ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Do You Suffer from TFS? True Fan Syndrome? If So, We Can Help (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=198633)

DaneMcCloud 12-17-2008 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FringeNC (Post 5306374)
You take Elway with Dan Reeves instead of Shanahan, and I'll take Martz with Warner, and see who wins.

You lose.

Furthermore, Kurt Warner is a great QB for one reason and one reason only:

Kurt Warner.

The guy played Arena League, World League and sat on the bench in St. Louis before playing. No one "developed" him but himself.

To think otherwise is naive.

FringeNC 12-17-2008 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5306385)
You lose.

ROFL

Reerun_KC 12-17-2008 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HemiEd (Post 5306384)
Why? I am no Herm Edwards fan and he will only look up to mediocrity, as long as he is the coach. His only shot was 9-7 with DV's team, game over.

I know ED, I was just ****ing with you.... Besides it sounded funny, I think I just might of given the Herm Supporters something to do for the evening...

DaneMcCloud 12-17-2008 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FringeNC (Post 5306388)
ROFL

Elway went to five Super Bowls, winning two.

Warner went to two Super Bowls, winning one.

If you're trying to make the argument that Warner is a more talented and better QB than Elway, you lose.

Hands down.

HemiEd 12-17-2008 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 5306389)
I know ED, I was just ****ing with you.... Besides it sounded funny, I think I just might of given the Herm Supporters something to do for the evening...

Damn, they will be sorry tomorrow.

The Bad Guy 12-17-2008 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 5306272)
Oh, what the hell. Let's go ahead and draft Schuler in the first. Oh, I mean Mirer. I mean Klingler. I mean Harrington. No wait, I mean Carr. DOH! I meant Leaf! Or...

I will forever maintain that a high #1 pick on a QB is the riskiest pick there is. I have watched so many fail. If that's what we do, well, I'll cross my fingers and hope for the best, but I don't agree that it's the wisest plan of attack.

Afraid to fail.

There may be no cure for you.

The Bad Guy 12-17-2008 07:23 PM

I would have to agree that Kurt Warner is basically a self-made QB. The guy was left for dead after his time with the New York Giants, and he's turned into an MVP candidate in Arizona.

He just seriously might be the most incredible NFL story ever.

SAUTO 12-17-2008 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 5306405)
I would have to agree that Kurt Warner is basically a WIFE-made QB. The guy was left for dead after his time with the New York Giants, and he's turned into an MVP candidate in Arizona.

He just seriously might be the most incredible NFL story ever.

FYP

ChiefsCountry 12-17-2008 07:25 PM

It is kind of ironic that Warner had the best WR combo in St. Louis and then again in Arizona.

FringeNC 12-17-2008 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5306390)
Elway went to five Super Bowls, winning two.

Warner went to two Super Bowls, winning one.

If you're trying to make the argument that Warner is a more talented and better QB than Elway, you lose.

Hands down.

He went to three with Dan Reeves as his HC when the AFC was a joke, and got blown out three times. He went with Shanahan, running a sophisticated offense, and won twice. Look at Elway's numbers pre- and post- Reeves. He's a completely different QB. Is Elway better than Warner -- yeah, but coaching and scheme MATTER, and the combination of Warner and Martz would blow away Elway and Reeves. Not even close.

HemiEd 12-17-2008 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 5306405)
I would have to agree that Kurt Warner is basically a self-made QB. The guy was left for dead after his time with the New York Giants, and he's turned into an MVP candidate in Arizona.

He just seriously might be the most incredible NFL story ever.

Do you think there is anything to the fact, that he may have had time to heal?
He got seriously beaten up during the end of his time in St. Louis, and almost seemed like a "dead man walking."
I wonder how many concussions he got in St. Louis?

I am not making light of the fact, he is an incredible story.

DeezNutz 12-17-2008 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 5306370)
Marino 'succeeded?' One rookie season SB loss [which per the Cowher rule doesn't count], and a career of playoff failure, culminating in the 50-0 playoff loss his final season.

Marino's the poster boy for RTFdom.

Yeah, he's a franchise QB. This doesn't mean that you're 100 percent assured a SB victory, but it greatly increases your odds that it will happen.

Was Elway any better at the very end of his career when he finally got the victory? Not hardly. He was great long before this, and not winning the SB wouldn't have changed this fact.

milkman 12-17-2008 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5306436)
Yeah, he's a franchise QB. This doesn't mean that you're 100 percent assured a SB victory, but it greatly increases your odds that it will happen.

Was Elway any better at the very end of his career when he finally got the victory? Not hardly. He was great long before this, and not winning the SB wouldn't have changed this fact.

What a franchise QB does is allow you to have a chance to compete at a SB caliber level consistenly for a number of years, provided that you put the pieces in place elswhere.

