ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Who would you want as our next HC: Billick, Cowher or Gruden? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=264570)

BigMeatballDave 10-02-2012 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaWolf (Post 8971321)
has developed a franchise QB, .

He has nothing, NOTHING to do with developing Ben.

Nothing.

htismaqe 10-02-2012 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whoman69 (Post 8971296)
Lightning does not strike twice.

This.

DaneMcCloud 10-02-2012 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 8971301)
Helped Cam Newton, who nearly everyone and their mother thought was going to have a horrible rookie season have a wonderful season that revitalized Steve Smith's career.

I attribute Cam's season last year to Warren Moon, not Chud. Furthermore, Newton has definitely taken a step backward this year (which isn't surprising).

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 8971301)
Plenty of head coaches aren't selected because they are necessarily "worthy". Philbin wasn't "worthy". He didn't even call plays. However, he seems like a quality head coach in the making.

Philbin's 51 years old. He's spent 28 years coaching, most of the past decade in Green Bay, one of the most successful franchises in the league.

Chud has about half that experience and his only stops as OC's have been average at best. I just don't see anything about his resume that screams "Head Coach".

He'd be better of going back to Miami or some other high level college program, thus proving he's worthy of a gig.

DaneMcCloud 10-02-2012 05:01 PM

Why would anyone advocate hiring a guy that hasn't coached in five years or more?

BigMeatballDave 10-02-2012 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 8971365)
Why would anyone advocate hiring a guy that hasn't coached in five years or more?

And there's another strike against these guys.

chiefzilla1501 10-02-2012 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefspants (Post 8970996)
While I agree that the hate for Trent is ridiculous, I've just seen zero evidence that a super bowl winning retread possesses the full commitment to take a new team to the promise land.

This is how I feel too.

Hire a good GM. Hire a head coach under that GM that's not going to be so powerful that he wants supreme control over personnel decisions.

I think young guys have a hell of a lot more fire and there are a lot of real good ones who can run a quality team if you give them the chance.

For example, a Jay Gruden. Or Mike Miller of Arizona (has a very nice resume). Hell, a few guys on the 49ers staff -- love that team, because they are so technically proficient. Fangio or what about John Morton (kind of like this guy. Seems like a real fiery guy)?

I just don't want to get stuck on stale candidates that get discussed every year. Go for an up and comer.

Dave Lane 10-02-2012 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 8970505)
Because he would restore the brand of football that defines KC.

Mediocre but steady?

PRIEST 10-02-2012 05:20 PM

Out of the list Gruden .

chiefzilla1501 10-02-2012 05:34 PM

Here you go. Here's a guy with some fire and he's coaching one hell of a defense in Seattle right now. Watch Gus Bradley's tirade in the middle.

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/ofv2MgMoFG8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

JoeyChuckles 10-02-2012 07:18 PM

Football is currently in an offense first style. This replaced the defense first style of the early 2000's. Therefore, we need an offense first coach.

Rausch 10-02-2012 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoeyChuckles (Post 8971670)
Football is currently in an offense first style. This replaced the defense first style of the early 2000's. Therefore, we need an offense first coach.

Keep chasing that dragon!

Dayze 10-02-2012 07:20 PM

I wouldn't mind having us one of them attacking style coaches, instead of playing not to lose. I think that would be neat

chiefzilla1501 10-02-2012 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoeyChuckles (Post 8971670)
Football is currently in an offense first style. This replaced the defense first style of the early 2000's. Therefore, we need an offense first coach.

Having a defensive first defense doesn't keep you from hiring an offensive coordinator with firepower. The key is that you have a head coach who gets his players to play with fire and discipline.

chiefzilla1501 10-02-2012 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoeyChuckles (Post 8971670)
Football is currently in an offense first style. This replaced the defense first style of the early 2000's. Therefore, we need an offense first coach.

Here's the other key point...
I want to aggressively go after a QB. I want an aggressive offense.

But here's the reality. We exaggerate the criticalness of an elite offense in the modern NFL. The fact is, what's critical is that you luck into getting an elite Quarterback.

But you can't build your team around the gamble that you get an elite QB. If you don't have an elite QB, it doesn't hurt to have a defensive minded head coach.

Three7s 10-02-2012 07:36 PM

I'd go all-in for Cowher. The reason for me is simple. In my opinion, the Chiefs had their best defenses in the early 90s with him as our DC, including getting the best out of Derrick Thomas. Ever wonder what he could do with Hali and Houston? That entices me greatly.

