ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs To the drafturbators... (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=233408)

Saccopoo 09-14-2010 12:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 7003338)
6 more yards then your boy Cassel

you must be really proud

I'm not a Cassel fan, just to let you know. I'm really hoping we get a legit quarterback in the draft in the next 1-3 years. You know, when there are legit quarterbacks in the draft.

DaneMcCloud 09-14-2010 12:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 7003572)
Like I said who is counting. NFL.com is showing 389 total yards. I am not going to argue over 18 yards.

Thanks for the info! I wonder if they're incorrect or CBS?

Hootie 09-14-2010 12:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 7003569)
Posting a thread to say you're a better fan than someone else because you disagree about team building approaches is ****ing reeruned.

But then again Hootie is ****ing reeruned.

is someone sad because the chiefs won and they can't be a negative douche bag this week?!!??!

awwwwwwwwww

it'll be ok mommy will make your favorite din din tomorrow big guy!

notorious 09-14-2010 12:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 7003573)
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/gametra...20100913_SD@KC

This is the link where I got my stats.

Out of curiosity, where are you seeing less? Not trying to be a dick, I'd just like another source in the future if CBS is incorrect.

No Prob Dane. I got the stats off of ESPN.

BigMeatballDave 09-14-2010 12:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 7003381)
It was a good cut. Wasn't a "sick" cut. Pretty routine for someone expected to be a good returner.

JFC. ****ing debbie downer. :rolleyes:

ThaVirus 09-14-2010 12:08 AM

Keep in my mind that it was raining something fierce. That makes the cut a little more impressive..

Mecca 09-14-2010 12:08 AM

:facepalm:

SenselessChiefsFan 09-14-2010 12:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 7003559)
mecca and hamas aren't real fans

plain and simple

they aren't

Arenas/McCluster and Moeaki were great today...

especially the first two

we owned this 2010 draft...plain and simple...

it's our ****ing foundation

and even Dorsey/Jackson were impressive...

our linebackers looked good

we will be an average to above average defense...

with playmakers who can steal games like what we did today

Let's calm down just a little.

Through the first game, the Chiefs have a solid A in the draft. It is the first game. Do I think that the Chiefs rookies will suddenly implode? No.

That said, it takes more than one game to evaluate a good or bad draft pick. It take more than a season, really.

So far, I will agree, that the early returns are pretty good.

Mecca 09-14-2010 12:08 AM

The stats are different because player stats don't account for yards lost on sacks.

Basileus777 09-14-2010 12:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 7003573)
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/gametra...20100913_SD@KC

This is the link where I got my stats.

Out of curiosity, where are you seeing less? Not trying to be a dick, I'd just like another source in the future if CBS is incorrect.

I think the total yards is including yards lost via sacks.

rambleonthruthefog 09-14-2010 12:09 AM

the d would have given up a whole lot less if they weren't on the damn field the whole game. i'm pumped bout the win, but our QB and playcalling pretty much sucked from beginning to end.

Hootie 09-14-2010 12:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 7003584)
:facepalm:

does mecca need a belly rub and a warm glass of milk so he can go night-night??

it's ok I'm sure the chiefs will lose soon so you can have your fun/fun time on ChiefsPlanet with all your big boy friends!

Rudy tossed tigger's salad 09-14-2010 12:09 AM

Hootie has some balls.

Reaper16 09-14-2010 12:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bunit (Post 7003553)
I am saying that you seem to be knocking the mother****er in some pussy passive aggressive way because you didn't like the ****ing pick and are looking for some hope of vindication.

That be what I'm saying.

I be sayin' that I ain't knockin' the brotha', I just be sayin' that if you wanna' crown his ass then crown his ass. But it's week one and Dex be all goin' down on first contact and shit on offense and wasn't particularly impressive outside of a return that wasn't as amazing as ya'll cats is making it out to be. I hope he earn dat crown though.

Hootie 09-14-2010 12:10 AM

there were good playcalls...and horrible playcalls

I think the idea was...