Game managers of the world might have that one season where they overachieve, or the team around them plays historically good (like the Ravens defense).

But teams like that can not sustain excellence consistently through years.

DeezNutz 12-17-2008 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5306455)
What a franchise QB does is allow you to have a chance to compete at a SB caliber level consistenly for a number of years, provided that you put the pieces in place elswhere.

Game managers of the world might have that one season where they overachieve, or the team around them plays historically good (like the Ravens defense).

But teams like that can not sustain excellence consistently through years.

I agree with this completely.

A good question would be, can you (the Planet at large) name a franchise QB who never reached the SB? Don't have to win it. Just get there.

Adept Havelock 12-17-2008 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5306485)
I agree with this completely.

A good question would be, can you (the Planet at large) name a franchise QB who never reached the SB? Don't have to win it. Just get there.

Archie Manning.

DeezNutz 12-17-2008 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adept Havelock (Post 5306488)
Archie Manning.

Hmmm...is this a franchise guy? Only two pro-bowl years, terrible TD-INT ratio, but played for the 'Aints. Tough call.

This is before my time, so I defer to the Skips on the board. :)

Adept Havelock 12-17-2008 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5306504)
Hmmm...is this a franchise guy? Only two pro-bowl years, terrible TD-INT ratio, but played for the 'Aints. Tough call.

This is before my time, so I defer to the Skips on the board. :)

IMO, he fits the definition of a Franchise QB. He just never had anything around him. :shrug:

DeezNutz 12-17-2008 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adept Havelock (Post 5306508)
IMO, he fits the definition of a Franchise QB. He just never had anything around him. :shrug:

Then let's add him to the list. Others?

Adept Havelock 12-17-2008 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5306516)
Then let's add him to the list. Others?

Carson Palmer. :p

the Talking Can 12-17-2008 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5305797)
Do you lie awake at nights dreaming of 8-8, or 9-7?

Do you judge a season as a success by a Wild Card birth?

Do you believe that defenses and running games are more important than franchise QBs?

Do you hate wide receivers?

Do you love coaches with a complete inability to spot talent at the running back position?

Do you think that 3-13 is better for the long term future of the franchise than 2-14?

Do you think the 2002 Bucs and 2000 Ravens are model NFL teams to aspire to?

Do you find playoff records to be irrelevant?

Do you believe that guards and right tackles should be taken with top five picks?

Do you believe that a quarterback is best served as a game manager?

Do you believe that every 3rd Down play should either be a screen or a draw?

Do you believe kicker is the most important position on the offense?

Do you believe that all of the best prospects reside in the Big XII?

Do you believe in trading down in any situation during the draft?

Do you believe that a team is better served picking 20 rather than 5 because they don't have to pay the player as much?


If so, you may suffer from TFS, True Fan Syndrome. Here at the ChiefsPlanet Clinic, our staff of experts can help rid you of this debilitating malady. Through study of game tape of such contests as Super Bowl XXIII we can help ameliorate the effects of play not to lose football.

Upon registering at our world-renowned clinic, you will be given the following ID badge:

http://i167.photobucket.com/albums/u...rabies/tfs.gif

After six weeks of therapy, our cure rate for TFS approaches 91%, which ironically, is slightly better than Herm Edwards' losing percentage the last 23 games.

If you or a loved one suffers from TFS, please, contact us immediately.

We're here to help.

Sincerely,

The ChiefsPlanet Clinic

total awesomeness

:clap:

Do you judge QBOTF by their box scores?

Do you think that risk is scary, and therefore, wish to draft last in every round to avoid the perception of failure?

Do you think that Marty and Bill Cowher are the only two coaches left on the planet?

Do you think that Gunther was once a great coordinator?

Do you think that reaction is safer than action?

Do you think every other team that actually drafted a QBOTF just 'got lucky' and that it could never happen to us?

Is your name [alias of claythan and hootie]?

Do you prefer tailgating to Championships?

Do you fear the unknown?

Do you believe that 'being close in the 4th quarter' is the objective of an offense?

Do you believe that the run sets up the pass?

Do you believe that Stafford "has done nothing worth mentioning" in college?

Do you think QBs don't need to know how to play from under the center, and that learning 5 and 7 step drops is irrelevant because once Thigpen completed a 7 yard pass to a hall of fame tight end in quadruple coverage?

Do you think Dane is cool?

Well, then you, my reeruned friend, you are a True Fan.

ChiefsCountry 12-17-2008 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5306485)
I agree with this completely.

A good question would be, can you (the Planet at large) name a franchise QB who never reached the SB? Don't have to win it. Just get there.

Warren Moon
Carson Palmer

DeezNutz 12-17-2008 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adept Havelock (Post 5306525)
Carson Palmer. :p

Well, **** me. I write in allegory. Don't be a literal reader.

