ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   NFL Draft Matt Barkley Files NFL Paperwork (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=253185)

BigCatDaddy 12-02-2011 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 8161671)
AlbertBreer Albert Breer
Just talked with an exec who thinks Boise's Kellen Moore is a better prospect than Baylor's Robert Griffin. Kinda interesting.
30 Nov Favorite Retweet Reply

ROFL Watch it be Pioli

Moore>Tebow

Titty Meat 12-02-2011 01:59 PM

Barkley his last 6 games 70% completion 23 TD's 2 INT.

The guy is a ****ing stud.

BossChief 12-02-2011 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 8161678)
he plays in California....that is awesome...i've heard it all now

:facepalm:

So, Barkley NEVER having played in a snow game in his life is of no concern to you?

Not even when roughly half his games in KC would be under these conditions?

JFC, if some of you want to just pick anybody and not talk objectively about their positives and negatives, to each their own...but some of us want to go in with our eyes open.

The Franchise 12-02-2011 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8161697)
:facepalm:

So, Barkley NEVER having played in a snow game in his life is of no concern to you?

Not even when roughly half his games in KC would be under these conditions?

JFC, if some of you want to just pick anybody and not talk objectively about their positives and negatives, to each their own...but some of us want to go in with our eyes open.

Aaron Rodgers?

BossChief 12-02-2011 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 8161696)
Barkley his last 6 games 70% completion 23 TD's 2 INT.

The guy is a ****ing stud.

very impressive.

Id still trade our 1, 2 and next years 2 to go up and take Luck over him.

the Talking Can 12-02-2011 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8161697)
:facepalm:

So, Barkley NEVER having played in a snow game in his life is of no concern to you?

Not even when roughly half his games in KC would be under these conditions?

JFC, if some of you want to just pick anybody and not talk objectively about their positives and negatives, to each their own...but some of us want to go in with our eyes open.

no, him playing in California means nothing, it is ****ing stupid

I mean look what happened to Rodgers in Green Bay...sometimes he can't even throw because he's too busy holding a cup of hot chocolate to warm his California hands...

BossChief 12-02-2011 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 8161699)
Aaron Rodgers?

Barkley isnt gonna drop into the 20s and be given 3 years to sit and adjust.

Look, if we are sitting at 2nd overall....Im taking Barkley and the pick would be made in less than 1 minute as I would run the card up myself.

Im just trying to have a conversation about his negatives and see what the responses are and how people perceive some of his flaws (if we want to call them that)

the Talking Can 12-02-2011 02:08 PM

and does it work the other way?

are college QBs from Michigan avoided by pro-teams in California?

too sweaty to hold onto the ball or something?

BigCatDaddy 12-02-2011 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8161697)
:facepalm:


JFC, if some of you want to just pick anybody and not talk objectively about their positives and negatives, to each their own...but some of us want to go in with our eyes open.

I'm all for that, let's just make sure we get SOMEBODY.

Hammock Parties 12-02-2011 02:11 PM

RGIII > Barkley

The Franchise 12-02-2011 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8161717)
Barkley isnt gonna drop into the 20s and be given 3 years to sit and adjust.

Look, if we are sitting at 2nd overall....Im taking Barkley and the pick would be made in less than 1 minute as I would run the card up myself.

Im just trying to have a conversation about his negatives and see what the responses are and how people perceive some of his flaws (if we want to call them that)

So what you're saying is that if Rodgers didn't get the chance to sit for 3 years.....that he wouldn't have been able to adjust to the winter games?

Seriously?

BossChief 12-02-2011 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 8161714)
no, him playing in California means nothing, it is ****ing stupid

I mean look what happened to Rodgers in Green Bay...sometimes he can't even throw because he's too busy holding a cup of hot chocolate to warm his California hands...

JFC

get a grip

Aaron Rogers had 3 ****ing years to practice and adjust to the difference in playing conditions.

Nobody will ever know what would have happened if he was let loose as a rookie in those conditions...we do know what happened to his predecessors who did.

If you want to just cover your eyes and act like he is perfect in every way, fine.

I will chose to be objective and bring up points to talk about that are very valid.

Him having never thrown (or pump fake, or take a shotgun snap or secure the ball while taking a sack) a frozen football is one of them.

