: "Okay, I had some fun with some people of at least one similar interest," go to bed and dream about whatever it is Chieficus' dream about.

If you get too emotionally tied up in this to the point where you can't get over someone you've probably never met (nor never will) taking jabs at you, well, that's your own problem...

Logical 07-11-2005 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gochiefs
GoChiefs: Did you ever hear the tragedy of Darth Meatpeeker "the unwise"?

Royr17: No.

GoChiefs: I thought not. It's not a story the mods would tell you. It's a troll legend. Darth Meatpeeker was a Dark Lord of the Trolls, so lame and so arrogant he could use the message boards to influence the mods to create bans ... He had such a knowledge of the troll side that he could even keep the posting styles he cared about from dying.

Royr17: He could actually avoid IP bans?

GoChiefs: The dark side of internet message boards is a pathway to many abilities some consider to be unnatural.

Royr17: What happened to him?

GoChiefs: He became so powerful . . . the only thing he was afraid of was losing his trollish behavior, which eventually, of course, he did. Unfortunately, he taught his apprentice everything he knew, then his apprentice killed him in his sleep. (smiles) Meatpeeker never saw it coming. It's ironic he could save others from IP bans, but not himself.

Royr17: Is it possible to learn this power?

GoChiefs: Not from a mod.

ROFL wow funny. But actually, do you remember when Phil did put you on a BB wide iggy (not a ban). It worked as I recall for an entire weekend before your figured it out.

HemiEd 07-11-2005 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 4th and Long
I figure the board has an iggy function for a reason. If she really irritates you that much and you're not smart enough to use that functions, then shut your cake hole and suffer the consequences.


Quote:

Originally Posted by 4th and Long
Disagree partially.

If you "get a kick out of her" then she obviously provides a level of entertainment for you on the baord. No need for you to put her on iggy.

However, those that still pile on are not so irritated at her that they will put her on iggy, on the contrary, they enjoy giving her a load of shit, thus contributing nothing to the board, which is exactly what they are accusing her of.

Pot, meet kettle.

two of the better posts I have read so far on the Planet.

Logical 07-11-2005 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skip Towne
It sure has. That was the best improvement this board has ever seen. Now, that guy is like a relative we dislike and only see occaisonally on holidays. Who is JQ?

I don't know if JQ was his initials or not, I cannot remember any more. Hawaiianboy used that as his username from 1995 until either just before or just after he moved to ChiefsPlanet.

Chiefs Pantalones 07-11-2005 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chieficus
I'm going to put myself in the "she's made her bed now she has to lay in it" category... but... that is based upon the idea that this is just another example of some things being taken way too seriously...

I come here because I want to--I like to read, occasionally post, get into an argument every now and then (mainly in the political forum), etc. If I want to try to be insightful, I'll try to be insightful; if I want to express a bit of my nerdy, dry humor, heck, I'm going to do that too.

At the end of the day there is little impact this place has on the various aspects of my life (aside from satisfying a need for news in terms of my football fanhood). I shut the computer off, think: "Okay, I had some fun with some people of at least one similar interest," go to bed and dream about whatever it is Chieficus' dream about.

If you get too emotionally tied up in this to the point where you can't get over someone you've probably never met (nor never will) taking jabs at you, well, that's your own problem...

:clap:

Mr. Kotter 07-11-2005 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiTown
I made a post to her about 2 weeks ago. It was a friendly post asking her to lighten up and stop being a victim all the time. I told her that it would make her time here much more enjoyable, and mine as well. She fired back a basic FU, and who was I to tell her what to do.

Fine, the gloves came off at that point. She doesn't want to be civil and take a little friendly advice, she goes on my shite list. In short, if she wants to post here, so be it. She has every right to make a fn idiot outta herself whenever/wherever she wants. She just shouldn't expect that to go unnoticed.

That isn't cool, of her. I know...been there, done that... :redface:

There have been several board members who've gone through rocky periods (no pun intended, heh...) on the board, but moved on. Hopefully this will have a happy ending.

|Zach| 07-11-2005 08:37 PM

I guess my response to the "just ignore her" crowd is how there really can be multiple threads that are nothing but bickering between her and whoever it could be. Weather it is her fault her someone else's it still leaves a whole board that is annoying and disrupted. Whole conversations change and run around in circles. If someone really believes she is that much a disruption to the board and it would be a better place if she left or changed then the ignore feature will not change that.

|Zach| 07-11-2005 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Kotter
That isn't cool, of her. I know...been there, done that... :redface:

There have been several board members who've gone through rocky periods (no pun intended, heh...) on the board, but moved on. Hopefully this will have a happy ending.