Reerun_KC 12-17-2008 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 5306533)
total awesomeness

:clap:

Do you judge QBOTF by their box scores?

Do you think that risk is scary, and therefore, wish to draft last in every round to avoid the perception of failure?

Do you think that Marty and Bill Cowher are the only two coaches left on the planet?

Do you think that Gunther was once a great coordinator?

Do you think that reaction is safer than action?

Do you think every other team that actually drafted a QBOTF just 'got lucky' and that it could never happen to us?

Is your name [alias of claythan and hootie]?

Do you prefer tailgating to Championships?

Do you fear the unknown?

Do you believe that 'being close in the 4th quarter' is the objective of an offense?

Do you believe that the run sets up the pass?

Do you believe that Stafford "has done nothing worth mentioning" in college?

Do you think QBs don't need to know how to play from under the center, and that learning 5 and 7 step drops is irrelevant because once Thigpen completed a 7 yard pass to a hall of fame tight end in quadruple coverage?

Do you think Dane is cool?

Well, then you, my reeruned friend, you are a True Fan.

Holy crap TTC!

That was perfect!

DeezNutz 12-17-2008 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 5306540)
Warren Moon
Carson Palmer

Let's give Palmer and all current players a bit more time, please. It's not over for Palmer, yet.

Moon is a good example.

ChiefsCountry 12-17-2008 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5306544)
Let's give Palmer and all current players a bit more time, please. It's not over for Palmer, yet.

Moon is a good example.

Moon is the only Super Bowl era quarterback to be in the Hall that never made the big game.

the Talking Can 12-17-2008 08:23 PM

this thread scores 1000

DeezNutz 12-17-2008 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 5306548)
Moon is the only Super Bowl era quarterback to be in the Hall that never made the big game.

Ok. Then this list comes to a close.

One. Only one franchise-level QB has never made the big dance. This is a good bar. I would say that all franchise-level QB's are likely HOF worthy.

ChiefsCountry 12-17-2008 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5306553)
Ok. Then this list comes to a close.

One. Only one franchise-level QB has never made the big dance. This is a good bar. I would say that all franchise-level QB's are likely HOF worthy.

Actually forgot Dan Fouts. Make that two.

DeezNutz 12-17-2008 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 5306560)
Actually forgot Dan Fouts. Make that two.

Neg. rep. your way. :D

Two. ****ing two. If this doesn't highlight the importance of trying to find a QB of this caliber, I don't know what does.

FringeNC 12-17-2008 08:36 PM

Do you believe that 'being close in the 4th quarter' is the objective of an offense?

When Herm makes that comment -- followed by "and that's all you can hope for, really" -- I just want to scream. How can anyone agree with that nonsense?

ChiefsCountry 12-17-2008 08:37 PM

Here is the Hall of Fame Quarterback List

Winners
Bart Starr (2)
Joe Namath
Len Dawson
Johnny Unitas
Roger Stabuach (2)
Bob Griese (2)
Terry Bradshaw (4)
Joe Montana (4)
Troy Aikman (3)
Steve Young
John Elway (2)

Losers in the Super Bowl
Sonny Jurgensen
Fran Tarkenton
Dan Marino
Jim Kelly

Didn’t Make It
Dan Fouts
Warren Moon

Pre-Super Bowl Era
*George Blanda (kicker in the Super Bowl)
Otto Graham
Bobby Layne
YA Tittle
Norm Van Brocklin
Bob Waterfield

OnTheWarpath15 12-17-2008 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5306485)
I agree with this completely.

A good question would be, can you (the Planet at large) name a franchise QB who never reached the SB? Don't have to win it. Just get there.

How are you guys evaluating who's a franchise QB, and who's not?

Based on the simple fact they were drafted as high as they were, you'd have to say any QB drafted in the top 5-10 would be a franchise QB, correct?

OnTheWarpath15 12-17-2008 08:47 PM

Hamas-

You need to add this in some form:


Do you believe that the only way to be a winning team is to throw money at the most expensive Free Agents every year, regardless of need?

'Hamas' Jenkins 12-17-2008 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 5306282)
Do you thank spending decades wading through franchise QB contracts spent on, JaMarcus Russell, Vince Young, Matt Leinart, Cutler, Alex Smith, Carson Palmer, Byron Leftwich, David Carr, Joey Harrington, Michael Vick, Chad Pennington, Tim Couch, Akili Smith, Daunte Culpepper and Ryan Leaf is worth the chance to get the Manning brothers.

There are teams that found themselves on premier WRs and QBs, it's the Lions, Cardinals, and the Vikes of the 90s.

Oh look, it's Marty's #1 fan, the man who said Bob Sanders was more valuable to the Colts than Peyton Manning.

