ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Glazer: KC called Cleveland regarding Quinn. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=192142)

Hootie 09-21-2008 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 5039606)
this is a good point

which is why, regardless of how much we like Sam Bradford more than Brady Quinn, Quinn makes the most sense for this franchise.

I don't think Quinn is going to be the next Peyton Manning, but I think he can be a winning QB.

We save SO much money with Quinn...we can do so many more things...and when we're ready to compete we'll have the ability to sign anyone for anything.

beach tribe 09-21-2008 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ILChief (Post 5039614)
Good. I'd love to have Quinn. If Cleveland doesn't want to deal, we should call Arizona about Leinart

Yeah, and offer them a 4th.

Hootie 09-21-2008 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArrowheadHawk (Post 5039616)
He does have three years of nfl experience. Lot of good that does him.

well you totally missed my point...go figure.

1ChiefsDan 09-21-2008 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArrowheadHawk (Post 5039586)
Unfortunately for us all we don't get to make this call. Carl will make this call so bet your ass it will be the wrong decision.

Regardless of what side of the discussion you are on - this is probably the best statement in this thread.

Hootie 09-21-2008 10:55 AM

I think this is a moot point, though.

I see Quinn as the starter in Cleveland sooner rather than later.

We can give a 3rd for Derek Anderson!!

ArrowheadHawk 09-21-2008 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie (Post 5039626)
well you totally missed my point...go figure.

How do you know that Quin wouldn't perform like Smith? You don't your betting a first round pick on a player that is not good enough to start on his own team.

DT58HOF 09-21-2008 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 5039584)
i'd trade for Quinn ..... BUT NOT our 1st rounder


you don't trade the 1st pick of the draft for Brady Quinn :eek:

why not if Brady Quinn would of come out after the 2005 season he would of been the number 1 pick, and if we trade for him now, we wont have a high pick anyways because we will win some football games, he is a proven winner and at a cheap Salary as well, READ MY LIPS
THERE IS NO QB IN THE DRAFT ANYWHERE CLOSE TO BRADY QUINN (FUTURE HALL OF FAMER)

beach tribe 09-21-2008 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie (Post 5039629)
I think this is a moot point, though.

I see Quinn as the starter in Cleveland sooner rather than later.

We can give a 3rd for Derek Anderson!!

Like i said, Anderson will be our Brees.

beach tribe 09-21-2008 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArrowheadHawk (Post 5039630)
How do you know that Quin wouldn't perform like Smith? You don't your betting a first round pick on a player that is not good enough to start on his own team.

Brady would have gotten his shot, had anderson not come in, and light it up.

You just cant bench a guy playing like that.

ClevelandBronco 09-21-2008 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcxiv (Post 5039577)
Dont be a tard. No one thought sippio was Rice. People just wanted him to succeed becuase he was a good story. Chapter closed though.

There is no point in having a first rounder sit back up while you can get something decent for him. ANderson is young, its not like Rodgers in Green Bay.

Don't be a tard. It's obviously a joke, as was Sippio!.

Hootie 09-21-2008 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArrowheadHawk (Post 5039630)
How do you know that Quin wouldn't perform like Smith? You don't your betting a first round pick on a player that is not good enough to start on his own team.

My point was...

Rivers and Rodgers didn't sniff the field.

Smith was thrown right into the fire on a horrible team and it ruined his career.

Do I know Quinn will be great? Absolutely not. He could be WORSE than Smith. He could be the worst QB of all time.

But for this franchise, giving up a 1st for Quinn makes nothing but sense.

MIAdragon 09-21-2008 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie (Post 5039602)
You must have missed the Browns game the other week when they kicked a field goal in the fourth to keep it a three score game.


LoL what a Herm call that was.

ClevelandBronco 09-21-2008 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shag (Post 5039603)
He does have more NFL experience than any QB KC would draft...

Hmm. Maybe that makes him worth more than your top five pick.

RealSNR 09-21-2008 11:03 AM

What if we swap 1st rounders with Cleveland and give them a 2nd rounder for Quinn?

RNR 09-21-2008 11:03 AM

What has he done to make some of you guys willing to give what will most likely be a top 5 or higher pick+ for him? I am not trying to flame I just am wondering. I understand the cap part as I don't even want to know what Oakland paid per yard last week for all 57 yards they got from their high dollar QB. Quinn was passed over by teams needing a QB he has done nothing but get beat out and seems to be nothing more than a "name". NFL GMs seemed to be rather unimpreesed with him and he has done nothing to prove them wrong IMO. As far as the cap slot issue KC could trade out of that pick picking up players and draft picks.

dj56dt58 09-21-2008 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcxiv (Post 5039521)
I like Quinn, but i wouldnt give a first rounder. Not when the Chiefs can potentially pick number 1 in the draft. A 2 and a 5 maybe.

