Hindsight is always 50/50

Amirite?

Facts are facts.

We are not facing 5 UFL QBs this year.

I am getting really tired of restating that fact.

:facepalm:

Present a reasoned, logical argument that shows our schedule this year is easier.

Or stuff your smiley up your ass.

You're being generous. The offense was lousy against Oakland the first game. Despite 6 turnovers, the offense scored 14 points. The 2nd Oakland game we moved the ball but couldn't score in the redzone. Turnovers killed us. So the offense playing well in only 25% of our games, or even using your figure 37.5%, is not a red flag. We had other games where it was a total abortion or we had empty yards.

All of those qbs played DUE TO INJURY.

To act like last years schedule (at this point last year) was easier than this years schedule is fools gold.

Most here thought, at this point of the year, winning 7 or 8 games last year would be a good year if we were at full strength.

This year, from what I've gathered, seems to have genuine expectations of 9 or 10 wins.

You know why that is?

Because the schedule is easier.

Or at least the perception of the schedule difficulty is.

For all we know, more qbs get injured this year.

I am saying that it is a 4th place schedule compared to denver's 1st place one.

This is why women shouldn't write about sports.

The big fish in the little bowl
will flop to the ground & dry out
~how much did you pay Hootie

I can usually figure out what you're talking about.

You lost me on this one.

Manning will be the new Denver "stink"
dead fishy
~this part was private

You little riddle filled bastard.

IF (and that's one big ****ing IF) Manning's healthy, they should be

I'm serious... name a team that, minus the QB, has better personnel on offense.

..and, yes, I am aware that QB is the most important position on the team; I still want to know if another team has better offensive personnel than the Chiefs.

I never know what he's talking about.

It's going to hurt big time to watch this team excel, minus the most important position in the game....

QBs not included I'd consider taking the Giants, Eagles, Falcons and Texans.

QBs included I'd take just about any other offense in the league.

Giants: not nearly as good at RB or TE

Eagles: have WRs to rival Chiefs. Not as good on O-Line or at TE. Charles & Hillis have edge over McCoy & whoever

Falcons: not as good at WR, RB, TE, or O-Line

Texans: better RBs, not as deep at WR, not as good at TE (Daniels is just as injury prone as Moeaki if you're going to argue that), not as good across O-Line.

**Edit** I like the offensive talent in Dallas.. maybe Philadelphia. I still take KC, though.

pretty sure the Broncos won the division last year and a playoff game, all with a QB who had a 47% competion percentage. Go figure.

I bet both KC and Denver start off slow but that the last game of the year will be for the division.

Stanzi and Brock are the quarterbacks by then.

who names their kid Brock anyway?

hey, that's it. Brock Osweilers new moniker: Kid Brock.

I think you're being a bit of a homer. We are very talented, but so are other teams. We're also sporting a lot of question marks and potential. Not including health issues, who knows if Hillis and Baldwin will pan out? Not to mention Moeaki. He had a pretty good rookie season, but he's spent so much time off the field, we have no clue whether not he'll acclimate himself. Hell, even Hudson and Asamoah have only seen limited game time.

If everything went as well as it could, yes, I'd take the Chiefs over most other teams. But as of now, question marks and all, I'd still consider all the teams I mentioned and probably add Dallas, Atlanta, and maybe even Detroit.

That doesn't matter, though.

The facts:

1. We played an easy schedule last year.

2. Right now, barring an unforeseen rash of starting quarterback injuries to 1/3 of our schedule, we play a much tougher schedule.

Facts. Cannot be argued.

If you can sit here and tell me we'll play 1/3 of our schedule this year against complete shit QBs, I'll tell you we're winning 10 games.

if this team can just get a good qb...

Your second point is not a fact, it is an assumption. Your second point assumes that every team on the Chiefs schedule is going to live up to their performance over the previous year.

Remember last year? Everyone, including you and I, were saying OH NOES, THE CHIEFS HAVE THE TOUFEST SCHEDULE IN THE NFL, AAAAHHH!!! And now, using your words, apparently the Chiefs played an "easy" schedule.

Assumptions. Can be argued.

It is not an assumption.

Games against good teams with good quarterbacks are always difficult for our team led by Matt Cassel.

our leak-link should be a little better . with our running game improved the Oline better and hopefully romeo has the D clicking .. we should contend .....

Easy there big shooter....

We wouldnt even need an elite quarterback to win a superbowl with this team.

If we had a jay cutler/ matt ryan/ matt shaub type we could win championships.