"hey...bad weather...lets make them beat us rather than let Cassel beat us..."

which is a problem but it's a problem I don't want to think about right now =)

Reaper16 09-14-2010 12:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 7003583)
Keep in my mind that it was raining something fierce. That makes the cut a little more impressive..

That is a decent point, I admit.

Brock 09-14-2010 12:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 7003584)
:facepalm:

Life a little tough on you right now?

Mecca 09-14-2010 12:11 AM

Look what Reaper is saying is fine. McCluster had a really great return but the real greatness of it was blocking, the play itself was great all around. It wasn't a great individual effort the play was executed well from top to bottom.

Arenas had some more impressive individual returns even though they didn't pop big, what the hell is this argument even about?

dirk digler 09-14-2010 12:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 7003577)
Thanks for the info! I wonder if they're incorrect or CBS?

You would think NFL.com would be right. It doesn't really matter though the D played very good tonight for the most part. Definitely bend but don't break.

It was also refreshing seeing them actually cover their best player even if they had to triple team him

mikey23545 09-14-2010 12:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 7003573)
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/gametra...20100913_SD@KC

This is the link where I got my stats.

Out of curiosity, where are you seeing less? Not trying to be a dick, I'd just like another source in the future if CBS is incorrect.

Try deducting yards lost by sack next time, expert.

Mecca 09-14-2010 12:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 7003606)
Life a little tough on you right now?

Not nearly as tough as your memory is about tv shows.

Hootie 09-14-2010 12:12 AM

the funny thing is...

my co-workers officially think I'm a football genius...

we were real dead on wednesday and we were having dude time and we were talking about football...

and I told them that Seattle and KC were going to pull upsets...and these are the reasons why:

and I listed them

and everything I said happened down to the very last detail...

today my friend was like...

"man if the Chiefs really pull that upset I'm never going to doubt you again!"

this was a VERY good week in terms of me being right...and it's not always like that ;)

notorious 09-14-2010 12:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 7003614)
the funny thing is...

my co-workers officially think I'm a football genius...

we were real dead on wednesday and we were having dude time and we were talking about football...

and I told them that Seattle and KC were going to pull upsets...and these are the reasons why:

and I listed them

and everything I said happened down to the very last detail...

today my friend was like...

"man if the Chiefs really pull that upset I'm never going to doubt you again!"

this was a VERY good week in terms of me being right...and it's not always like that ;)




One thing.......






Have you started peeing on him yet? :)

'Hamas' Jenkins 09-14-2010 12:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 7003474)
how do you have credibility?

gholston
clausen
campbell

mocking my suggestion for mccluster to split return duties...

seriously

where is all this credential you think you have coming from?

how do you have credential to judge my credential?

huh?

answer me that

Roger Saffold, Terrance Knighton, Matt Forte, Jonathan Goff, Thomas DeCoud, Cliff Avril, Brandon Tate, Thomas Morestead, Tyvon Branch, Jasper Brinkley, Cary Harris, Carl Nicks, among others.


Those are all starters I've gotten in the 3rd-7th rounds of the Mock in the last couple of years. There are others out there too that I'm just forgetting about.

DaneMcCloud 09-14-2010 12:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikey23545 (Post 7003610)
Try deducting yards lost by sack next time, expert.

Uh, those weren't listed, Mr. Nice Guy.

Hootie 09-14-2010 12:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 7003607)
Look what Reaper is saying is fine. McCluster had a really great return but the real greatness of it was blocking, the play itself was great all around. It wasn't a great individual effort the play was executed well from top to bottom.

Arenas had some more impressive individual returns even though they didn't pop big, what the hell is this argument even about?

yeah you're right

the blocking was great...

blah blah blah blah

the cut was shit

mccluster is terrible

dude broken record

take your lumps

you're a negative, piece of shit, fake ass fan

period.

go warm up your 2% for 15 seconds...grab an oreo...and call it a night

Brock 09-14-2010 12:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 7003611)
Not nearly as tough as your memory is about tv shows.