Indeed.

Dr. Johnny Fever 07-11-2005 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vlad Logicslav
Could we all agree to try and give her one fresh start?

Hell I never had a problem with her. I think she's a nice person and I think it's cool that she doesn't just crawl under a rock with all the shit she's given.

Personally I find all of this kind of bullshit between members quite tiring and immature. Who the **** cares if you don't like someone and someone doesn't like you. It's the ****in internet. What a waste of time to constantly bash someone over the head because you don't like their internet personality or their posting style. Get a life if that's all you have.

Hey if I can make nice with BD and Iowa... everyone should be able to get along.

:D

Hammock Parties 07-11-2005 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Special Ed
ROFL

You were the chosen one!!!

GoChiefs: You have allowed this trollish behavior to twist your mind until now . . . until now you have become the very thing you swore to destroy.

Meatpeeker: Don't lecture me, GoChiefs. I see through the lies of the mods. I do not fear the troll side as you do. I have brought peace, justice, freedom, and security to my new message board.

GoChiefs: Your new message board?

Meatpeeker: Don't make me ban you.

GoChiefs: Meatpeeker, my allegiance is to Chiefsplanet ... to dumbassery!

Meatpeeker: If you're not with me, I'm going to flame you.

GoChiefs: Only a Troll Lord deals in absolutes. I will do what I must.

(ignites his neg repsaber)

Meatpeeker: You will try.

Meatpeeker ignites his repsaber.


-THEY FIGHT-

GoChiefs: I have failed you, Meatpeeker. I was never able to teach you to think before you posted.

Meatpeeker: I should have known the mods were plotting to take over . . .

GoChiefs: From the trolls!!! Meatpeeker, JD Prez is evil!

Meatpeeker: From the mods point of view! From my point of view, the mods are evil.

GoChiefs: Well, then you are lost!

Meatpeeker: This is the end for you, My Master. I wish it were otherwise.

GoChiefs: It's over, Meatpeeker. I have the high ground.

Meatpeeker: You underestimate my power!

GoChiefs: Don't try it.

MEATPEEKER follows, and GoChiefs cuts his young apprentice at the post count, then cuts off his posting style in the blink of an eye.

GoChiefs:You were the Chosen One! It was said that you would, destroy the trolls, not join them! It was you who would bring balance to the message board, not leave it in darkness!

Meatpeeker: I hate you!

Dr. Johnny Fever 07-11-2005 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saulbadguy
No problem. I guarantee she will not change her ways, though.

Why do you care? Do you want to marry her or something?

4th and Long 07-11-2005 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZachKC
I guess my response to the "just ignore her" crowd is how there really can be multiple threads that are nothing but bickering between her and whoever it could be. Weather it is her fault her someone else's it still leaves a whole board that is annoying and disrupted. Whole conversations change and run around in circles. If someone really believes she is that much a disruption to the board and it would be a better place if she left or changed then the ignore feature will not change that.

Are we still talking about chiefs4me or did this turn into a Skip Towne thread too? They are interchangeable in the above scenario as of late.

4th and Long 07-11-2005 08:42 PM

BTW, it seems to me that gochiefs is wrecking this thread all on his own. Lets ban him too cuz he's doing exactly what you are accusing c4m of right now.

ChiTown 07-11-2005 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beer me
Hell I never had a problem with her. I think she's a nice person and I think it's cool that she doesn't just crawl under a rock with all the shit she's given.

Personally I find all of this kind of bullshit between members quite tiring and immature. Who the **** cares if you don't like someone and someone doesn't like you. It's the ****in internet. What a waste of time to constantly bash someone over the head because you don't like their internet personality or their posting style. Get a life if that's all you have.

Hey if I can make nice with BD and Iowa... everyone should be able to get along.

:D

The internet is aaaaaaaaaall I have left. They done took mah car, mah house and mah dog. I'm jus sittin here in the outhouse shitter with my computer and a wireless card..............

Chiefs Pantalones 07-11-2005 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gochiefs
GoChiefs: You have allowed this trollish behavior to twist your mind until now . . . until now you have become the very thing you swore to destroy.

Meatpeeker: Don't lecture me, GoChiefs. I see through the lies of the mods. I do not fear the troll side as you do. I have brought peace, justice, freedom, and security to my new message board.

GoChiefs: Your new message board?

Meatpeeker: Don't make me ban you.

GoChiefs: Meatpeeker, my allegiance is to Chiefsplanet ... to dumbassery!