I dont get it..Quinn already has some experience and would prbably be good righ away ala Aaron Rodgers..You'd rather have draft a rookie who hasnt taken a snap in the NFL who we would end up paying more money for? Quinn in college was better than Stafford is imo

The Bad Guy 09-21-2008 11:46 AM

I love some of you that would be so generous to part with a 2nd and a 5 for Quinn.

You are probably the same tards that think Brodie is the true answer.

DT58HOF 09-21-2008 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 5040065)
I love some of you that would be so generous to part with a 2nd and a 5 for Quinn.

You are probably the same tards that think Brodie is the true answer.

wtf? a 2nd and a 5th? we cant get a good player in the first round let alone the 5th, so what does it matter?
i say trade the whole draft for quinn, we can't draft good players anyway!

aturnis 09-21-2008 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DT58HOF (Post 5040107)
wtf? a 2nd and a 5th? we cant get a good player in the first round let alone the 5th, so what does it matter?
i say trade the whole draft for quinn, we can't draft good players anyway!

Are you serious? Or just special?

aturnis 09-21-2008 12:36 PM

Anyone consider trading a pick away for Brian Brohm? It doesn't look like they'll need him, Rodgers is playing great.

evolve27 09-21-2008 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aturnis (Post 5040623)
Anyone consider trading a pick away for Brian Brohm?

Every Sunday I think about it.

dj56dt58 09-21-2008 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArrowheadHawk (Post 5039630)
How do you know that Quin wouldn't perform like Smith? You don't your betting a first round pick on a player that is not good enough to start on his own team.

Rodgers wasn't good enough to start, neither was Brady..most quarterbacks dont start right away

Shag 09-21-2008 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aturnis (Post 5040623)
Anyone consider trading a pick away for Brian Brohm? It doesn't look like they'll need him, Rodgers is playing great.

I've wondered myself why this hasn't come up. Granted, he looked terrible in the preseason and is sitting 3rd on their depth chart, but I would think it should at least garner some consideration...

keg in kc 09-21-2008 12:39 PM

Not sure how I'd feel about it. I really, really didn't like Quinn coming out and I thought the Browns did us a favor. But I'd rather acquire a young QB that's been groomed for a couple of years than draft one in '09. I'd like to see us winning games sometime before 2011.

Smed1065 09-21-2008 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie (Post 5039483)
I'd give our #1 overall for Quinn...

No doubt in my mind. I like him better than Stafford, and we won't have to pay him Tom Brady money.

Logistically speaking, it makes PERFECT sense. He'll have learned the ropes for two years, and he's being paid as a late 1st round pick, rather than an elite QB (like we'd have to pay if we took one #1 overall)...

I'd give our 1st and 4th without flinching.

???

CosmicPal 09-21-2008 12:43 PM

You have to figure what must be going through Peterson's mind right now.

Only 2 things can happen here:

1. He makes the trade for Quinn, and Brady turns out to be a stud, franchise-saving QB, AND more importantly, saves Peterson his job in the final year of his contract.

or...

2. He makes the trade for Quinn, and Brady turns out to be a flop, thus setting the franchise back a few more years, and costs Peterson his job in his final year of his contract.

Frankie 09-21-2008 12:50 PM

QUINN= OVER-HYPED NOTRE DAME QB!

If the chiefs give the Browns a 1st for him (or even a high 2nd) I'll go postal. And I'm a peaceful man.

Brock 09-21-2008 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie (Post 5040735)
QUINN= OVER-HYPED NOTRE DAME QB!

If the chiefs give the Browns a 1st for him (or even a high 2nd) I'll go postal. And I'm a peaceful man.

But then, you're noted for thinking Brodie Croyle can play.

JuicesFlowing 09-21-2008 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CosmicPal (Post 5040678)
You have to figure what must be going through Peterson's mind right now.

Only 2 things can happen here:

1. He makes the trade for Quinn, and Brady turns out to be a stud, franchise-saving QB, AND more importantly, saves Peterson his job in the final year of his contract.

or...

2. He makes the trade for Quinn, and Brady turns out to be a flop, thus setting the franchise back a few more years, and costs Peterson his job in his final year of his contract.


His job is already in question, so what's to lose?

ClevelandBronco 09-21-2008 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 5039662)
What if we swap 1st rounders with Cleveland and give them a 2nd rounder for Quinn?