By all means, let's take his draft-by-fear based approach and hope that we hit on a 9th round QB from Western Mennonite Tech.

You also left out Terry Bradshaw, Troy Aikman, John Elway, forgot that Cutler and Palmer are actually good, Ben Roethlisberger, Dan Marino, Jim Kelly, among others.

Oh, and by the way, Captain TF, those great Marty teams, both pre and post-Chief who was he continually losing to in the playoffs?

Elway X3
Kelly X2
Marino X2

Clearly, we're much better off just getting a role player and spending a top 10 pick on a right tackle or strong safety, eh?

Reerun_KC 12-17-2008 09:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FringeNC (Post 5306570)
Do you believe that 'being close in the 4th quarter' is the objective of an offense?

When Herm makes that comment -- followed by "and that's all you can hope for, really" -- I just want to scream. How can anyone agree with that nonsense?

But the supporters will argue that the team is void of talent, then boast about the talent that we have....

98% of the supporters arguments contradict themselves...

Its sad but its fact...

'Hamas' Jenkins 12-17-2008 09:42 PM

They don't get any "true fanner" than this shit:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee
Jags are what I've long aspired for the Chiefs to be, only I'd want a D as good as the '00 Ravens to boot.
Funny they have all the hallmarks of what Marty tried to instill, right down to a mini-RBBC that is far from a laughingstock, solid low-profile QB who doesn't make mistakes, disciplined line play, etc.


The Bad Guy 12-17-2008 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FringeNC (Post 5306570)
Do you believe that 'being close in the 4th quarter' is the objective of an offense?

When Herm makes that comment -- followed by "and that's all you can hope for, really" -- I just want to scream. How can anyone agree with that nonsense?

A ****ing men.

You know what I want a coach to say? The objective is to blow them the hell out for 3 quarters so we can get the bench guys in for mop up duty.

It's a ****ing loser attitude. It's like being the last one cut from the baseball team. Well at least you were "close" to making it.

You dumb Herm asslickers want a leader that just wants to be "close" in the fourth quarter. When teams are close to Herm Edwards in the 4th quarter, Herm goes into a shell. He can keep pointing to those single-digit losses. All that tells me is that he can't close the deal.

Mecca 12-17-2008 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5306691)
They don't get any "true fanner" than this shit:

The Jags committed to their game manager QB and now they blow...that philosophy of building a team isn't even consistent anymore.

DeezNutz 12-17-2008 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5306577)
How are you guys evaluating who's a franchise QB, and who's not?

Based on the simple fact they were drafted as high as they were, you'd have to say any QB drafted in the top 5-10 would be a franchise QB, correct?

That's a tough question to give a straight, simple answer to. The best way I can put it is: indisputable, superior talent.

Warren Moon is a great example. No one with half a brain would question that he was a great, great player. Contrast him with Green. Here's a player who went to a Pro-Bowl, had some very nice seasons, but was very much a system guy. I'm not knocking system guys; you can win with them, but I'm looking for a higher tier.

In short, this is subjective. Good banter for bars or message boards.

DeezNutz 12-17-2008 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 5306702)
A ****ing men.

You know what I want a coach to say? The objective is to blow them the hell out for 3 quarters so we can get the bench guys in for mop up duty.

It's a ****ing loser attitude. It's like being the last one cut from the baseball team. Well at least you were "close" to making it.

You dumb Herm asslickers want a leader that just wants to be "close" in the fourth quarter. When teams are close to Herm Edwards in the 4th quarter, Herm goes into a shell. He can keep pointing to those single-digit losses. All that tells me is that he can't close the deal.

"Well, I was close to landing the pussy..."

"So, you're saying you're still a virgin?"

"Yeah, but all you can really ask for is to be close..."

"Um...unless you want your dick wet..."

OnTheWarpath15 12-17-2008 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5306746)
That's a tough question to give a straight, simple answer to. The best way I can put it is: indisputable, superior talent.

Warren Moon is a great example. No one with half a brain would question that he was a great, great player. Contrast him with Green. Here's a player who went to a Pro-Bowl, had some very nice seasons, but was very much a system guy. I'm not knocking system guys; you can win with them, but I'm looking for a higher tier.

In short, this is subjective. Good banter for bars or message boards.

So you're evaluating "franchise" QB's AFTER they've played, not before.

If so, that's gonna skew the data a bit, don't you think?

If we knew who was going to be a franchise QB BEFORE they ever played a down, I doubt you'd be getting much argument from people...

Mecca 12-17-2008 10:08 PM

The team has always been run very conservative, I think that's where alot of this come from. No 1st round QB's, resign your own players that had produced before even if it wasn't a good idea, you breed something for so long people just get use to it and then it's the norm.