BossChief 12-02-2011 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 8161726)
So what you're saying is that if Rodgers didn't get the chance to sit for 3 years.....that he wouldn't have been able to adjust to the winter games?

Seriously?

not at all, Im just saying that we have no sample size to show us how he responds to those conditions...

BossChief 12-02-2011 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 8161718)
and does it work the other way?

are college QBs from Michigan avoided by pro-teams in California?

too sweaty to hold onto the ball or something?

thats just reeruned

the Talking Can 12-02-2011 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8161727)
JFC

get a grip

Aaron Rogers had 3 ****ing years to practice and adjust to the difference in playing conditions.

Nobody will ever know what would have happened if he was let loose as a rookie in those conditions...we do know what happened to his predecessors who did.

If you want to just cover your eyes and act like he is perfect in every way, fine.

I will chose to be objective and bring up points to talk about that are very valid.

Him having never thrown (or pump fake, or take a shotgun snap or secure the ball while taking a sack) a frozen football is one of them.


this is about the dumbest thing I've ever heard....playing in California is now a knock against football players...because they've never experienced cold weather...

it is straight up reeruned...

I expect to read a lot of scouting reports this year that mention this, right?

BigCatDaddy 12-02-2011 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8161727)
Nobody will ever know what would have happened if he was let loose as a rookie in those conditions...we do know what happened to his predecessors who did.

You mean Brett Favre? Who played at Ole Miss and spent his first year in Atlanata before taking over in the 4th game of his 2nd year in the leage?

the Talking Can 12-02-2011 02:19 PM

Barkley

Cons:

plays for USC
plays in California
doesn't own a winter coat
expects to be paid to play football

Pros:

not black


RG3

Cons:

black
plays in an option offense
gets injured a a lot because of the option offense he doesn't actually play in
black

Pros:

owns a winter coat

BossChief 12-02-2011 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 8161745)
this is about the dumbest thing I've ever heard....playing in California is now a knock against football players...because they've never experienced cold weather...

it is straight up reeruned...

I expect to read a lot of scouting reports this year that mention this, right?

Right now, you are sounding like Pioli Zombie defending anything patriot.

Its ok to talk about things that concerns about the kids we have a chance at drafting, isnt it?

I think Ive been very fair in my comments on Barkley and have been pointing out his strengths as well as his weaknesses...its too bad that anything said about him that isn't roses and rainbows is taken as "true fan" or whatever.

Does the fact that he hasnt ever played in a snow game a damning trait?

**** that, no.

He could end up being the best NFL QB in bad weather for all we know, or he could end up a guy with an average arm that his passes float when the weather gets bad and that leads him to be far less effective.

Im just saying its a point of concern that we play half the year under less than perfect conditions and that there is no tape of Barkley in those situations.

thats all

the Talking Can 12-02-2011 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8161772)
Right now, you are sounding like Pioli Zombie defending anything patriot.

Its ok to talk about things that concerns about the kids we have a chance at drafting, isnt it?

I think Ive been very fair in my comments on Barkley and have been pointing out his strengths as well as his weaknesses...its too bad that anything said about him that isn't roses and rainbows is taken as "true fan" or whatever.

Does the fact that he hasnt ever played in a snow game a damning trait?

**** that, no.

He could end up being the best NFL QB in bad weather for all we know, or he could end up a guy with an average arm that his passes float when the weather gets bad and that leads him to be far less effective.

Im just saying its a point of concern that we play half the year under less than perfect conditions and that there is no tape of Barkley in those situations.

thats all


yes, I look forwarded to reading all the scouting reports of California players that mention they may not be able to handle cold weather...

the validity of your concern will be easy to prove when the draft rolls around and Mel and McShay are discussing how California QBs are unproven in cold weather...

I'll bump this thread then and apologize to you for being wrong about such an incredible insight...

BossChief 12-02-2011 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 8161757)
Barkley

Cons:

plays for USC
plays in California
doesn't own a winter coat
expects to be paid to play football

Pros:

not black


RG3

Cons:

black
plays in an option offense
gets injured a a lot because of the option offense he doesn't actually play in
black

Pros:

owns a winter coat

So, that's how strawmen arguments work.

Thanks.