Meatpeeker: If you're not with me, I'm going to flame you.

GoChiefs: Only a Troll Lord deals in absolutes. I will do what I must.

(ignites his neg repsaber)

Meatpeeker: You will try.

Meatpeeker ignites his repsaber.


-THEY FIGHT-

GoChiefs: I have failed you, Meatpeeker. I was never able to teach you to think before you posted.

Meatpeeker: I should have known the mods were plotting to take over . . .

GoChiefs: From the trolls!!! Meatpeeker, JD Prez is evil!

Meatpeeker: From the mods point of view! From my point of view, the mods are evil.

GoChiefs: Well, then you are lost!

Meatpeeker: This is the end for you, My Master. I wish it were otherwise.

GoChiefs: It's over, Meatpeeker. I have the high ground.

Meatpeeker: You underestimate my power!

GoChiefs: Don't try it.

MEATPEEKER follows, and GoChiefs cuts his young apprentice at the post count, then cuts off his posting style in the blink of an eye.

GoChiefs:You were the Chosen One! It was said that you would, destroy the trolls, not join them! It was you who would bring balance to the message board, not leave it in darkness!

Meatpeeker: I hate you!

ROFL ROFL ROFL nice

Chiefs Pantalones 07-11-2005 08:47 PM

Chiefsplanet Ban Em'! reality show on NBC this Sunday!...

Who Will They Ban Next?

Iowanian 07-11-2005 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beer me
Hey if I can make nice with BD and Iowa... everyone should be able to get along.

:D


Hold the Soap on a rope there Sparticus. I agreed for the betterment of the board to stop bickerin with you. It doesn't mean I don't think some of your posts aren't still douchee, or that we're scheduling any warm showers together at the next game.



I've tried the "just ignore her posts" option...and it hasn't worked too well for me so far. If it'll help stop the piling, I'll put her on ignore, until someone of merrit contacts me and tells me she's straitened up.

Dr. Johnny Fever 07-11-2005 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiTown
The internet is aaaaaaaaaall I have left. They done took mah car, mah house and mah dog. I'm jus sittin here in the outhouse shitter with my computer and a wireless card..............

you need a pot to piss in?

Mr. Kotter 07-11-2005 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 4th and Long
Are we still talking about chiefs4me or did this turn into a Skip Towne thread too? They are interchangeable in the above scenario as of late.

Fuggin', hey....damn straight. ROFL

REP

Dr. Johnny Fever 07-11-2005 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Iowanian
Hold the Soap on a rope there Sparticus. I agreed for the betterment of the board to stop bickerin with you. It doesn't mean I don't think some of your posts aren't still douchee, or that we're scheduling any warm showers together at the next game.

Funny how you took "make nice" into something gay.

DJay23 07-11-2005 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Iowanian
Hold the Soap on a rope there Sparticus. I agreed for the betterment of the board to stop bickerin with you. It doesn't mean I don't think some of your posts aren't still douchee, or that we're scheduling any warm showers together at the next game.

heh, douchee

Hammock Parties 07-11-2005 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Special Ed
Chiefsplanet Ban Em'! reality show on NBC this Sunday!...

Who Will They Ban Next?

Chiefs4Me, you're the next contestant on YOUR ASS IS BANNED! Come on DOWN!

Mr. Kotter 07-11-2005 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiTown
The internet is aaaaaaaaaall I have left. They done took mah car, mah house and mah dog. I'm jus sittin here in the outhouse shitter with my computer and a wireless card..............

Michael Jackson, is that you? :hmmm:

You were found "not guilty," so you are a free man now...

Coach 07-11-2005 08:51 PM

ROFL at some of the posts.

I think this one could go to the Hall of Classics.

Mr. Kotter 07-11-2005 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beer me
Funny how you took "make nice" into something gay.

Iowanton?

DJay23 07-11-2005 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Kotter
Michael Jackson, man ...

These terms are oxymorons.

stevieray 07-11-2005 08:53 PM

ha.. a thread about getting along with smack flying.

ROFL

Mr. Kotter 07-11-2005 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach
ROFL at some of the posts.

I think this one could go to the Hall of Classics.

gochief's posts alone warrant that...heh.

Jenny Gump 07-11-2005 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia
FWIW, I'm all for this effort. The smear the queer game with her is growing tiresome.

I didn't know she was queer. Is she hot?

ChiTown 07-11-2005 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevieray
ha.. a thread about getting along with smack flying.

ROFL

Ain't the intranet a wunerfull thang? I really wish I could shake Algore's hand right now..........

