ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Stanzi: Every 2011 Preseason Snap (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=259406)

BigMeatballDave 05-11-2012 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8608982)
Was there a rule that prevented one member of a team from copying and giving a playbook to another member?

Who knows, but how would they even monitor that if there were such a rule?

Titty Meat 05-11-2012 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 8608989)
Its cute.

You trying to take on a Draftabulator persona...

That doesn't even make sense.

I see the Chiefs fans have found there "Ron Paul" if you will. A 5th round pick with no flaws.

I was simply pointing out most of those 3rd stringers and backups Stanzi was playing against didn't get their playbooks until the begining of camp some even joined camp late.

Coogs 05-11-2012 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8608982)
Was there a rule that prevented one member of a team from copying and giving a playbook to another member?

I really don't know on that nj. But for some reason it didn't appear to have happened... because many players did not get a playbook until the whole ordeal was over, so I assume there must have been something some sort of penalty involved in that sort of thing happening. And I don't recall if many rookies were allowed at the player controlled workouts or not. If so, you would have thought they would have had some sort of access to a playbook.

whoman69 05-11-2012 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8608982)
Was there a rule that prevented one member of a team from copying and giving a playbook to another member?

I think playbooks are handed in at the end of the season.

Titty Meat 05-11-2012 12:24 PM

BTW I see post like "all the draft experts loved Stanzi before the draft". That's not exactly true either.


http://ten.247sports.com/Article/Iow...in-draft-19226

Titty Meat 05-11-2012 12:24 PM

BTW I see post like "all the draft experts loved Stanzi before the draft". That's not exactly true either.


http://ten.247sports.com/Article/Iow...in-draft-19226

RealSNR 05-11-2012 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 8609008)
That doesn't even make sense.

I see the Chiefs fans have found there "Ron Paul" if you will. A 5th round pick with no flaws.

I was simply pointing out most of those 3rd stringers and backups Stanzi was playing against didn't get their playbooks until the begining of camp some even joined camp late.

The playbook excuse is being used to say that Stanzi looks like he has something to prove, and that the Chiefs should do a more thorough job investigating what he has than they did last offseason. Especially considering valuable snaps for him are being wasted on Matt Crappel.

I mean, it is what it is. It's an excuse. A good excuse, considering he played for a coach that ran ZERO up-tempo practices that cycled through the playbook until the night before the first preseason game. But still an excuse.

And yes, that extra week matters. The Bucs and Ravens were basically playing with one whole extra week of training camp out of the only 2 or 3 they could have possibly had at that point. And then you face those teams off against the Chiefs? Our offensive line had no ****ing clue what was going on, and it showed. And then you put Stanzi, who was equally unprepared behind those guys who have no ****ing clue what's going on, and presto! Shit sandwich!

Chiefnj2 05-11-2012 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whoman69 (Post 8609019)
I think playbooks are handed in at the end of the season.

Some players and some vets got their playbooks during the small stay.

mdchiefsfan 05-11-2012 12:45 PM

God! glad we drafted o-line depth.

Okie_Apparition 05-11-2012 01:41 PM

Quinn & Stanzi have the tools
all they have to do to beat out Cassel is not make alot of mistakes
shame on them if they don't

saphojunkie 05-11-2012 01:44 PM

Oh my god you guys are hilarious.

Who cares when he got his playbook? Who cares when he first arrived in Kansas City, or saw Arrowhead?

"He met Romeo on Tuesday but he didn't shake his hand until Friday, and he didn't meet Lilja AND Haley until 45 minutes AFTER his playbook was autographed by Brodie Croyle's wife! And D Bowe wasn't even there!!"

How about this? He was a rookie quarterback playing behind a god-awful collection of scrub backup tackles. None of this video gives us an accurate vision of who Stanzi is or could be as a quarterback. We will - sadly - just have to wait and see.

RealSNR 05-11-2012 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 8609191)
Oh my god you guys are hilarious.

Who cares when he got his playbook? Who cares when he first arrived in Kansas City, or saw Arrowhead?

"He met Romeo on Tuesday but he didn't shake his hand until Friday, and he didn't meet Lilja AND Haley until 45 minutes AFTER his playbook was autographed by Brodie Croyle's wife! And D Bowe wasn't even there!!"

