Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I agree with you though. The "M" was much better. Why leave something behind when you think you're the best? |
Quote:
|
Meh. We played them tit for tat for a while then Jones realized he was an all american and butt ****ed us
|
SEC!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
Five star slam! Congrats! |
Georgia was so frusterating to watch last night. They really played terribly. The fact is that they ran the spread for whatever reason and they should have played "old man football."
Mizzou played a pretty good game. I think the difference was quality depth. Georgia had to start five freshmen because of the suspensions and Mizzou ran out of depth in the 4the quarter. Mizzou is close to being really good. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Those turnovers were caused by Jarvis Jones being awesome. In no way am I suggesting that Georgia didn't beat Missouri. Georgia took control of that game, for sure. But it wasn't an expected SEC situation where the depth (or lack of depth) of each team becomes apparent as one team pulls away in the 4th quarter. This was different: in this game a special defensive player single-handidly took over a game. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Posted via Mobile Device |
There's nothing wrong with Old Man Football. I don't think the problem with Big 10 football is the style of football, it's their passive style of recruiting that short-changes them on talent. It's an old man's "gentlemen's agreement" league.
If Mizzou thinks "old man football" is a bad thing, they're in for a rude awakening. Lots of teams that play terrific defense and will back that defense up with a running game that runs it down your throat with good downhill running and an offensive line that will overpower you. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
That it would have most likely been worse
Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I don't believe mu is going to have a good line, never did. Even without the injuries. They hung in there but I disagree about the depth issues. When a team pulls away in the last ten minutes it's usually about depth and condition. Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
But that wasn't the case last night. That depth disparity might have resulted in Georgia pulling away in normal circumstances, but we didn't get normal circumstances. Those MU turnovers had very little to do with depth and conditioning. |
Georgia were hitting hard yesterday as well. Mizzou has to bring more of a physical game.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
UGA sucked for 2.5 quarters. I could say it was because Murray sucked, and he did, but there's a reason for that. All the adjustments the D was making, and the way they were playing affected him. Big time. When Georgia finally figured Mizzou out they punched them in the mouth and kicked their ass all over the field. Mizzou didn't lose that game on their own mistakes, they got their asses kicked. It happens, welcome to the SEC. And so you know, every team gets their ass kicked at some point in the season in the SEC. Every one except for the one that will win the national title each year. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
It happens. Get over it. I've watched my team ranked #1 have Alabama come in and beat the shit of us, watched a horrendous Tennessee team beat the shit out of us, and watched us start 0-2 and end up in the SEC title game. (and get our ass kicked in the 2nd half and lose the same way you did yesterday) The SEC is a different league than the Big 12. It's not about outscoring the other team, or out finessing them. It's about wearing them down, dismantling them, and then destroying them. It's a theme you'll see all season long. |
Quote:
Georgia is better than Missouri and nearly every position on the field, and that was always most likely going to show in the final score. The only reason UGA was three touchdowns better last night was because of Jarvis Jones' playmaking ability. Yes, he pretty much is the only reason that the score got so out of hand. Not the only reason that UGA was able to stop Missouri's offense from doing much of anything, but the reason that the UGA lead increased to what it did. Which is all I've been saying, but you're being weirdly defensive for some reason. You should really appreciate Jones this season. He's special. And me recognizing that a special player took over a game in a special way does not diminish the team effort of the team that player plays for. |
At least both of these teams play football, which is more than I can say for my alma mater. :Lin:
|
Yeah, that ARK game was bad...
|
Quote:
And I don't even want to talk about the defense. Our program just stepped back about a decade with this debacle. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
That's the nature of the beast. Every other game is like a bowl game this first year in the SEC. They are all out to teach Mizzou a lesson and put them in their place.
Mizzou will be fine, but it will take a little "Acclimation". |
Quote:
|
ROFL Mizzou fans still delusional as shit. I can't stop laughing at this stupidity. Yall will get yalls shit kicked in this year and then I better not hear anymore of these embarrassing excuses.
|
Quote:
That's why I say to keep your head up. Everybody gets a good ass whipping or two each year in the SEC. |
Quote:
Posted via Mobile Device |
Setsuna is the SEC Wickedson.
|
Quote:
To be stamped with that...........:eek: |
Quote:
Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
|
ROFL. To be this delusional about an ass kicking loss to UGA is laughable. Yall haven't even won shit in any sport to be this stupid. Wickedson is a compliment. Yall are straight up reeruned.
|
I love how Richardson spent the entire night getting piss-pounded after running his mouth.
Richardson has been a catastrophic bust for Mizzou. From #1 prospect in the country and the most heralded defensive recruit in decades to a backup rotational tackle that has simply never been good enough to force himself into the starting lineup. Thanks again, Shel... |
Quote:
Apparently, when you say that Mizzou got their asses kicked it means Mizzou got their asses kicked. But when I say Mizzou got their asses kicked, it means I am making delusional, reeruned excuses for Mizzou. Setsuna, you have the reading comprehension skills of a defensive tackle recruit from a Memphis high school. |
No offense, but I disagree with those saying that depth wasn't really an issue. From what I saw, it was absolutely an issue. We lost our best lineman from what was already a patchwork OL, and probably our best LB and we just wore down. I was proud of our defense. They played their hearts out, but when your offense keeps giving the other team short fields (to put it mildly), you're going to wear down.
The second biggest factor, IMO, was offensive play calling. Wildcat on the first play of a game? Really? REPEATEDLY running the QB up the gut? A fake punt on 4th and 11 from our own 30? And Jarvis Jones...geez, what can you say about him? It will take a few years to recruit the kind of depth we need to compete at the top level of the SEC. We have the depth at receiver, and maybe QB, but really nowhere else. |
The "old man football" chats were pretty funny...
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:00 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.