Dayze 12-02-2011 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 8161757)
Barkley

Cons:

plays for USC
plays in California
doesn't own a winter coat
expects to be paid to play football

Pros:

not black


RG3

Cons:

black
plays in an option offense
gets injured a a lot because of the option offense he doesn't actually play in
black

Pros:

owns a winter coat

LMAO

BossChief 12-02-2011 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 8161787)
yes, I look forwarded to reading all the scouting reports of California players that mention they may not be able to handle cold weather...

the validity of your concern will be easy to prove when the draft rolls around and Mel and McShay are discussing how California QBs are unproven in cold weather...

I'll bump this thread then and apologize to you for being wrong about such an incredible insight...

@LATimesklein Gary Klein
Matt Barkley said he would be prepared for cold weather after making snow angels while shirtless as a kid.
1 Nov via TweetDeck

ROFL

Seems Im not the only one asking about him in cold weather.

the Talking Can 12-02-2011 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8161795)
So, that's how strawmen arguments work.

Thanks.

no, that's how I make fun of people who believe California players are going to be judged by scouts based on the weather....

Fritz88 12-02-2011 02:35 PM

The Jizz over Barkley = Jizz over Clausen.

Bark = Claus

RealSNR 12-02-2011 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8161809)
@LATimesklein Gary Klein
Matt Barkley said he would be prepared for cold weather after making snow angels while shirtless as a kid.
1 Nov via TweetDeck

ROFL

Seems Im not the only one asking about him in cold weather.

Great. Now he's gay.

So we either get the black QB or the gay California pansy.

WHY DO YOU HATE US, GOD??

BossChief 12-02-2011 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 8161811)
no, that's how I make fun of people who believe California players are going to be judged by scouts based on the weather....

You are a fool if you don't think its a factor.

As I have already said multiple times in this thread, I would take Barkley if we are drafting 2nd overall and it wouldn't take me more than a minute to get the card up to GODell.

Doesn't mean the lacking experience in cold weather isn't a factor into it, though.

That is all.

BossChief 12-02-2011 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 8161842)
Great. Now he's gay.

So we either get the black QB or the gay California pansy.

WHY DO YOU HATE US, GOD??

I would be willing to bet money that if Barkley and Jones are both on the board, these **** sticks will with either take Landry ****ing Jones or Ryan Kahlil.

To me, he just looks like a younger, more polished version of their golden boy.

Hammock Parties 12-02-2011 02:42 PM

Now Pioli is a ****stick?

FLIP FLOPPER

RealSNR 12-02-2011 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8161848)
I would be willing to bet money that if Barkley and Jones are both on the board, these **** sticks will with either take Landry ****ing Jones or Ryan Kahlil.

To me, he just looks like a younger, more polished version of their golden boy.

I'm dreading that the one executive who said that Kellen Moore > RGIII is actually Pioli. I would not be surprised at all if it's him. It probably is, in fact.

And yet I'm so ****ing desperate for a first round QB for this team I wouldn't be pissed if the Chiefs drafted Moore in the 1st round. How pathetic is that?

Titty Meat 12-02-2011 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fritz88 (Post 8161835)
The Jizz over Barkley = Jizz over Clausen.

Bark = Claus

Lol.

Nightfyre 12-02-2011 02:45 PM

I don't think Barkley has the arm strength to succeed at the next level. The way he spoke about the Heisman in that interview also leads me to believe hes not a super team-player.

BossChief 12-02-2011 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fritz88 (Post 8161835)
The Jizz over Barkley = Jizz over Clausen.

Bark = Claus

this reminds me of a thought I had last night.

3 quarterbacks have been the center of discussion around here the last 3 years or so.

Mark Sanchez
Jimmy Clausen
Blaine Gabbert

I wonder if all three will be available via trade during the offseason.

NY seems about ready to move on
Jimmy is buried
New regime might want a new QB in Jacksonville.

Id be ok with throwing a mid rounder for any of them....maybe a 2nd and change for Gabbert

Hammock Parties 12-02-2011 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 8161864)
I'm dreading that the one executive who said that Kellen Moore > RGIII is actually Pioli. I would not be surprised at all if it's him. It probably is, in fact.

And yet I'm so ****ing desperate for a first round QB for this team I wouldn't be pissed if the Chiefs drafted Moore in the 1st round. How pathetic is that?

Kellen Moore is 6-1 and 190 lbs.

No GM in this league is taking him in the 1st.

Titty Meat 12-02-2011 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8161874)
this reminds me of a thought I had last night.