It was to the point that saying LJ should be moved before he re-signed caused basically everyone but a few people to say we should keep him.

'Hamas' Jenkins 12-17-2008 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5306750)
So you're evaluating "franchise" QB's AFTER they've played, not before.

If so, that's gonna skew the data a bit, don't you think?

If we knew who was going to be a franchise QB BEFORE they ever played a down, I doubt you'd be getting much argument from people...

A franchise QB is a guy who can lead 4th quarter comebacks in the most dire of situations, when everyone on the D knows he is going to pass, when the D pins its ears back, when the defense is playing uber tight coverage, and he wills them down the field.

Brady did it twice in the Super Bowl. Montana did it. Eli Manning did it. Elway did it. Hell, Jim Kelly did it in a Super Bowl.

It doesn't just have to be a Super Bowl, either. Manning has done it in the playoffs more than once, Steve Young did it against the Packers.

I've never seen a running game lead a 4th quarter comeback in a 2 minute drill.

DeezNutz 12-17-2008 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5306750)
So you're evaluating "franchise" QB's AFTER they've played, not before.

If so, that's gonna skew the data a bit, don't you think?

If we knew who was going to be a franchise QB BEFORE they ever played a down, I doubt you'd be getting much argument from people...

Naw, not an evaluation, just an exercise to underscore the importance of the trying to acquire one. A response, if you will, to the True Fan's mandate.

I was thinking about the fans who are afraid of taking a risk to find one, when darn near every single one has led his team to the SB.

Even the current crop tends to suggest this. Roethlisberger, Manning. I wouldn't bet against Cutler. If season one is any indication, I'd put a ton of money on Ryan...

DaneMcCloud 12-17-2008 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FringeNC (Post 5306413)
He went to three with Dan Reeves as his HC when the AFC was a joke, and got blown out three times. He went with Shanahan, running a sophisticated offense, and won twice. Look at Elway's numbers pre- and post- Reeves. He's a completely different QB. Is Elway better than Warner -- yeah, but coaching and scheme MATTER, and the combination of Warner and Martz would blow away Elway and Reeves. Not even close.

You're smoking crack.

And that "combination" was beat in the Super Bowl by Tom Brady.

FAIL.

OnTheWarpath15 12-17-2008 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5306764)
A franchise QB is a guy who can lead 4th quarter comebacks in the most dire of situations, when everyone on the D knows he is going to pass, when the D pins its ears back, when the defense is playing uber tight coverage, and he wills them down the field.

Brady did it twice in the Super Bowl. Montana did it. Eli Manning did it. Elway did it. Hell, Jim Kelly did it in a Super Bowl.

It doesn't just have to be a Super Bowl, either. Manning has done it in the playoffs more than once, Steve Young did it against the Packers.

I've never seen a running game lead a 4th quarter comeback in a 2 minute drill.

You're missing the point. And for the record, I'm on your side on this.

The talk is about drafting a QB, and the question was name a franchise QB that didn't make the SB.

Then these guys go on to list QB's that were determined to be franchise guys AFTER they had played, not before.

You don't have that luxury on draft day of knowing who's going to be a franchise guy - you just hope like hell he is because you've just made a huge investment in him.

It's kinda cheating to say that only Fouts and A. Manning were the only two "franchise" QB's to not make the SB.

I'm pretty sure guys like Carr, Ware, Leaf, etc were considered franchise QB's when they were picked...

the Talking Can 12-17-2008 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5306761)
The team has always been run very conservative, I think that's where alot of this come from. No 1st round QB's, resign your own players that had produced before even if it wasn't a good idea, you breed something for so long people just get use to it and then it's the norm.

It was to the point that saying LJ should be moved before he re-signed caused basically everyone but a few people to say we should keep him.

after 15 years of abject failure, people still think that the only problem was 'execution'....they believe the philosophy behind our actions was sound...

this is what you can't make true fans see: it wasn't a matter of execution, our plan was flawed from its inception...the assumptions about how to build a team WERE WRONG AND THEY HAVE TO CHANGE

you either get it or you don't....and most kc fans don't get it, and never will

'Hamas' Jenkins 12-17-2008 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5306777)
You're missing the point. And for the record, I'm on your side on this.

The talk is about drafting a QB, and the question was name a franchise QB that didn't make the SB.

Then these guys go on to list QB's that were determined to be franchise guys AFTER they had played, not before.

You don't have that luxury on draft day of knowing who's going to be a franchise guy - you just hope like hell he is because you've just made a huge investment in him.

It's kinda cheating to say that only Fouts and A. Manning were the only two "franchise" QB's to not make the SB.

I'm pretty sure guys like Carr, Ware, Leaf, etc were considered franchise QB's when they were picked...

I get the point, but every player is drafted early to be a "Dominant blind side rusher", a "franchise left tackle", a "shut down corner" an "every down back" or a "#1 receiver".

