The time off didn't exactly help.

Pick up Donald Jones this week for your Fantasy team gonna make Reeves look like a clown

:clap:

I think you know pretty much what they know, he has a heel bruise that won't heal. (Pun intended).

Exactly. There's always ways to get around the cap.

haha

haha

HAHA

HAHA

MUHAHAHAHAHAHA






















j/k :evil:

Flowers gets hurt alot. They probably should have planned better. That said, Brown is alright imo. Hopefully, he will be able to go. He hasn't started a real game yet so don't give me the preseason BS...

Hindsight is 20/20 but, I think Pioli resigned the lesser corner of the two. Carr has never missed a game. I like Flowers but he can't stay healthy.

I would also like to point out that there aren't any corners out there and Reeves might be better than what's left. The Falcons signed the Colt's nickelback from last year off the street. Now that's really bad...

Not sure who said it did.

Will Stevie Johnson's family be able to recognize him after Berry & Co go all Tony Soprano on him? It's not revenge they're after, it's a Reckoning.

Missed that. Definitely not worthless, but to me it isn't money well spent. Good players against the run though.

Ty Warren and Richard Seymour got plenty of sacks in the same scheme.

The problem with both Jackson and Dorsey is that they aren't on the field in passing situations because their skill set isn't adequate enough for them to be.

Overpaid for sure.

This place gone full idiot though. Every single thing is a dumpster fire.

Yep. This has less to do with scheme and more to do with skill set.

god damn you are a whiny ****ing bitch.

does limited mean out now?

Yep, it's gone full Claytard.

You've been here long enough. This place is ALWAYS a dumpster fire when things look bad.

And to think...you, me and O.City used to be nice guys almost all the time.

It's caused Jason and I to lose our mind and post about midgets all the time

Maybe Seymour and Warren got most of their sacks because they played beside two of the greatest 3-4 NTs of all time in Vince Wilfork and Ted Washington?

Seymour played DT in the 3-4 in his first two years in the NFL. He got 3 sacks as a rookie and 5 sacks in his second year.

He never recorded eight sacks in a season until he had a really good NT. He got eight once with Washington and once with Wilfork.

Warren never had more than 3.5 sacks until they got Wilfork.

The problem isn't Dorsey and Jackson imo. The problem has been the personnel at NT. Dorsey and Jackson aren't going to get a bunch (5+) of sacks unless we have a dominant NT. Having a dominant NT is the key to this defense.

So he could have taken the time off to become a Buddhist ****ing monk, it doesn't mean he sucks any less.

about those midgets...

Egg zactly.

I think the reason they aren't playing Daniels at CB is because Lewis is out. I mean Elam is good enough and there probably isn't much difference between him and Daniels at FS. The thing is that a big part of their defense will rely on that 3-3-5 three safety formation that allows Berry to either line up at CB or as a hybrid LB. We use this formation quite a bit against good TEs and it's the way we have shut down Gates since Romeo came to KC. When Berry went out last year, it severly hampered RACs ability to use this formation. Berry has talked about it a little bit in an interview.

That's why this year he moved Daniels, one of his most reliable players, to safety this year. He wants to be able to run this formation no matter whcih three safeties he has.

In the end, I think the only way we see Daniels at CB is if Lewis comes back soon.

In my opinion.

No worked out 4 LB's Tues including Ernie Sims.

Tampa Bay hosted 7 defensive players including Everette Brown.

Houston worked out 7 DL including Remi Ayodele

Detroit worked out 9 DB's including ex skin Byron Westbrook (brother of Brian)

Pats worked out 9, Cris Carr and Curtis Painter among them.


Haven't heard about the Chiefs yet, but I am sure they are looking

Is that why you post about midgets? And here I was reading it through a Freudian lens.

And they are cheap because they didn't sign a min. salary corner. Priceless.

Are we really any better off weak at Corner (with Reeves) or at Safety with someone like Hartman?
I guess with Reeves if you're trying to keep everything in front of you.

By pff right? Who figures pff's stats? Are they better than Bleacher report? Or, are they only better because you have to pay? Aren't they taken by another dumbass sitting on the coach like you and me? Just like Bleacher Report? They aren't official stats but, they are good enough right mouth fingerer? What makes them experts?