3 quarterbacks have been the center of discussion around here the last 3 years or so.

Mark Sanchez
Jimmy Clausen
Blaine Gabbert

I wonder if all three will be available via trade during the offseason.

NY seems about ready to move on
Jimmy is buried
New regime might want a new QB in Jacksonville.

Id be ok with throwing a mid rounder for any of them....maybe a 2nd and change for Gabbert

You're pandering with Gabbert. Stop he sucks.

Sanchez isn't going anywhere.

If Jacksonville was going to get a new QB they would have fired Gene Smith the guy responsible for drafting Gabbert.

the Talking Can 12-02-2011 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 8161864)
I'm dreading that the one executive who said that Kellen Moore > RGIII is actually Pioli. I would not be surprised at all if it's him. It probably is, in fact.

And yet I'm so ****ing desperate for a first round QB for this team I wouldn't be pissed if the Chiefs drafted Moore in the 1st round. How pathetic is that?

moore is better than stanzi, wouldn't freak if they took him late

the Talking Can 12-02-2011 02:51 PM

plus Moore is a cold weather QB, so one less thing to worry about...

BossChief 12-02-2011 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Omega (Post 8161858)
Now Pioli is a ****stick?

FLIP FLOPPER

I have no faith in Piolis ability to identify quarterback talent nor do I have any faith left that Haley would know who to play, either.

I have the utmost respect for the way Pioli has gone about building the rest of this roster, though.

No flip flopping there, at all.

My one hope is that Pioli put a lot of bad rumors out about Stanzi predraft to throw teams off the scent and that he got his kid at a discount due to that.

Just blind hope on that one, though.
Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 8161864)
I'm dreading that the one executive who said that Kellen Moore > RGIII is actually Pioli. I would not be surprised at all if it's him. It probably is, in fact.

And yet I'm so ****ing desperate for a first round QB for this team I wouldn't be pissed if the Chiefs drafted Moore in the 1st round. How pathetic is that?

I dont think it was an executive, it seems like it was one scout.

Im with you, though.

Just draft one....I dont even care if he busts.

Just




TRY


Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightfyre (Post 8161872)
I don't think Barkley has the arm strength to succeed at the next level. The way he spoke about the Heisman in that interview also leads me to believe hes not a super team-player.

his arm isn't bad whatsoever....its actually above average, but arm strength is absolutely magnified in cold weather.

Titty Meat 12-02-2011 02:52 PM

Todd Haley won't be here next year bruh.

BossChief 12-02-2011 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Omega (Post 8161878)
Kellen Moore is 6-1 and 190 lbs.

No GM in this league is taking him in the 1st.

damn, is he really that small?

He doesnt look "big" by any stretch, but he doesnt look smaller than Brodie...

strange

BossChief 12-02-2011 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 8161897)
Todd Haley won't be here next year bruh.

Maybe.

Im ok wither way.....if Haley stays, good. I think he deserves a chance to coach this team at full strength with a good quarterback.

If he is fired, that probably ups our chances of drafting a QBOTF by at least 25%

BossChief 12-02-2011 02:59 PM

FTR, I think RG3 comes in closer to 6' 200 when the combine rolls around.

I dont see a kid that is 6'2 220 when I watch Baylor.

Titty Meat 12-02-2011 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8161910)
Maybe.

Im ok wither way.....if Haley stays, good. I think he deserves a chance to coach this team at full strength with a good quarterback.

If he is fired, that probably ups our chances of drafting a QBOTF by at least 25%

If that's what it takes to get a new QB then goodbye Todd. This team isn't winning shit with Cassel.

Hammock Parties 12-02-2011 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8161912)
FTR, I think RG3 comes in closer to 6' 200 when the combine rolls around.

I dont see a kid that is 6'2 220 when I watch Baylor.

Would be interesting if he fell to the bottom of the 2nd.

BossChief 12-02-2011 03:03 PM

Right now, Id be perfectly fine if we traded

Bowe
Carr
Dorsey
and our 1st

If that would be enough to move up to take Andrew Luck.

I think there is enough of a gap between he and the rest of the field for that to be worthwhile.

If Im Indy, I probably take that deal.

BossChief 12-02-2011 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Omega (Post 8161916)
Would be interesting if he fell to the bottom of the 2nd.

It wouldnt matter THAT MUCH.