Trade firsts and give Cleveland Colquitt.

Chiefshrink 09-21-2008 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cosmos (Post 5039525)
With Dick Curl on board, there is no hope for the future.

precisely:shake:

PastorMikH 09-21-2008 01:30 PM

oops, wrong thread

BigVE 09-21-2008 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ClevelandBronco (Post 5040900)
Trade firsts and give Cleveland Colquitt.

NOW we are talking CRAZY TALK! Colquitt is our MVP!!!

Chiefshrink 09-21-2008 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedNeckRaider (Post 5039665)
What has he done to make some of you guys willing to give what will most likely be a top 5 or higher pick+ for him? I am not trying to flame I just am wondering. I understand the cap part as I don't even want to know what Oakland paid per yard last week for all 57 yards they got from their high dollar QB. Quinn was passed over by teams needing a QB he has done nothing but get beat out and seems to be nothing more than a "name". NFL GMs seemed to be rather unimpreesed with him and he has done nothing to prove them wrong IMO. As far as the cap slot issue KC could trade out of that pick picking up players and draft picks.

Now here is some common sense thinking.:thumb:

And let me add some more, I don't give a rat's ass if you have Brady,Manning,McNabb or Ryan back there QBing if you don't have the horses in front of you, every QB you have will end up on their ass and throwing INTS PERIOD.:grr:

Our trenches on both sides of the ball are NOT solidified!!:cuss: Do not trade away picks for an unproven and especially if you can't protect him.:grr:

I agree, trade out of the No1 spot if we can and acquire more picks!!:thumb:

Chiefshrink 09-21-2008 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigVE (Post 5041071)
NOW we are talking CRAZY TALK! Colquitt is our MVP!!!

You are kidding, right????? He is the only defense we have right now. And not to mention potential Pro Bowler this year.:thumb:

The Bad Guy 09-21-2008 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie (Post 5040735)
QUINN= OVER-HYPED NOTRE DAME QB!

If the chiefs give the Browns a 1st for him (or even a high 2nd) I'll go postal. And I'm a peaceful man.

No offense, but your ability to indentify talent on this board is severely lacking.

If you think it's a bad idea, it probably isn't.

aturnis 09-21-2008 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dj56dt58 (Post 5040634)
Rodgers wasn't good enough to start, neither was Brady..most quarterbacks dont start right away

Who says Rodgers wasn't good enough to start? It would be reerunED to start him over Favre. Hell, it was reeruned to trade Favre away this year.

aturnis 09-21-2008 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 5041382)
No offense, but your ability to indentify talent on this board is severely lacking.

If you think it's a bad idea, it probably isn't.

That's what you ALWAYS say!


Might be true.

Pitt Gorilla 09-21-2008 02:21 PM

I would not give our first rounder for him. A third, yes. A second, I don't know.

The Bad Guy 09-21-2008 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 5041468)
I would not give our first rounder for him. A third, yes. A second, I don't know.

That's a good idea for the Browns.

Trade away a #1 to get him.

Ship him out for a 3rd 2 years later.

Frankie 09-21-2008 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 5040776)
But then, you're noted for thinking Brodie Croyle can play.

"Thinking" does not mean being absolutely sure. If you don't know the diff, here's your chance to learn something. All I have insisted on was we should go ahead and give him this year to prove himself. That said, I still "think" he can play. His issue is durability. Not talent. And let's see if he will last out the year after he comes back.

Frankie 09-21-2008 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 5041382)
No offense, but your ability to indentify talent on this board is severely lacking.

If you think it's a bad idea, it probably isn't.

Examples, please.

DomerNKC 09-21-2008 02:27 PM

A second rounder perhaps, nothing else. Second of all, giving these idiots more picks is stupid. The last successful player they drafted they traded to minnesota. The answer is to clean house before more damage is done.

ClevelandBronco 09-21-2008 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 5041483)
That's a good idea for the Browns.

Trade away a #1 to get him.

Ship him out for a 3rd 2 years later.

Exactly. The Browns will do no such thing.

Think bigger, guys.

The Bad Guy 09-21-2008 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie (Post 5041505)
Examples, please.

Brodie Croyle.

I don't care enough to dig through the archives to show more.

Mecca 09-21-2008 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 5041549)
Brodie Croyle.

I don't care enough to dig through the archives to show more.

If we wanted to develop a mid round QB it looks like that exception is Trent Edwards....

Rausch 09-21-2008 02:38 PM

I've changed my mind.

Save those picks for the next HC/GM to build a team.

They've had their 3 years, next...