That sounds suspiciously like meaningless babble. Which would surprise no one.

DaneMcCloud 09-14-2010 12:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 7003589)
The stats are different because player stats don't account for yards lost on sacks.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Basileus777 (Post 7003590)
I think the total yards is including yards lost via sacks.

Thanks. I'll stop using that site for information.

Nothing pisses me off more than to find out I've quoted false info.

Hootie 09-14-2010 12:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 7003624)
Roger Saffold, Terrance Knighton, Matt Forte, Jonathan Goff, Thomas DeCoud, Cliff Avril, Brandon Tate, Thomas Morestead, Tyvon Branch, Jasper Brinkley, Cary Harris, Carl Nicks, among others.


Those are all starters I've gotten in the 3rd-7th rounds of the Mock in the last couple of years. There are others out there too that I'm just forgetting about.

damn dude put all of those guys on the same team and you might be able to beat Michigan at the big house!

nice job!

el borracho 09-14-2010 12:14 AM

Ah, post #4, aka the invisible post. Sometimes after a miracle win it's fun to pretend that McCluster will return a punt for a touchdown every game and that the Chiefs really don't need a legit QB, or NT or LBs.

SenselessChiefsFan 09-14-2010 12:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 7003510)
Dominated? No. The Chargers had more than 400 yards of total offense.

Much improved? Absolutely.

Yeah, the Chargers had 400, or at least close to it. The majority of that was on Phillip Rivers. But, he was constantly harassed all game. And, the Chiefs defense was on the field for 37 minutes and 28 seconds.

Like I said, I wouldn't say dominated, but they played very well, against a good team, with a pro bowl QB that can move out of the pocket.

Oh, and let's not forget the three rookies in the secondary for much of the game.

The front seven had to play well to hide those guys.

Mecca 09-14-2010 12:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 7003628)
That sounds suspiciously like meaningless babble. Which would surprise no one.

Is it meaningless because it made you look like a reerun?

Reaper16 09-14-2010 12:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 7003607)
Look what Reaper is saying is fine. McCluster had a really great return but the real greatness of it was blocking, the play itself was great all around. It wasn't a great individual effort the play was executed well from top to bottom.

Arenas had some more impressive individual returns even though they didn't pop big, what the hell is this argument even about?

The argument, from my perspective, is that Hootie is using a Dexter McCluster performance which, outside of the easy-for-a-decent-return-man TD, saw Dexter get 9 offensive yards on 3 touches (5 targets) to solidify Hootie's personal genius. I took issue with that.

Brock 09-14-2010 12:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 7003635)
Is it meaningless because it made you look like a reerun?

Nobody knows what you're talking about. You're making yourself look like a babbling fool, as usual. Get a real job, get your life together and move out of your mom's house, for chrissake.

Hootie 09-14-2010 12:16 AM

I think I'm mostly frustrated about the fact I crushed the spread this week and didn't **** bet on anything except my stupid ass pick'em game on ESPN I play every year to keep track of my spread record.

Mecca 09-14-2010 12:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 7003637)
The argument, from my perspective, is that Hootie is using a Dexter McCluster performance which, outside of the easy-for-a-decent-return-man TD, saw Dexter get 9 offensive yards on 3 touches (5 targets) to solidify Hootie's personal genius. I took issue with that.

It's Hootie, it's like arguing with a 2 year old.

'Hamas' Jenkins 09-14-2010 12:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 7003631)
damn dude put all of those guys on the same team and you might be able to beat Michigan at the big house!

nice job!

Yeah, but 3rd-7th round picks don't matter.

Like Will Shields, Brandon Carr, Dave Szott, Jamaal Charles, or Joe Horn.