How about this? He was a rookie quarterback playing behind a god-awful collection of scrub backup tackles. None of this video gives us an accurate vision of who Stanzi is or could be as a quarterback. We will - sadly - just have to wait and see.

Stanzi didn't practice any scrimmages that first week of training camp. If it's just him, that's fine. He should be able to overcome that. Rookies get signed late in training camp then play in the preseason games days later all the time.

In this case, not only did Stanzi not practice any scrimmages, but neither did the offensive line and his backs and receivers for that matter. And most of the guys he had on the field at the time had ZERO NFL experience.

So yes, that week did matter in evaluating some of his mistakes in those videos.

But like you said, it's a new season with a new coach who actually possesses a modicum of common sense. Stanzi's had a year of practices and he knows his teammates. Last year's tape can't tell us anything about how he'll do in the future other than we at least have seen examples where he played pretty damn well. He showed great feet, poise, felt the rush, and was able to deliver some pretty sexy well-timed strikes.

Reerun_KC 05-11-2012 01:54 PM

Can he "trick" safeties? Can we bring in a wiley vet to show him the ropes? /the CP Cliche group

Coogs 05-11-2012 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 8609191)
Oh my god you guys are hilarious.

Who cares when he got his playbook?

It has been reported that Stanzi was told before the season he was not going to play during the regular season. I think the two things go hand-in-hand. You saw the same thing with Mallett. Not sure if Mallett was told anything like Stanzi was, but both guys showed promise in the preseason. I just think both organizations did not want to rush them into anything. Hell, look at what happened to Palmer against the Chiefs when he had limited access to Oaklands playbook.

saphojunkie 05-11-2012 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 8609228)
It has been reported that Stanzi was told before the season he was not going to play during the regular season. I think the two things go hand-in-hand. You saw the same thing with Mallett. Not sure if Mallett was told anything like Stanzi was, but both guys showed promise in the preseason. I just think both organizations did not want to rush them into anything. Hell, look at what happened to Palmer against the Chiefs when he had limited access to Oaklands playbook.

No, I totally get that. It's just the arguing over when he received his playbook is just silly. The guy was clearly not prepared, and his offensive line kept us from accurately assessing his potential.

There's no point in arguing whether he should have been as prepared as Andy Dalton or Cam Newton. At least those dudes played behind starting OL.

I'm in no way ready to write off Stanzi, because I'd like to see what happens when Albert, Winston, and the other starters are blocking for him and he throws to Bowe and Baldwin, not terrence freaking copper.

007 05-11-2012 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 8609354)
No, I totally get that. It's just the arguing over when he received his playbook is just silly. The guy was clearly not prepared, and his offensive line kept us from accurately assessing his potential.

There's no point in arguing whether he should have been as prepared as Andy Dalton or Cam Newton. At least those dudes played behind starting OL.

I'm in no way ready to write off Stanzi, because I'd like to see what happens when Albert, Winston, and the other starters are blocking for him and he throws to Bowe and Baldwin, not terrence freaking copper.

That won't happen this preseason.

saphojunkie 05-11-2012 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 8609365)
That won't happen this preseason.

I'm sort of hoping it happens during the regular season. :thumb:

Three7s 05-11-2012 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 8608275)
Stanzi was a rookie then and Cassel is 29.

Dumbass.

More like I said my opinion which was something you didn't like and you cry about it. Boo hoo.

Pasta Little Brioni 05-11-2012 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 8609214)
Can he "trick" safeties? Can we bring in a wiley vet to show him the ropes? /the CP Cliche group

Couldn't hurt to try....Better than what we have...For the right price, why not?

Ace Gunner 05-11-2012 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 8609214)
Can he "trick" safeties? Can we bring in a wiley vet to show him the ropes? /the CP Cliche group


so right cause coaches don't know shit compared to ... /the CP Cliche group

RealSNR 05-11-2012 07:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 8609354)
I'm in no way ready to write off Stanzi, because I'd like to see what happens when Albert, Winston, and the other starters are blocking for him and he throws to Bowe and Baldwin, not terrence freaking copper.

You shut your whore mouth

rico 05-12-2012 10:48 AM

I don't know much about Cody Slate....what's the story on him?

milkman 05-12-2012 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buddha (Post 8608477)
Interesting that at least half of the posts in this thread involve the offensive line. And yet, all I heard prior to the draft was how irrelevant the offensive line is in "today's game." ROFL Anybody who thought that, wrote that or even entertained that idea is as dumb as dirt and should be castrated immediately.