Frankie 09-21-2008 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 5041549)
Brodie Croyle.

I don't care enough to dig through the archives to show more.

Take away the injuries and Croyle and Quinn, basically have the same resume talent-wise. The difference is Quinn played for the "mighty" Notre Dame and got all the hype.

Hootie 09-21-2008 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ClevelandBronco (Post 5040900)
Trade firsts and give Cleveland Colquitt.

our best player?

Hootie 09-21-2008 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie (Post 5041569)
Take away the injuries and Croyle and Quinn, basically have the same resume talent-wise. The difference is Quinn played for the "mighty" Notre Dame and got all the hype.

I don't think the scouts look at that Chief.

ClevelandBronco 09-21-2008 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie (Post 5041582)
our best player?

Arguably your only player.

DT58HOF 09-21-2008 02:44 PM

what????????
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 5040776)
I Like Young Boys,You're just mad your not young enough.

wow?

FringeNC 09-21-2008 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie (Post 5041569)
Take away the injuries and Croyle and Quinn, basically have the same resume talent-wise. The difference is Quinn played for the "mighty" Notre Dame and got all the hype.

Give me a break. I'm not ready to completely give up on Croyle, but Quinn was battle-tested week in and week out. Quinn made Charlie Weis look like a genius. What have they done since Quinn left?

Sure-Oz 09-21-2008 02:47 PM

Anderson has a TD pass so far, go cleveland, make Quinn expendable

Frankie 09-21-2008 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FringeNC (Post 5041618)
Give me a break. I'm not ready to completely give up on Croyle, but Quinn was battle-tested week in and week out. Quinn made Charlie Weis look like a genius. What have they done since Quinn left?

What had they done WHILE he was there?

oaklandhater 09-21-2008 02:54 PM

If we traded away our 1st pick for a QB who almost fell to the 2nd round just to save some $$$ this is the shit that is killing the chiefs we allways try to do shit different then other NFL teams.

we need to draft the best QB on board this April bite the bullet pay him his money and hope he works out if he doesn't cry me a river build a bridge and get over it thats the way the NFL WORKS...

Micjones 09-21-2008 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie (Post 5039483)
I'd give our #1 overall for Quinn...

No doubt in my mind. I like him better than Stafford, and we won't have to pay him Tom Brady money.

Logistically speaking, it makes PERFECT sense. He'll have learned the ropes for two years, and he's being paid as a late 1st round pick, rather than an elite QB (like we'd have to pay if we took one #1 overall)...

I'd give our 1st and 4th without flinching.

I'd flinch at giving them a Top 5 pick AND a Fourth, but I'd definitely let that #1 fly.

I feel a lot better knowing that they at least called to inquire about Quinn.

Lord please help us get this done...

Pitt Gorilla 09-21-2008 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 5041483)
That's a good idea for the Browns.

Trade away a #1 to get him.

Ship him out for a 3rd 2 years later.

I honestly don't care about the Browns' perspective. No way would I ship a top pick for him.

Micjones 09-21-2008 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater (Post 5041676)
If we traded away our 1st pick for a QB who almost fell to the 2nd round just to save some $$$ this is the shit that is killing the chiefs we allways try to do shit different then other NFL teams.

There were another 10 picks after Quinn was taken.
He was in no danger of falling out of the First Round.
The Chiefs would've taken him if Cleveland had not.

Additionally after the initial 10 picks were off the board there really weren't many teams that needed to make such an investment on a QB.

I would absolutely trade away that #1.
That would save us a bunch of jack and we'd be getting a QB who has been a part of an NFL program for 2 years. As opposed to a complete unknown with no NFL experience.

ClevelandBronco 09-21-2008 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 5041692)
There were another 10 picks after Quinn was taken.
He was in no danger of falling out of the First Round.
The Chiefs would've taken him if Cleveland had not.

Additionally after the initial 10 picks were off the board there really weren't many teams that needed to make such an investment on a QB.

I would absolutely trade away that #1.
That would save us a bunch of jack and we'd be getting a QB who has been a part of an NFL program for 2 years. As opposed to a complete unknown with no NFL experience.

That's it.

Chiefaholic 09-21-2008 03:02 PM

Let the season play out to see where everybody lands draft position wise. If/when we take the #1 spot, trade down, acquire more picks, THEN pull the trigger on a Quinn trade. We have too many damn holes to fill to trade away the #1 overall for a single player.

oaklandhater 09-21-2008 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 5041692)
There were another 10 picks after Quinn was taken.
He was in no danger of falling out of the First Round.
The Chiefs would've taken him if Cleveland had not.