Bunit 09-14-2010 12:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 7003600)
I be sayin' that I ain't knockin' the brotha', I just be sayin' that if you wanna' crown his ass then crown his ass. But it's week one and Dex be all goin' down on first contact and shit on offense and wasn't particularly impressive outside of a return that wasn't as amazing as ya'll cats is making it out to be. I hope he earn dat crown though.

We got a witty mother****er here. I know who you are man. You are one of the "cats" on this board who talk with each other and think you know more shit than people who get paid to know their shit. You all start sucking each others dick and soon enough you think that your opinions are set in stone. That's who you are, right?

notorious 09-14-2010 12:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 7003629)
Thanks. I'll stop using that site for information.

Nothing pisses me off more than to find out I've quoted false info.

Sorry I was the 3rd person to tell you. It annoys me quite a bit to have several people tell me I am incorrect.

Mecca 09-14-2010 12:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 7003638)
Nobody knows what you're talking about. You're making yourself look like a babbling fool, as usual.

I just love how the minute someone makes you look bad for a second, you hate them and must try to make them look bad at every turn.

It's a message board, no need for the little man syndrome.

SenselessChiefsFan 09-14-2010 12:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by el borracho (Post 7003632)
Ah, post #4, aka the invisible post. Sometimes after a miracle win it's fun to pretend that McCluster will return a punt for a touchdown every game and that the Chiefs really don't need a legit QB, or NT or LBs.

Okay, there hasn't been a legit QB that the Chiefs could have drafted in the last two years, other than perhaps Freeman, but he was a reach where the Chiefs were.

And, the front seven looked good today.

The Chiefs don't win that game without McCluster and Arenas. Not with any fat NT you want to stick up there. Not with any linebacker you want to replace Belcher with, especially not any of the linebackers that were available in the second round.

Hootie 09-14-2010 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 7003637)
The argument, from my perspective, is that Hootie is using a Dexter McCluster performance which, outside of the easy-for-a-decent-return-man TD, saw Dexter get 9 offensive yards on 3 touches (5 targets) to solidify Hootie's personal genius. I took issue with that.

hahahaha

classic

game changing ability

a guy who can and will steal wins for us

but he's not an asset!

that's rich

and Arenas...he played a ton of defensive snaps tonight...

but yeah

part time players LMAO

we owned the draft and everyone gave us the A except our resident gurus...the drafturbators...

who...

for the THOUSANDTH TIME...

don't know shit

who doesn't have credibility now...

bitches?

Mecca 09-14-2010 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bunit (Post 7003644)
We got a witty mother****er here. I know who you are man. You are one of the "cats" on this board who talk with each other and think you know more shit than people who get paid to know their shit. You all start sucking each others dick and soon enough you think that your opinions are set in stone. That's who you are, right?

If you wanna talk about people suckin each others dicks you might wanna talk with Hootie instead of Reaper.

Reaper16 09-14-2010 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bunit (Post 7003644)
We got a witty mother****er here. I know who you are man. You are one of the "cats" on this board who talk with each other and think you know more shit than people who get paid to know their shit. You all start sucking each others dick and soon enough you think that your opinions are set in stone. That's who you are, right?

Are you speaking metaphorically?

Brock 09-14-2010 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 7003648)
I just love how the minute someone makes you look bad for a second, you hate them and must try to make them look bad at every turn.

It's a message board, no need for the little man syndrome.

I'm still trying to figure out how, in your mind, you've made me look bad for a second. You said some meaningless non-sequitur about a tv show? WTF is that? Jesus, just explain what you meant or shut the **** up.

ThaVirus 09-14-2010 12:20 AM

I think there's just a little miscommunication going on here regarding McCluster's cut. I don't believe anyone is saying it was the greatest cut or individual effort out there, but that the blocking was absolutely magnificent and it was capped off perfectly by a guy that (fan of him or not) can make the cuts that I'd say about 70% of guys can't...

I feel like I should say once again that there was nothing special about McCluster's cut. But his combo of vision, ability to cut on a dime in terrible field conditions, small size to squeeze through the hole, and phenomenal blocking lead to a great play and possibly the most important play of the game for us.