I like their work too but, the lesson here is not to act like your bullshit stats are any better than my bullshit stats.

mental midgets

No, we ****ing do not run a god damn, mother ****ing 3-3-5. Jesus, do you ****ing watch the games? We run a 2-3-6. Poe and Bailey are typically our down lineman, with Tamba and Houston lined up outside both of them. Dj is lined up as the Mike, and Berry next to him, usually covering TEs. We then have 2 safeties deep, and 3 corners, which when healthy are Routt, Flowers and Arenas, who plays inside. Here is an article detailing how we run our 2-3-6 on >30% of our snaps. Oh, and it isn't from some stupid ****ing website like Bleacher Report either, dumbass.

https://www.profootballfocus.com/blo...%80%93-part-1/

In fact, here is an image for you so you can get remember it easier. God ****ing dammit dude, I'm sick of explaining the same ****ing shit over and over again.

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-dIPo5JT23C...rt+--+dime.PNG

lol, you like their work but it doesnt fit your agenda?

No, she was being a bitch in another thread and she had it coming. I have actually used that same article many times in the last few months.

Says the dumbass who doesn't know any of the ****ing defensive formations the Kansas CIty Chiefs run. You're a ****ing moron BlackBob.

You're wrong and you aren't very bright. We use both.

Remember lady, the problems that you suffer from are the problems that you make.

There's a million guys better than reeves.

Florence
Chris Johnson
Joselio Hanson

I would have even rolled the dice on demarcus van dyke.

Oh yeah while pioli was wasting 7th round picks this year there was a guy by the name of Alfonzo Dennard he could have picked.

i will just go by who is wrong on a regular basis...

Sorter's a chick? I thought the avatar was just some picture from something internety and pop culturey that I didn't know

Yea, but its even worse than usual. This place is basically Claytard Planet right now.

There are multiple people openly hoping for the team to lose just so that they can be correct. That bugs the **** out of me.

i was wondering that myself.

Did you even read the link I posted? Do you watch the games? We have never even ran a 3-3-5. Period.

If those guys could play, Dimitrov wouldn't have just signed Terrence Johnson.

DJ wasn't drafted by Pioli
and this list isn't very impressive at all for 4 years.

going into year four, the team should be a contender with this many high draft choices.

might be his own nickname for sorter too...

This :banghead:

No problem. It will work itself out. I'm just tired of her mouth.

We run a form of the 3-3-5 every game honey. Just stick with the grammer corrections.

Post some threads about hippo poop helicopters. It's really relaxing. Calms you down instantly.

BlackBob. I don't know how else I can make this clear to you, other than scheduling a ****ing interview with Crennel and having him explain to you that we have NEVER ****ING RAN A 3-3-5. We run a 2-3-6. FFS, I posted pictures, statistics from a renowned website when it comes to football statistics and you still don't get it. You're either a wonderful troll, or severely mentally handicapped. Judging from your spelling, grammatical use, and stupid ****ing ideas like "Brandon Siler is a better tackler than DJ" and "McCluster is quicker than Charles" in the past, I'm starting to believe it is the latter.

Alright. Post some evidence. Go.

Ok but, you have to ask me nicely.

For the future, understand that we run a 3-3-5 more than we run a 2-3-6.

We don't. Try reading, or is your fetal-alcohol syndrome too severe?

If you really wanted to shut me up, you could just prove me wrong and show that we run the 3-3-5 more than the 2-3-6 (which is Romeo's baby, idiot) with things like, evidence.

I can't disagree with that

Stop stalling and post your evidence.

He can't. He's just trolling.

Not until she asks nicely. Some people here are so mean. I am still waiting for pest to ask nicely and I have his link ready too.

grammer
mmer
mer
er
e

:banghead:

you forgot the r

Pkg 3-4-4 4-3-4 5-2-4 2-4-5 3-3-5 4-2-5 1-4-6 2-3-6 3-2-6 4-1-6 1-3-7 Other
KC 55% 0% 0% 9% 0% 0% 1% 32% 0% 0% 1% 3%

Here is what I posted in the link for everyone to see. According to PFF, we ran the 3-3-5 in 2011 0 times. That's right, 0% of our snaps were in that formation. However, we ran the 2-3-6 in 32% of our snaps.

Here's the link again for those who missed it.
https://www.profootballfocus.com/blo...%80%93-part-1/

And that's where I am setting you up to prove that pff isn't always right. Ask me nicely and I'll take you to school bitch. I am way ahead of you.

BINGO! Add Cassel to the list and it looks even less impressive.

I know Brown was a bust but I have hard time believing he wouldn't be better than Studebaker based on raw talent alone.