Vick was about that size and went 1st overall.

I dont see a way RG3 gets out of the top 10.

Mecca 12-02-2011 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightfyre (Post 8161872)
I don't think Barkley has the arm strength to succeed at the next level. The way he spoke about the Heisman in that interview also leads me to believe hes not a super team-player.

Without being bowl eligible that's really about all there was to play for.

Look at Bakley's numbers from year to year and how he improved also he's a true junior not a redshirt. So it's not like he got a year of sitting to learn.

Hammock Parties 12-02-2011 03:14 PM

Mecca let's hear your full breakdown on Barkley.

Mecca 12-02-2011 03:23 PM

I like the guy, I think he's mentally strong, he could have transferred out with all the crap that happened while he was there yet he chose to stay. People look at this year where SC really rebounded and say it's talent around him, but it's very very young talent. Outside of Kalil and the RB tandem that is ok at best every impact player on that offense is a freshman or sophomore.

Barkley is really the glue that kept that team together and moving forward in a pretty difficult time for that university. I alone think that is a reason he'd be a good fit here, I like the talent level but I l like his makeup more. Any guy who as a true sophomore is the glue that keeps his team together says a lot to me.

No matter how he comes off in an interview, Barkley is a very hard worker and puts in the time to be good. This is guy that lost weight in his time with SC to become more mobile in the pocket.

Personally I think Barkley would be a great fit here, all his teammates love him, he's tough played through injuries, he can make all the throws and he's been the unquestioned leader on that team for nearly the entire time he's been there.

Mecca 12-02-2011 03:27 PM

Mayock called Barkley a more polished Andy Dalton...who here would take Andy Dalton right now?

I also want everyone to understand something, outside of Kalil he plays behind a shit oline. The guards are average and young, the center is crap and the RT is an overmatched freshman.

BossChief 12-02-2011 03:30 PM

While I didnt see as much of Dalton in college, I did catch a couple games and I do think that Dalton and Barkley are comparable.

Then again, I also think Stanzi is comparable to Dalton in many ways...so, who know?

the Talking Can 12-02-2011 03:42 PM

Dalton is part of the reason I don't really care who we take (even though I have my preferences)...I would have never thought he'd play this way as a rookie...he had the least 'flash' of any QB coming out...

I was never even impressed with him when I saw him play, other than thinking he was tough...

Titty Meat 12-02-2011 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8162015)
While I didnt see as much of Dalton in college, I did catch a couple games and I do think that Dalton and Barkley are comparable.

Then again, I also think Stanzi is comparable to Dalton in many ways...so, who know?

Stanzi sucks give it up dude.

Titty Meat 12-02-2011 04:08 PM

Who can forget the game winning drive vs OSU when Barkley was a freshmen?

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/4UHftDbXiuk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Mecca 12-02-2011 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 8162140)
Who can forget the game winning drive vs OSU when Barkley was a freshmen?

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/4UHftDbXiuk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

And he's improved leaps and bounds since then.

RealSNR 12-02-2011 04:21 PM

I've decided to say, "**** Barkley." Don't want him.

Matt Leinart

Matt Cassel

Matt Ryan

Matt Schaub

Matt Sanchez

TOO MANY ****ING SHITTY MATT QBS WHO CAN'T PLAY IN COLD WEATHER

Deberg_1990 12-02-2011 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 8161994)
I like the guy, I think he's mentally strong, he could have transferred out with all the crap that happened while he was there yet he chose to stay. People look at this year where SC really rebounded and say it's talent around him, but it's very very young talent. Outside of Kalil and the RB tandem that is ok at best every impact player on that offense is a freshman or sophomore.

Barkley is really the glue that kept that team together and moving forward in a pretty difficult time for that university. I alone think that is a reason he'd be a good fit here, I like the talent level but I l like his makeup more. Any guy who as a true sophomore is the glue that keeps his team together says a lot to me.

No matter how he comes off in an interview, Barkley is a very hard worker and puts in the time to be good. This is guy that lost weight in his time with SC to become more mobile in the pocket.

Personally I think Barkley would be a great fit here, all his teammates love him, he's tough played through injuries, he can make all the throws and he's been the unquestioned leader on that team for nearly the entire time he's been there.