Definitely, minus the QB KC's roster reminds me alot of the 1995 49ers or the 2003 Patriots.

Pretty numbers and he did help carry that team, but some costly turnovers at very bad times stand out in people's minds.

:facepalm: Not this "tough schedule" bullshit again. Every year there is normally 5 or 6 new playoff teams from the year before. JFC this shit gets old.

It's not bullshit.

We are the ****ing Kansas City Chiefs.

Any game against a team with a good QB is a tough game for us.

This schedule is definitely difficult, barring a gift of injuries from the football gods.

No, games with teams who have good defenses are always difficult for gentle matt.

That too.

So you're saying Matt Cassel is the problem!?

Uhm, yah.

ya, I think those are pretty good QB's also. The other problem with the passing offense is at #1 WR also -- I know many Chiefs fans won't except the fact that Bowe has been as much a part of the problem as anyone, he had two impressive games during his five years in the NFL -- the Seattle game where he was getting wide open all game and then the Tennessee game at the end of that season, 2010. That's a problem for this team too. The OL has been horrible since 2007, but has improved a bit.

Really, all this offense has been since LJ douchbagger got canned is Jamaal Charles. Charles pitched left, Charles up the middle, Charles pitched right. Charles, Charles, Charles. Hell, he had 97 of the team's 161 total offense yards during the playoff game. The one where Dwayne Bowe had zero stats. Nothing. In a playoff game. That is bad for a 4th year #1 wideout. Unacceptable imo.

You mean the game where dipshit Cassel didn't even try once to throw to Bowe, even when Bowe was wide open. But yeah keep blaming Bowe for that like the little douche you are.

You should stop, because you are embarrassing yourself.

Troll is back again eh?

Bowe is one of the few KC studs that isn't broken.
WTF?

The problem is, you have no clue :D

Eat shit.

He is a stud, but he is a very broken human. I know you don't see it that way, but I do. He's a big loser.

Aw, you mad bro :D

Let's return to bashing the flawed team from Pile High shall we?

Much better that than look at your own team, I'm sure.

Loser? LMAO

You're a moron.

How is he a loser?

I'm not mad, I'm perplexed by your dumbassery.

It is? Since when? We can bash Cassel, that's about it.

Do you really think that:

falcons
saints (missing coach and players)
ravens
bucs
bengals
panthers
browns

is more difficult than 2011:

lions
vikings
dolphins
patriouts
bears
jets
packers

???

This years schedule is much easier...not to mention that we had a few injuries last year.

I've bolded the ones that will be significant challenges for our Chiefs.

The fact that you think games against:

vikings
dolphins
jets
bears

Are difficult, is laughable.

Those were games against Donovan McNabb's corpse, Matt Moore, Mark Sanchez and ****ing Caleb Hanie.

Gochefs, do you happen to have a gif of Bowe running wide open in that game?

hahaha first thread i read....... all i can say is hahahahahah

Hey look, another win for me. ROFL

ROFL

Gotta tell you, you were dead on right.

You guys signed the one man gang...Grats. Must have eaten a shit ton of stem cells in the offseason to boot.

have you seen the Broncos defense lately?

Yeah, I saw them against the Pats, Falcs, and Texans getting raped. Pretty good against fraud teams though. Don't play them folk in the postseason.

Simmons predicted like 41-0, Walter Football like 31-0...someone else like 31-3...

Vegas must know something we don't.

:rolleyes:

fact is the Broncos still were in those games and due to things like turnovers (Manning threw 3 picks in the atlanta game) the Broncos didn't win. Those games were also early in the season when the Broncos were still gelling.

but whatever, your gonna see things your way and I'm gonna know things the winning way.

Look at how Romeo has schemed against Peyton the last 5 or 6 times he has faced him...even with subpar teams. They also saw how KC played against Pittsburgh.

I think they are dead wrong, though.

I am throwing out some cash to back that, too.

clevelandbronco....... u in cleveland, OH?

I feel stupid...oh so stupid...I feel Stupid and reeruned and GAAAAAY!!!

If for some reason the Chiefs play out of their ass and keep the game close would anyone be surprised?

Do we have a 3rd QB active for the game?

I would really like to see the Chiefs get the #1 draft (with a new GM) but I'd also like to see them kick dirt in the face of Manning. Maybe even get DJ or Tamba get in a couple of Suh shots on Manning.

Looking back to reality I doubt Manning will be playing if they get ahead 4 TD's.

Ha I think I nailed it, only but we still would have sucked with Quinn so there is that.