You know what's really funny about this? Even if it was right (which it isn't), here's my post that spurred this discussion...

Jesus. This is what the 3-3-5 looks like http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi..._green.svg.png

Notice how that looks nothing like what we put on the field? This is what we put on the field

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-dIPo5JT23C...rt+--+dime.PNG

Quote: I think the reason they aren't playing Daniels at CB is because Lewis is out. I mean Elam is good enough and there probably isn't much difference between him and Daniels at FS. The thing is that a big part of their defense will rely on that 3-3-5 three safety formation that allows Berry to either line up at CB or as a hybrid LB. We use this formation quite a bit against good TEs and it's the way we have shut down Gates since Romeo came to KC. When Berry went out last year, it severly hampered RACs ability to use this formation. Berry has talked about it a little bit in an interview.

That's why this year he moved Daniels, one of his most reliable players, to safety this year. He wants to be able to run this formation no matter whcih three safeties he has.

In the end, I think the only way we see Daniels at CB is if Lewis comes back soon.

In my opinion.



You're literally right about this post minus the fact we don't run a 3-3-5. He likes to have another safety up in the box instead of having 3 down lineman, because of the coverage abilities Safeties typically bring.

Which is why we have 2 down lineman, 3 LBs (because Belcher can't cover) and 6 DBs. 3 safeties, and 3 corners.

You can see us in this package at the :12 and 1:58 mark in this video. No 3-3-5 though

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-h...efs-highlights

**** it, sit him this week and let him rest for the Saints game.

I believe his point was that Routt is going to be thrown at less often with a weaker corner on the other side.

yep
any smart QB should take advantage of that situation.

If so, it must be that time of the month.

He certainly did, it almost looked easy for Ryan.

Check the :43 second mark. Julio gets the pick play TD on a 3-3-5 defense. The Chiefs base nickel pack is a 3-3-5 defense. That's where pff goes wrong. Occassionally KC uses a 4 down linemen nickel formation but not very often.

There's the 3-3-5 nickel which is where you bring in an extra corner. Then, there's the 3-3-5 star where you bring in a third safety. Pff isn't including the 3-3-5 nickel in their 3-3-5 stats on your link.

In the star formation, the "star" player is a LB/S tweener who plays up torwards the line. This role is meant for Berry but McGraw mostly played it in Berry's rookie season. The plan was for Berry to play it last year and now he's playing it this year at times.


Consider that we played in the nickel 50% of the snaps last year. Some people even argue that the 3-3-5 nickel is our base formation.

If you go back and look at the Green bay game from last year, we lined up in the nickel 86% of the snaps in that game. You will see the 3-3-5 quite a bit.

Last, whoever said Dorsey doesn't line up in the nickel is dead wrong. The only DE that comes out is Jackson..... In the past anyway.

exactly.
that's why Pioli made a mistake by letting Carr get out.
we could've had Carr/Routt last sunday.
i know it would have been an expensive secondary but hey, it would have been worth it.

I don't know. I see 2 linemen, 4 LB (99, across from the LG, is Jones, a LB) and 3 db (with 2 db off of the screen).

http://i45.tinypic.com/2im4207.jpg

I'm glad people are finally seeing this shit-dick regime for what it is.

My eyes have been wide ****ing open for months.

:popcorn:

People are realizing what's up.

The curtain is being thrown back on this failed regime, and ghastly inept management is the show.

Pioli's in the spotlight, ****ing a chicken, and people are about to stop paying for it.

In case you weren't aware, they couldn't do it even if they were asked to.

How long does a partially torn ligament take to heal?

Routt was only thrown at 4 times because they were too busy raping Reeves and DJ. He still gave up 3 catches.

Go back and look at the tape and you will see Routt letting Roddy White run wide the **** open on Julio's first TD.

His fail is coming. Shit, his idea of "good coverage" is just to rape the receiver with contact.

You are an idiot. Nothing is going to change any time soon. For one this team will win enough games Pioli will keep his job.

You rooting for the Chiefs to fail to prove your point is like hoping the US economy will totally collapse so we will elect a better president.

Problem is there is no reason to believe we will make the change to better leadership so all you are doing is rooting for failure.

Time to start rooting for success and quiet being a douche nozzle.

Douche nozzle.

Do you even realize that I was TOO optimistic before last Sunday? I thought we'd lose by TEN.

This regime is ultra fail.