Every position carries a label with it in the draft.

Basically, the True Fan has eschewed the idea of a franchise QB, the most important position, because they are afraid of the risk of one not working out, as though there aren't Robert Gallerys, Tony Mandariches, Blair Thomases, Charles Rogerses, Ryan Simses, Aundray Bruces, DeAngelo Halls,Michael Huffs and David LaFluers at every position.

OnTheWarpath15 12-17-2008 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5306768)
I was thinking about the fans who are afraid of taking a risk to find one, when darn near every single one has led his team to the SB.

That's my point.

You can't cheat and only use guys that were considered franchise guys after the fact.

I'm pretty sure Houston considered David Carr a franchise QB, or they wouldn't have picked him 1st overall.

You're also using guys that were picked in later rounds, and this place is notorious for saying you can't get a franchise QB outside the Top 15.

Again, I agree with you guys, but I think you're going about it the wrong way.

Mecca 12-17-2008 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 5306781)
after 15 years of abject failure, people still think that the only problem was 'execution'....they believe the philosophy behind our actions was sound...

this is what you can't make true fans see: it wasn't a matter of execution, our plan was flawed from its inception...the assumptions about how to build a team WERE WRONG AND THEY HAVE TO CHANGE

you either get it or you don't....and most kc fans don't get it, and never will

It didn't help that some of the best players we had played devalued positions so then those positions got overvalued. I don't care how good Gonzalez is you don't build your team around or make your highest paid player your tight end.

TE's, RG's, RB's all devalued positions not to mention the reerun fullback obsession.

OnTheWarpath15 12-17-2008 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5306786)
I get the point, but every player is drafted early to be a "Dominant blind side rusher", a "franchise left tackle", a "shut down corner" an "every down back" or a "#1 receiver".

Every position carries a label with it in the draft.

Basically, the True Fan has eschewed the idea of a franchise QB, the most important position, because they are afraid of the risk of one not working out, as though there aren't Robert Gallerys, Tony Mandariches, Blair Thomases, Charles Rogerses, Ryan Simses, Aundray Bruces, DeAngelo Halls,Michael Huffs and David LaFluers at every position.

I'm with you 100%.

My point is that it's disingenuous to say that damn near every franchise QB has made the SB, when it's not even remotely close to being true.

the Talking Can 12-17-2008 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5306792)
It didn't help that some of the best players we had played devalued positions so then those positions got overvalued. I don't care how good Gonzalez is you don't build your team around or make your highest paid player your tight end.

TE's, RG's, RB's all devalued positions not to mention the reerun fullback obsession.

i love tony to death, but i agree...

OnTheWarpath15 12-17-2008 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5306792)
It didn't help that some of the best players we had played devalued positions so then those positions got overvalued. I don't care how good Gonzalez is you don't build your team around or make your highest paid player your tight end.

TE's, RG's, RB's all devalued positions not to mention the reerun fullback obsession.

Agree 100%

DeezNutz 12-17-2008 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5306777)
You're missing the point. And for the record, I'm on your side on this.

The talk is about drafting a QB, and the question was name a franchise QB that didn't make the SB.

Then these guys go on to list QB's that were determined to be franchise guys AFTER they had played, not before.

You don't have that luxury on draft day of knowing who's going to be a franchise guy - you just hope like hell he is because you've just made a huge investment in him.

It's kinda cheating to say that only Fouts and A. Manning were the only two "franchise" QB's to not make the SB.

I'm pretty sure guys like Carr, Ware, Leaf, etc were considered franchise QB's when they were picked...

Ok. I got you.

You're right that there have been all sorts of frauds, and there are going to be probably at least 2-3 imposters in the upcoming draft class. We'll have to sit through the bullshit spewed by Kiper, Jaws, and the rest, and many of these "franchise" guys will fail.

My only point is that the risk if worth it, and it's one that this franchise must take. For grins, let's say we are fortunate enough to draft a Stafford, and then let's say he sucks the penis for three straight years (or enough time for it to be clear that he's definitely not the guy, whatever amount that is). No development. No indication that he'll improve. I'm going to be the first to say, let's draft another QB. Let's keep firing.

True fan, b/c his mother clearly swallowed the fraction of the sperm containing his nut sack, is far too scared to try once, let alone to try, fail, and want to try again.

DeezNutz 12-17-2008 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5306793)
I'm with you 100%.

My point is that it's disingenuous to say that damn near every franchise QB has made the SB, when it's not even remotely close to being true.

Then those guys weren't franchise QBs. :p

It's semantics at this point. We're in agreement, I believe. Point is, take the ****ing risk and be willing to deal with the consequences.

OnTheWarpath15 12-17-2008 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5306807)
Ok. I got you.