So basically hes Mark Sanchez 2.0

Titty Meat 12-02-2011 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 8162168)
So basically hes Mark Sanchez 2.0

Goodness the idiocy on this board has to be at an all time high.

Chiefnj2 12-02-2011 06:06 PM

With all of the training and coaching he's received in his life, I wonder how much more of a ceiling Barkley has. I don't know if there is much room for improvement.

Here is a detailed scouting report on him (cbssportsline):

Accuracy: Is generally a very accurate passer who places the ball in position for his receiver to generate yardage after the catch. Adept at the back-shoulder fade and in zipping slants between defenders. Has a tendency to throw slightly behind receivers running crossing routes from his right to his left. Is consistently more accurate to receivers running left to right. Good ball placement on touch passes down the seam. Struggles consistently hitting receivers in stride on the deep ball. Typically overthrows the route, making his receiver the only one capable of catching up to the ball. Doesn't own a howitzer, however, and some of his deep passes can hang too long as a result.

Arm Strength: Has the ability to make every throw, but has only slightly above average arm strength, overall. Zips short and intermediate routes, but relies more on timing and accuracy, rather than arm strength for the deep out. Only an average deep ball passer.

Setup/Release: Among his better attributes. Takes virtually all of his snaps from under center and gains depth efficiently while keeping his eyes downfield. Sets his feet and steps into his throws when he given room. Has a compact, over the top throwing motion with good follow-through. Has shown the ability to drop his release point to evade oncoming pass rushers.

Reading Defenses: Another strength. An intelligent passer who has the freedom and understanding of the offense to call audibles at the line. Good poise in the pocket. Trusts his protection and keep a running clock in his head, looking to secondary targets before vacating the pocket. Rarely throws into the teeth of the defense and when he does so, he shows good accuracy to adjust his throw so that only his receiver should have a play on the ball.

On The Move: Lacks the foot speed and agility to ever be a true threat as a scrambler, but is an alert ball-carrier who will take yardage given to him. Often used on rollouts in this offense, especially moving to his right. Impressive accuracy on the move, even when not allowed to set his feet. Has to learn to run lower and gain strength in his lower body to improve on the quarterback sneak.

Intangibles: The only freshman in team history to start at quarterback in the season-opener and the first for any team ranked in the AP's top five to do so since No. 3 Michigan's Rick Leach did so in 1975. The first true sophomore to ever be named a captain at USC. Legitimate concerns about his size and durability. Has missed at least one game in each of his first two seasons due to injury, including an ankle sprain in 2010 (missed second half of Oregon State, Notre Dame) and a bruised right (throwing) shoulder in 2009 (missed Washington). Also underwent surgery on his right wrist prior to 2010 spring practice.

--Rob Rang

Hammock Parties 12-02-2011 06:10 PM

Reads like a less mobile Cassel.

Titty Meat 12-02-2011 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Omega (Post 8162354)
Reads like a less mobile Cassel.

Really? Cassel is accurate and can read defenses?

Hammock Parties 12-02-2011 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 8162367)
Really? Cassel is accurate and can read defenses?

Struggles consistently hitting receivers in stride on the deep ball. Typically overthrows the route, making his receiver the only one capable of catching up to the ball. Doesn't own a howitzer, however, and some of his deep passes can hang too long as a result.

whoman69 12-02-2011 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 8162367)
Really? Cassel is accurate and can read defenses?

Cassel is accurate out to 4 yards but don't expect him to put the receiver in a position to get YAC. Cassel is a dyslexic QB. Tyler Palko can read defenses better.

Titty Meat 12-02-2011 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Omega (Post 8162375)
Struggles consistently hitting receivers in stride on the deep ball. Typically overthrows the route, making his receiver the only one capable of catching up to the ball. Doesn't own a howitzer, however, and some of his deep passes can hang too long as a result.

Arm Strength: Has the ability to make every throw

Hammock Parties 12-02-2011 06:26 PM

And yet his long passes "float."

RGIII > Barkley

mdchiefsfan 12-02-2011 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 8162006)
Mayock called Barkley a more polished Andy Dalton...who here would take Andy Dalton right now?

I also want everyone to understand something, outside of Kalil he plays behind a shit oline. The guards are average and young (Hudson/Asomoah), the center is crap (Weigmann) and the RT is an overmatched freshman (Richardson).

he would fit right in here then.

BossChief 12-02-2011 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Omega (Post 8162384)
And yet his long passes "float."