Cheers to the W-I-N!

BossChief 09-14-2010 12:20 AM

Mecca, it would be nice for just once to see you come on here and celebrate a damn win once in awhile. It was the same old shit after each win last year. Nitpicking and whatnot.

I hate to say it, but you are the only one that NEVER celebrates a Chiefs win, even in the slightest bit.

KCrockaholic 09-14-2010 12:20 AM

The defense was much improved. They kept Mathews in check, but then made Tolbert look like Mike Alstott.

But, I would say, a big part of the reason SD managed to rack up so many yards is because they had to find a way to get back in the game, so therefore Rivers was forced to throw a lot in the 2nd half. But I'll take this defense, giving up 400 yards and only allowing 14 points over the defense that plays like crap in the red zone, but holds the offense to 250 yards.

el borracho 09-14-2010 12:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 7003649)
Okay, there hasn't been a legit QB that the Chiefs could have drafted in the last two years, other than perhaps Freeman, but he was a reach where the Chiefs were.

And, the front seven looked good today.

The Chiefs don't win that game without McCluster and Arenas. Not with any fat NT you want to stick up there. Not with any linebacker you want to replace Belcher with, especially not any of the linebackers that were available in the second round.

Ok, is the 2010 draft all about the one game or is it about the next 5 years?

Saccopoo 09-14-2010 12:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 7003568)
they weren't going to beat us with the run today...

plain and simple

when we lose

it will be via the air...

Belcher is a beast against the run. The guy just fills the gaps and hits like a freight train. And he can wrap a guy up. That's what you want from a middle linebacker. And we are talking about a second year guy from Maine. His only direction is up. If DJ can give 75% every game of what he did tonight, we've got a nice linebacking crew for the season. Vrabel has lost a step, but it's like we've got a D-coordinator on the field when he is there. And Hali isn't elite, but he's all effort and never gives up on a play. If our front three come through all season long like they did tonight, the Chiefs have a chance to be respectable this season.

rambleonthruthefog 09-14-2010 12:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 7003642)
It's Hootie, it's like arguing with a 2 year old.

you are bundle of sticks ****ing whiny negative pathetic POS.

go chiefs!

'Hamas' Jenkins 09-14-2010 12:22 AM

Hootie, threads like this are why you are a douchebag.

The team comes off a great, emotionally charged win, and you feel that it's necessary to start a(n) (erroneous) thread about how you always loved those picks and how people who don't agree with you aren't fans.

What the **** would you know about it? Have you supported this team with season tickets from your own wallet? I have.

Have you paid for Sunday ticket from your own wallet? I have.

Did you watch every play of this, and every other preseason game? I did.

So where the **** do you get off characterizing my fan-hood? I've supported this team longer than you, I've spent more time and money on it.

You in this instance, just like with the McCluster pick, have no ****ing idea what you are talking about, and instead create a fictitious narrative that you fill with your own ritalin-addled drivel.

Read my posts in the game thread and tell me I'm not a fan. And use all caps, please, since you lack the basic writing ability to convey emphasis through use of the language.

KCrockaholic 09-14-2010 12:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 7003662)
Mecca, it would be nice for just once to see you come on here and celebrate a damn win once in awhile. It was the same old shit after each win last year. Nitpicking and whatnot.

I hate to say it, but you are the only one that NEVER celebrates a Chiefs win, even in the slightest bit.

I concur.

Reaper16 09-14-2010 12:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 7003660)
I think there's just a little miscommunication going on here regarding McCluster's cut. I don't believe anyone is saying it was the greatest cut or individual effort out there, but that the blocking was absolutely magnificent and it was capped off perfectly by a guy that (fan of him or not) can make the cuts that I'd say about 70% of guys can't...

I feel like I should say once again that there was nothing special about McCluster's cut. But his combo of vision, ability to cut on a dime in terrible field conditions, small size to squeeze through the hole, and phenomenal blocking lead to a great play and possibly the most important play of the game for us.