Additionally after the initial 10 picks were off the board there really weren't many teams that needed to make such an investment on a QB.

I would absolutely trade away that #1.
That would save us a bunch of jack and we'd be getting a QB who has been a part of an NFL program for 2 years. As opposed to a complete unknown with no NFL experience.

Chances are we will be TRADEING away the number one pick in the NFL what are you afraid of it?

He has been siting behind derek anderson he is geting paid shit money becuase he has less potential then any QB we take with the 1st round pick thats just the way the NFL works.

oaklandhater 09-21-2008 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefaholic (Post 5041715)
Let the season play out to see where everybody lands draft position wise. If/when we take the #1 spot, trade down, acquire more picks, THEN pull the trigger on a Quinn trade. We have too many damn holes to fill to trade away the #1 overall for a single player.

WE need to take the best QB on the board at 1 its time this organisation takes a shot a getting a franchise QB we so desperately need.

Gravedigger 09-21-2008 03:13 PM

With Quarterbacks you could get the best or the worst. You see all these quarterbacks that we had the chance to get that are now just plowing ahead and everyone taking the success while we're stuck with our pick. Todd Blacklidge falls into this category, I say that we should do it because we're not going anywhere anytime soon.

TrickyNicky 09-21-2008 03:15 PM

Quinn comes in and gets us to 7-9 in 3 years.

Carl: Perrrrrrrfect.

oaklandhater 09-21-2008 03:15 PM

every other team is going to think we are BATshit insane if we give up the 1 pick in the nfl for a a mid-low 1st round qb who has done nothing in the NFL...

oaklandhater 09-21-2008 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrickyNicky (Post 5041777)
Quinn comes in and gets us to 7-9 in 3 years.

Carl: Perrrrrrrfect.

Better yet Quinn comes in and is less then avg it will go down has the most Boneheaded TRADE IN THE HISTORY OF THE NFL

Frankie 09-21-2008 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ClevelandBronco (Post 5041702)
That's it.

Wow. A Cleveland fan encouraging this frenzy.

TrickyNicky 09-21-2008 03:22 PM

I'm more afraid that if Carl trades for Quinn, he would keep his job.

blueballs 09-21-2008 03:23 PM

browns don't trade Quinn for draft picks
until they know he can't help them change the picking order
trade him now and just **** themselves out of a higher pick

FringeNC 09-21-2008 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater (Post 5041781)
every other team is going to think we are BATshit insane ...

Teams already think that -- Herm is our ****ing coach.

The Bad Guy 09-21-2008 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie (Post 5041806)
Wow. A Cleveland fan encouraging this frenzy.

He's a Bronco fan, genius.

Frankie 09-21-2008 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefaholic (Post 5041715)
Let the season play out to see where everybody lands draft position wise. If/when we take the #1 spot, trade down, acquire more picks, THEN pull the trigger on a Quinn trade. We have too many damn holes to fill to trade away the #1 overall for a single player.

WTF? RREASON?... In this frenzy of unreasonable lust for an unproven, over-hyped QB? I'm amazed.

Tribal Warfare 09-21-2008 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrickyNicky (Post 5041807)
I'm more afraid that if Carl trades for Quinn, he would keep his job.

BINGO!

oaklandhater 09-21-2008 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrickyNicky (Post 5041807)
I'm more afraid that if Carl trades for Quinn, he would keep his job.

you should be more afraid of the trade the 1st pick in the Draft for a benchwarmer the chiefs all rdy have too many worst we dont need worst trade in the history of the nfl to add to our resume.

MichaelH 09-21-2008 03:25 PM

I can't read 10 pages. They probably would laugh at the fact that Peterdick would offer a 7th rounder for him.

Sure-Oz 09-21-2008 03:25 PM

IF i were a cleveland fan i'd want a top 5 pick in return for Quinn easy

blueballs 09-21-2008 03:26 PM

Chiefs today pick #1 over all
with Quinn it could fall as far as 5th or 6th

oaklandhater 09-21-2008 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 5041826)
IF i were a cleveland fan i'd want a top 5 pick in return for Quinn easy

WTF they should feel lucky if they get what they gave for him which is a low 1st round pick our 2nd + a 4th or 5th would be borderline overpaying for a benchwarmer.

Frankie 09-21-2008 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 5041815)
He's a Bronco fan, genius.

I know that. But I'm sure he is a Cleveland fan as well being a resident there. My bad though. I stand corrected.

Wow. A Bronco fan encouraging this frenzy over a bad idea for the Chiefs. Who'da thunk that?

The point stands. Now maybe you get it.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.