Stanzi may end up being a terrific QB, but who will ever know if he's running for his f'ing life?

Yes, we'd all love to have an Andrew Luck on our roster, but that's not how the real world works. KC's best play right now is to develop what we have at QB, protect the shit out of them, and get the ground game going. With the defense we should have, that should be enough to get us to the playoffs.

Everyone of us that have argued with dumbasses like you have all wanted to draft O-Lineman over the last several years.

But the idea that you need the best O-Line to win is stupid, and that has been proven again and agian through the years by teams like the Pack and the Steelers, not to mention the Giants just this last SB.

We don't need a ****ing #11 overall guard to build a good O-Line.

We need to build a good O-Line to give whoever is our QB the best opportunity, but the fact remains, your argument is the argument of a ****ing idiot.

Go dip a catbrush in Sandy Alomar piss and **** yourself with it.

rico 07-12-2012 03:46 PM

Yes, I know this was a game where he made one of if not THE biggest blunder of his college football career, BUT on the flippity-flip, GOD DAMN he made a nice throw (and other nice throws) at the 1:30 mark.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/lFN0VVnPKzw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

BigRichard 07-12-2012 03:57 PM

Ban this muther bumper

rico 07-12-2012 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRichard (Post 8735661)
Ban this muther bumper

Mmmmkkkk.... I'm assuming you weren't as impressed as I by the throw or didn't like the decision making at the end or you were coiled up and waiting for the perfect opportunity to show your cunning wit by referring to someone as a "muther bumper" or you don't like old threads being bumped....? This muther stumper has me stumped...

RealSNR 07-12-2012 04:19 PM

A college kid ****ed up time management?

He'll never be a great QB. If you haven't learned time management in the 4th quarter by the time you're in middle school, you can't be an NFL QB.

rico 07-12-2012 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 8735709)
A college kid ****ed up time management?

He'll never be a great QB. If you haven't learned time management in the 4th quarter by the time you're in middle school, you can't be an NFL QB.

I honestly didn't post that video to knock Stanzi. I am a Stanzi fan. I understand how it appears that I posted with those intentions, but swear I just randomly viewed the clip and that throw at the 1:30 mark caught my eye. That was a bomb.

RealSNR 07-12-2012 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ricoswaff (Post 8735723)
I honestly didn't post that video to knock Stanzi. I am a Stanzi fan. I understand how it appears that I posted with those intentions, but swear I just randomly viewed the clip and that throw at the 1:30 mark caught my eye. That was a bomb.

Yeah, I know. It's mostly directed at all the haters, specifically the ones from BossChief's "Ricky Stanzi in the 2nd round" thread. They ripped into the Ricky hard for that mistake. It's pretty much all they have to tee off on the guy.

Oh, and HES A 5TH ROUNDER OH NOES! That too.

BossChief 07-12-2012 04:33 PM

He is the quarterback this team has been looking for for a very long time.

"The Chosen One!"

DeezNutz 07-12-2012 04:34 PM

He has the ability to flash great presence in the pocket. No question.

rico 07-12-2012 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 8735729)
Yeah, I know. It's mostly directed at all the haters, specifically the ones from BossChief's "Ricky Stanzi in the 2nd round" thread. They ripped into the Ricky hard for that mistake. It's pretty much all they have to tee off on the guy.

Oh, and HES A 5TH ROUNDER OH NOES! That too.

I remember reading that thread about a year or so after it had been posted. Boss had been wishing for the Chiefs to draft Stanzi long before it actually happened and there were mega-haters in that thread...some who have warmed up to Stanzi a bit since.

RealSNR 07-12-2012 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ricoswaff (Post 8735752)
I remember reading that thread about a year or so after it had been posted. Boss had been wishing for the Chiefs to draft Stanzi long before it actually happened and there were mega-haters in that thread...some who have warmed up to Stanzi a bit since.

Hell, I was one of them. I was guilty of basing my projection of Stanzi into the NFL from his sophomore year, where he won a bunch of games but made bone-headed mistakes. Then I saw statistics from his senior season. Then I saw the steady growth and giant steps he took to become a very mature QB. I watched college film from his junior and senior seasons, and I changed my mind about the guy. It ended up being a complete 180 that I took.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.