RGIII > Barkley

Tell me something about physics.

If a player has just enough arm strength to "float" his deep passes in 70 degree temperature, what happens when he throws that same pass a 10 below?

Titty Meat 12-02-2011 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Omega (Post 8162384)
And yet his long passes "float."

RGIII > Barkley

It's doubtful you've watched either play.

BossChief 12-02-2011 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 8162132)
Stanzi sucks give it up dude.

In his first year starting, he brought his team back from a 20 point deficit by throwing 4 touchdowns in the fourth quarter alone.

Quarterbacks that suck cant do that.

You guys point to Barkleys statistical improvement as proof of his coachability and leadership, but Stanzi had about the same arc of improvement over his three years starting.

You know when Ill admit he sucks?

When he shows that he does on the field.

Till then, I will believe that he is a good quarterback.

the Talking Can 12-02-2011 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8162459)
Tell me something about physics.

If a player has just enough arm strength to "float" his deep passes in 70 degree temperature, what happens when he throws that same pass a 10 below?

LMAO


you are a ****ing gold mine...

tredadda 12-02-2011 07:57 PM

What blows my mind is those who find faults in Barkley and RGIII while apparently ignoring the flaws on our "future HOF" QBs we have on this roster. I will take the upside of a Barkley or RGIII over the upside of a Cassel or Orton any day of the week.

tredadda 12-02-2011 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8161705)
very impressive.

Id still trade our 1, 2 and next years 2 to go up and take Luck over him.

So would most people, but we all highly doubt it would be enough, nor would Indy make that trade. Also highly doubtful Pioli would either.

BossChief 12-02-2011 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 8162489)
LMAO


you are a ****ing gold mine...

Let me ask you a question about physics to see if you understand the logic behind what Im talking about.

*What makes the kickoffs fall much shorter once the temperature drops?

Does the kickers legs get tired once it gets cold out?
Do they wear different shoes that make the ball purposely travel a shorter distance?

Science.

How does it work TTC?

BossChief 12-02-2011 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda (Post 8162495)
So would most people, but we all highly doubt it would be enough, nor would Indy make that trade. Also highly doubtful Pioli would either.

doesnt mean I cant waste my time talking about it.

Titty Meat 12-02-2011 08:00 PM

Boss is going all Building 7 on us.

whoman69 12-02-2011 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda (Post 8162494)
What blows my mind is those who find faults in Barkley and RGIII while apparently ignoring the flaws on our "future HOF" QBs we have on this roster. I will take the upside of a Barkley or RGIII over the upside of a Cassel or Orton any day of the week.

Cassel and Orton have upside? I'm sure they'll be glad to hear it and so would we because its the first we've heard about it.

BossChief 12-02-2011 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda (Post 8162494)
What blows my mind is those who find faults in Barkley and RGIII while apparently ignoring the flaws on our "future HOF" QBs we have on this roster. I will take the upside of a Barkley or RGIII over the upside of a Cassel or Orton any day of the week.

not sure I understand what you are talking about.

If you are round about talking to me, well...I have said a few times that I would take Barkley if we were sitting at #2 and I am one of the biggest Stanzi fans on this board.

the Talking Can 12-02-2011 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8162497)
Let me ask you a question about physics to see if you understand the logic behind what Im talking about.

*What makes the kickoffs fall much shorter once the temperature drops?

Does the kickers legs get tired once it gets cold out?
Do they wear different shoes that make the ball purposely travel a shorter distance?

Science.

How does it work TTC?

LMAO

tredadda 12-02-2011 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fritz88 (Post 8161835)
The Jizz over Barkley = Jizz over Clausen.

Bark = Claus

And RGIII= Vick, VY, Cunningham or any other running QB in the NFL (excluding amazingly enough people like Steve Young, Aaron Rodgers etc...).

I guess we should just go for broke and do whatever it takes to get Luck because apparently everyone else in this draft will suck. OR we could just go into camp next year with the winners we currently have at QB.

BossChief 12-02-2011 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 8162500)
Boss is going all Building 7 on us.

ROFL

Jet fuel doesnt burn hot enough to melt steel so there had to be some sort of bomb in there that actually took the building down /jesse ventura

BossChief 12-02-2011 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 8162504)
LMAO

So, you have nothing.

got it.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.