You're right that there have been all sorts of frauds, and there are going to be probably at least 2-3 imposters in the upcoming draft class. We'll have to sit through the bullshit spewed by Kiper, Jaws, and the rest, and many of these "franchise" guys will fail.

My only point is that the risk if worth it, and it's one that this franchise must take. For grins, let's say we are fortunate to draft a Stafford, and then let's say he sucks the penis for three straight years. No development. No indication that he'll improve. I'm going to be the first to say, let's draft another QB. Let's keep firing.

True fan, b/c his mother clearly swallowed the fraction of the sperm containing his nut sack, is far too scared to try once, let alone to try, fail, and want to try again.

Agree 100%.

The question for some people is: Is Stafford worth that risk?

To some he is - to others, he isn't.

Where things get lost in translation is when the Stafford-ites try to claim you're not willing to take the risk just because you don't like their guy.

DeezNutz 12-17-2008 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5306816)
Agree 100%.

The question for some people is: Is Stafford worth that risk?

To some he is - to others, he isn't.

Where things get lost in translation is when the Stafford-ites try to claim you're not willing to take the risk just because you don't like their guy.

And there's the problem. And this is probably something that has happened with every single great QB in NFL history.

In Indy, there were probably a group of loud mouths screaming for Ryan Leaf. Probably about 50 percent of the fan base. It's the same thing here. About 75 percent of the board wants to slob Stafford, while the others dream of coddling Bradford's sack.

philfree 12-17-2008 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5306816)
Agree 100%.

The question for some people is: Is Stafford worth that risk?

To some he is - to others, he isn't.

Where things get lost in translation is when the Stafford-ites try to claim you're not willing to take the risk just because you don't like their guy.

Yes and with a few fans around here if you don't like their guy or plan then you get labled a "True Fan".

PhilFree:arrow:

milkman 12-17-2008 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5306787)
That's my point.

You can't cheat and only use guys that were considered franchise guys after the fact.

I'm pretty sure Houston considered David Carr a franchise QB, or they wouldn't have picked him 1st overall.

You're also using guys that were picked in later rounds, and this place is notorious for saying you can't get a franchise QB outside the Top 15.

Again, I agree with you guys, but I think you're going about it the wrong way.

Let's try to define "Franchise QB" in the draft.

He's guy with talent.
Reasonbly strong arm, reasonable accuracy, has shown an ability to make plays when there aren't any to be made, has a good head on his shoulders and a leader.

What you are actually trying to define is potential.

No one can look at a QB and say he's a franchise QB.

We can only say that he has the potential.

milkman 12-17-2008 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5306816)
Agree 100%.

The question for some people is: Is Stafford worth that risk?

To some he is - to others, he isn't.

Where things get lost in translation is when the Stafford-ites try to claim you're not willing to take the risk just because you don't like their guy.

Gotta say, it's really hard to take people who don't like "my" guy seriously when they come in here and tell us that Chase Daniel is a better prospect.

They are either unwilling to admit they are afraid to take the risk, or simply the dumbest mother****ers on the planet.

RedThat 12-17-2008 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5306194)
It would appear as though you have Stage II TFS. There is a 72% cure rate. You will be forced to watch tape of the 1994 49ers for three weeks as videotherapy.

I suggest that you get your things in order, for if you continue to say things like Dorsey is a bust, your TFS may be present in the frontal lobe, which would indicate euthanasia as the only course.

Your TFS Primary Care Counselor will be OnTheWarpath58.

ROFL you're such a dork but i'll give you some man love:grouphug:

just no medication ok? The videotherapy is fine i can handle that.

OnTheWarpath15 12-17-2008 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5306873)
Gotta say, it's really hard to take people who don't like "my" guy seriously when they come in here and tell us that Chase Daniel is a better prospect.

They are either unwilling to admit they are afraid to take the risk, or simply the dumbest mother****ers on the planet.

See, that's where I call BS.

There are two posters, who will remain nameless, (they know who they are, and honestly, so does everyone else) who attack anyone who doesn't like Stafford. Period.

I've said countless times that I'm not sold 100% on Stafford, but if Sanchez was to declare, I'd be all for it.

I was labeled a true fan, chickenshit, afraid to take risks.

It's bullshit, and you know it.

You know as well as I do this isn't exclusive to the guys who pimp Daniel...

ChiefsCountry 12-17-2008 10:55 PM

I got some pretty good data coming up on top 5 quarterbacks.

milkman 12-17-2008 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5306879)
See, that's where I call BS.

There are two posters, who will remain nameless, (they know who they are, and honestly, so does everyone else) who attack anyone who doesn't like Stafford. Period.

I've said countless times that I'm not sold 100% on Stafford, but if Sanchez was to declare, I'd be all for it.