Cheers to the W-I-N!

I can't disagree with any of this.

Mecca 09-14-2010 12:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 7003662)
Mecca, it would be nice for just once to see you come on here and celebrate a damn win once in awhile. It was the same old shit after each win last year. Nitpicking and whatnot.

I hate to say it, but you are the only one that NEVER celebrates a Chiefs win, even in the slightest bit.

What the **** did I say that was bad? Did you see the other thread I was posting in?

And of course I should be a super nice guy in a thread from a guy who is a complete jackass making threads to insult people right?

rambleonthruthefog 09-14-2010 12:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 7003660)
I think there's just a little miscommunication going on here regarding McCluster's cut. I don't believe anyone is saying it was the greatest cut or individual effort out there, but that the blocking was absolutely magnificent and it was capped off perfectly by a guy that (fan of him or not) can make the cuts that I'd say about 70% of guys can't...

I feel like I should say once again that there was nothing special about McCluster's cut. But his combo of vision, ability to cut on a dime in terrible field conditions, small size to squeeze through the hole, and phenomenal blocking lead to a great play and possibly the most important play of the game for us.

Cheers to the W-I-N!

also, he's fast

Reaper16 09-14-2010 12:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 7003662)
Mecca, it would be nice for just once to see you come on here and celebrate a damn win once in awhile. It was the same old shit after each win last year. Nitpicking and whatnot.

I hate to say it, but you are the only one that NEVER celebrates a Chiefs win, even in the slightest bit.

To be fair, as soon as the game was over, Hootie started this divisive thread.

Mecca 09-14-2010 12:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rambleonthruthefog (Post 7003675)
you are bundle of sticks ****ing whiny negative pathetic POS.

go chiefs!

Ugh, **** off.

I didn't remotely say anything negative yet I get this.

Jerm 09-14-2010 12:24 AM

:popcorn:

Bunit 09-14-2010 12:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 7003654)
Are you speaking metaphorically?

No Shakespeare round here.

'Hamas' Jenkins 09-14-2010 12:24 AM

..

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6169357)
I hope they trade Dorsey and DJ...all we've heard all along is how Dorsey doesn't really fit into the 3-4...we drafted Magee for a reason...

Shit...give us a 2nd for Dorsey and a 4th for DJ and lets turn this shit around...I mean...come the **** on...we have $55M invested in our DE's in a 3-4...just get him off of our team while he still has SOME value...

If he has been so terrific so far...since he was once considered such a great talent...shit...maybe we'll sucker a 1st out of him...I'll jack off to tranny porn for a month straight if that happens.


Mecca 09-14-2010 12:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcrockaholic4life (Post 7003680)
I concur.

Show me how I'm being an awful, negative fan seriously.

Pasta Little Brioni 09-14-2010 12:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcrockaholic4life (Post 7003663)
The defense was much improved. They kept Mathews in check, but then made Tolbert look like Mike Alstott.

But, I would say, a big part of the reason SD managed to rack up so many yards is because they had to find a way to get back in the game, so therefore Rivers was forced to throw a lot in the 2nd half. But I'll take this defense, giving up 400 yards and only allowing 14 points over the defense that plays like crap in the red zone, but holds the offense to 250 yards.

I'll take 14 points allowed against that team anyday.

-King- 09-14-2010 12:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 7003637)
The argument, from my perspective, is that Hootie is using a Dexter McCluster performance which, outside of the easy-for-a-decent-return-man TD, saw Dexter get 9 offensive yards on 3 touches (5 targets) to solidify Hootie's personal genius. I took issue with that.

Let's ignore the fact that cassel is the qb. Let's also ignore that bowe and chambers had worse stats....



Lmao you're argument is weak
Posted via Mobile Device

Quesadilla Joe 09-14-2010 12:25 AM

Kinda funny that only draft pick that the draft guys wanted was Berry and he gave up both TD's.