Dr. Johnny Fever 07-11-2005 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevieray
ha.. a thread about getting along with smack flying.

ROFL

imagine that....on Chiefs Planet even!

ROFL

Logical 07-11-2005 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZachKC
I guess my response to the "just ignore her" crowd is how there really can be multiple threads that are nothing but bickering between her and whoever it could be. Weather it is her fault her someone else's it still leaves a whole board that is annoying and disrupted. Whole conversations change and run around in circles. If someone really believes she is that much a disruption to the board and it would be a better place if she left or changed then the ignore feature will not change that.

True and besides iggy does not keep a person from seeing her posts when she is being quoted.

4th and Long 07-11-2005 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vlad Logicslav
True and besides iggy does not keep a person from seeing her posts when she is being quoted.

Anyone with the smallest modicum of self restraint wouldn't bother replying to a quote.

|Zach| 07-11-2005 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 4th and Long
Anyone with the smallest modicum of self restraint wouldn't bother replying to a quote.

That seems to not be true...

Chiefs Pantalones 07-11-2005 08:59 PM

Well, now that a majority of the BB has spoken, we should ban her it looks like.

Sorry chiefs4me...no boobs, no glory.

4th and Long 07-11-2005 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZachKC
That seems to not be true...

No, it's true. The people with no self restraint would reply to her quotes. People with self restraint, by definition, would use that self restraint and not reply.

Jenny Gump 07-11-2005 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Iowanian
now, she's going to call "some lady who sucks up to the men on the board and flirts with secksual connotations an "asskisser"

Well..yeah...anyone who does that must be a stupid whore..........

.....wait a minute....

Hammock Parties 07-11-2005 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Kotter
gochief's posts alone warrant that...heh.

UNLIIIIIIIIIMITED POOOOOOOWER!!!!!!!!

ChiTown 07-11-2005 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ENDelt260
If a person had self-restraint they wouldn't need ignore.

:clap:

I've never used that ignore function. I'm pretty sure it's b/c I'm not smart enough to figure out how it works. I figure, given another 5 years on this bb, and I'll figure it out.......

Iowanian 07-11-2005 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JennyGump
Well..yeah...anyone who does that must be a stupid whore..........

.....wait a minute....


I don't think you're stupid.






but I Do think you're a 300lb guy, probably named Larry.

Chiefs Pantalones 07-11-2005 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ENDelt260
If a person had self-restraint they wouldn't need ignore.

Looks like this poster is the only one to spell "self-restraint" correctly, so in that case, he wins the argument. Congratulations.

Jenny Gump 07-11-2005 09:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Iowanian
Hold the Soap on a rope there Sparticus. I agreed for the betterment of the board to stop bickerin with you. It doesn't mean I don't think some of your posts aren't still douchee, or that we're scheduling any warm showers together at the next game.

I don't care who you are...that's funny. P.S. I am not sucking up

Chiefs Pantalones 07-11-2005 09:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Iowanian
I don't think you're stupid.






but I Do think you're a 300lb guy, probably named Larry.

ROFL

-Why don't you post a pic?

--Oh I'm just soooooo dense, and I just got this computer...hehehe hugs and kisses!!!

Logical 07-11-2005 09:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 4th and Long
BTW, it seems to me that gochiefs is wrecking this thread all on his own. Lets ban him too cuz he's doing exactly what you are accusing c4m of right now.

I am accusing C4me of that? Where did I do that? Heh sometimes I forget so you can remind me.

Skip Towne 07-11-2005 09:10 PM

I've needled her since she first got here but don't dislike her like a lot of these guys. Until last night when she got really disigerant. Then I let her have it. I've gotten several hours of entertainment watching Iowanian carve her up. She is comedy gold. But as for all her crap, she can stay but that shit has to go.

Jenny Gump 07-11-2005 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 4th and Long
Anyone with the smallest modicum of self restraint wouldn't bother replying to a quote.

Are these restraints made of fur, or leather?

Iowanian 07-11-2005 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Special Ed
ROFL

-Why don't you post a pic?

--Oh I'm just soooooo dense, and I just got this computer...hehehe hugs and kisses!!!

"well, I'd like to post the pic series of me getting my brazillian wax from Pam Anderson, but their on my other computer, and its out of blinker fluid...tee hee

Oh no...there must be a breeze because the Nipples that top my ample milky breasts have just stiffened to the size of a small midget's fists

I can talk foosball pitchers if I want to, too"

Dr. Johnny Fever 07-11-2005 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JennyGump
Are these restraints made of fur, or leather?

You post naked don't you....


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:17 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.