I was labeled a true fan, chickenshit, afraid to take risks.

It's bullshit, and you know it.

You know as well as I do this isn't exclusive to the guys who pimp Daniel...

Oh, I know that there are some pretty good posters that don't agree with me, and I have been open minded in my debates in the Stafford v. Bradford debates..

But I do call out some idiots, like the one that actually started the thread that he stated Daniel is a better propspect and I just wanted to set the record straight.

DeezNutz 12-17-2008 11:01 PM

I'll say one thing about Stafford. He might be the ugliest mother****er in the draft. And this is the guy who is going to be "the face of the franchise"? He's going to cock block Chiefs fans all over the country, as well as reaffirm the Camaro persona.

ChiefsCountry 12-17-2008 11:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5306893)
I'll say one thing about Stafford. He might be the ugliest mother****er in the draft. And this is the guy who is going to be "the face of the franchise"? He's going to cock block Chiefs fans all over the country, as well as reaffirm the Camaro persona.

Elway wasnt a looker either.

DeezNutz 12-17-2008 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 5306899)
Elway wasnt a looker either.

No. Now there's a good debate.

bowener 12-17-2008 11:41 PM

I haven't been feeling good lately.

I fear I may have contracted something from my close contact to many of the planeteers.

Crush 12-17-2008 11:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bowener (Post 5306980)
I haven't been feeling good lately.

I fear I may have contracted something from my close contact to many of the planeteers.


What are your symptoms?

RedThat 12-18-2008 12:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bowener (Post 5306980)
I haven't been feeling good lately.

I fear I may have contracted something from my close contact to many of the planeteers.

Oh yeah?

I didnt know TFS syndrome was contagious?

Agent V 12-18-2008 12:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bowener (Post 5306980)
I haven't been feeling good lately.

I fear I may have contracted something from my close contact to many of the planeteers.

As long as you don't have a sudden urge to cradle Gunther or Marty's testicles, I'd say we have a good chance of obliterating it with some 90's playoff highlight film therapy. It's painful, but worth it.

Tribal Warfare 12-18-2008 12:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 5306899)
Elway wasnt a looker either.

or Bradshaw

'Hamas' Jenkins 12-18-2008 12:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5306816)
Agree 100%.

The question for some people is: Is Stafford worth that risk?

To some he is - to others, he isn't.

Where things get lost in translation is when the Stafford-ites try to claim you're not willing to take the risk just because you don't like their guy.

I don't know if it's lost in translation. I think it's pretty clear from the post of someone like Baby Lee that he's too afraid of the Ryan Leafs to potentially grab a John Elway, as he finds the '07 Jags to be a model franchise, despite the fact that they were promptly piss pounded out of the playoffs by a team that had a....franchise QB, and blew an 18 point lead to another team that had one.

Quarterback carries the most risk because it's the most valuable. Risk aversion only prohibits you from potentially securing the most valuable position on the team, and that is a losing proposition.

'Hamas' Jenkins 12-18-2008 12:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5306793)
I'm with you 100%.

My point is that it's disingenuous to say that damn near every franchise QB has made the SB, when it's not even remotely close to being true.

But a much higher % of teams have won SBs, and have been competitive year in, year out, with a franchise QB.

philfree 12-18-2008 12:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5306852)
Let's try to define "Franchise QB" in the draft.

He's guy with talent.
Reasonbly strong arm, reasonable accuracy, has shown an ability to make plays when there aren't any to be made, has a good head on his shoulders and a leader.

What you are actually trying to define is potential.

No one can look at a QB and say he's a franchise QB.

We can only say that he has the potential.

What makes a Franchise QB for that matter?

PhilFree:arrow:

RustShack 12-18-2008 02:06 AM

Give him the power!

Saulbadguy 12-18-2008 07:53 AM

We could not have success because we had Trent Green as our QB. Repeat that to yourself 5 times and tell yourself you are right.

Tiger's Fan 12-18-2008 08:43 AM

I'm not really into these childish games, but I'll play in this instance. What will the fanboys do if Stafford isn't there in the first? Shit yourselves? Want to take Bradford, or a POS like Sanchez? Will the draft be a failure if we don't take a QB in the first? I'm all for taking a first round QB, just not for the sake of taking one only because it's the first round. If ever there was a bust proof QB on the board, I just don't see that in a very inconsistent Stafford.

WilliamTheIrish 12-18-2008 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5305797)

Bar none, that is the greatest emoticon in the history of the internet. LMAO

WilliamTheIrish 12-18-2008 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArrowheadHawk (Post 5305820)
Do you enjoy watching your team lose?

If the answer is yes than you might be a reerun.

Like a moth to a flame....four posts in. Instead of True fan Syndrome, I'd diagnose you as Down's Fan Syndrome.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.