Basileus777 09-14-2010 12:26 AM

A full-on Hootie meltdown is coming up.

Reaper16 09-14-2010 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bunit (Post 7003688)
No Shakespeare round here.

No metaphors? OK, then yes, I actually suck dicks.

-King- 09-14-2010 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 7003699)
Kinda funny that only draft pick that the draft guys wanted was Berry and he gave up both TD's.

Funny how that works. It's also funnier that you guys are 0 and 1 and 2-9 your last 11 games. Hahaha
Posted via Mobile Device

Brock 09-14-2010 12:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 7003699)
Kinda funny that only draft pick that the draft guys wanted was Berry and he gave up both TD's.

Yeah, he's a bust. We need to cut him.

Reaper16 09-14-2010 12:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcChiefsKing (Post 7003698)
Let's ignore the fact that cassel is the qb. Let's also ignore that bowe and chambers had worse stats....



Lmao you're argument is weak
Posted via Mobile Device

So... you think that Hootie is a genius then? Because that is what you're saying.

Hootie 09-14-2010 12:27 AM

Hamas you gave our draft a D+...

a D+...

THAT'S RIGHT

A D+...

and tonight?

we started Berry and Moeaki...

McCluster and Arenas were PIVOTAL PLAYMAKERS who contributed heavily to our win...

shit...the only pick you liked (Berry) pretty much sucked ass tonight...

and we're not even counting guys like Asomoah and K. Lewis who are probably going to be good players in the future...

so again

you're and idiot

again and again and again

you're a know-it-all who doesn't seem to know very much...

not a good combination

Saccopoo 09-14-2010 12:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 7003633)
Yeah, the Chargers had 400, or at least close to it. The majority of that was on Phillip Rivers. But, he was constantly harassed all game. And, the Chiefs defense was on the field for 37 minutes and 28 seconds.

Like I said, I wouldn't say dominated, but they played very well, against a good team, with a pro bowl QB that can move out of the pocket.

Oh, and let's not forget the three rookies in the secondary for much of the game.

The front seven had to play well to hide those guys.

Actually, thinking about it, Rivers impressed me a lot tonight. Other than the Casselesque crossbar pass on the second to last Chargers drive.

Hootie 09-14-2010 12:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 7003699)
Kinda funny that only draft pick that the draft guys wanted was Berry and he gave up both TD's.

kinda funny how we beat the Chargers and you lost to the...

....

Jags

LMAO

Bunit 09-14-2010 12:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 7003684)
To be fair, as soon as the game was over, Hootie started this divisive thread.

Yeah Reaper, but to be fair he started this thread I'm guessing because Mecca was one of the whiney bitches who cried about McCluster, Moeaki, and Arenas. Holla.

rambleonthruthefog 09-14-2010 12:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 7003686)
Ugh, **** off.

I didn't remotely say anything negative yet I get this.

i stand by remarks. as a whole, day in and day out, you are what you are: knowledgable about football, yet still a know it all, excuse making, not giving credit where its due, negative, crawfishing MFer.

notorious 09-14-2010 12:28 AM

The Chiefs are learning how to win.


We as Chiefs fans need to learn how to act when we win.


We are at each other's throats after a win. JFC :facepalm:

-King- 09-14-2010 12:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 7003710)
So... you think that Hootie is a genius then? Because that is what you're saying.

What I'm saying has nothing to do with hootie. I don't know how you got that
Posted via Mobile Device

Basileus777 09-14-2010 12:29 AM

Hootie it's still one game. Make this thread after 10 games and you will have some basis.

'Hamas' Jenkins 09-14-2010 12:29 AM

I was against Dorsey, McCluster, and DJ before I was for them/John "Hootie" Kerry

Mecca 09-14-2010 12:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 7003724)
The Chiefs are learning how to win.


We as Chiefs fans need to learn how to act when we win.


We are at each other's throats after a win. JFC :facepalm:

That kinda happens when divisive threads are started for this exact purpose.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.