One thing that would be a guarantee with Cowher is that the team would NEVER be soft, which is almost a guarantee with Crennel.

DaneMcCloud 10-02-2012 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Three7s (Post 8971716)
I'd go all-in for Cowher. The reason for me is simple. In my opinion, the Chiefs had their best defenses in the early 90s with him as our DC, including getting the best out of Derrick Thomas. Ever wonder what he could do with Hali and Houston? That entices me greatly.

One thing that would be a guarantee with Cowher is that the team would NEVER be soft, which is almost a guarantee with Crennel.

Cowher didn't coordinate any defense in Pittsburgh

Titty Meat 10-02-2012 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 8971283)
What has Chud ever done that makes him worthy of a head coaching position?

He's been a successful offensive coordinator and position coach in both college and the pros.

He's the only one who's made the Cleveland offense the last 10 years worth a shit. The year before Chud took over in Carolina that offense was one of the worst. When he took over it was a top 10.

DaneMcCloud 10-02-2012 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 8971917)
He's been a successful offensive coordinator and position coach in both college and the pros.

He's the only one who's made the Cleveland offense the last 10 years worth a shit. The year before Chud took over in Carolina that offense was one of the worst. When he took over it was a top 10.

I'm sorry, I disagree. He coordinated Miami's offense for a few years - where are the great players from that era? Where's the QB? And while he had nice year with Cleveland, it was one year.

IMO, the guy is LUCKY he gets to work with Cam Newton and should be grateful that he worked with Ron Rivera in San Diego. Otherwise, the dude would be a position coach.

Hoover 10-02-2012 08:47 PM

We need a HC who can develop a QB, its that simple.

DaneMcCloud 10-02-2012 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover (Post 8971952)
We need a HC who can develop a QB, its that simple.

No.

The Chiefs need an offensive minded head coach that will PLAY a rookie QB from Day One.

They need an offensive coordinator that will game plan around the rookie QB's strengths and hide his weaknesses as much as possible.

And they need a strong, experienced QB coach.

Psyko Tek 10-02-2012 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 8970505)
Because he would restore the brand of football that defines KC.

well fucxk just get marty back

Psyko Tek 10-02-2012 10:07 PM

I do not think HC is the problem think is the big canoli

head coach give me crazy ass todd
gm marty
owner of in the far east watching boys in shorts kicking balls
hey what ever keeps him out of football

crazycoffey 10-02-2012 10:29 PM

I like gruden and billick

DaneMcCloud 10-02-2012 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Psyko Tek (Post 8972142)
gm marty

What? The guy who was fired in multiple cities because he insisted on personnel control when he was clueless?

Mike ****ing Junkin. #5 overall. GREAT Pick, Marty!

Rausch 10-02-2012 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Psyko Tek (Post 8972142)
I do not think HC is the problem think is the big canoli

head coach give me crazy ass todd
gm marty

Full......retart...

http://i936.photobucket.com/albums/a...45388eab20.gif

crazycoffey 10-02-2012 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 8972263)

Soooooo, cp as SNAFU as always?

Rausch 10-04-2012 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaliforniaChief (Post 8971325)
Well said. We need to be the trend-setters. That's why neither Billick, Cowher, or Gruden can be the point man moving forward.

We could, but only if they fit our vision of what the owner (in a perfect world where Clark has a clear vision of what he want's) agrees...

buddha 10-04-2012 10:23 PM

I would love to have any of the three coaches initially mentioned.

BossChief 10-04-2012 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 8971365)
Why would anyone advocate hiring a guy that hasn't coached in five years or more?

Because of a few reasons

1) his defensive philosophy meshes PERFECTLY with the strengths of our defensive personnel.

2) he has a lot of ties to Pittsburgh and they have always had the formula for winning.

3) he knows it takes a franchise quarterback to win.

4) he has ties to KC and wouldn't need to completely overhaul the roster to make us competitive and if he gets a quarterback we could contend inside of 2 years.

DaneMcCloud 10-04-2012 11:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8978264)
Because of a few reasons

1) his defensive philosophy meshes PERFECTLY with the strengths of our defensive personnel.

2) he has a lot of ties to Pittsburgh and they have always had the formula for winning.

3) he knows it takes a franchise quarterback to win.

4) he has ties to KC and wouldn't need to completely overhaul the roster to make us competitive and if he gets a quarterback we could contend inside of 2 years.

Bullshit.

All of it.

Plus, he clearly has NO desire to coach again at age 55, so why drag him back in?

NJChiefsFan 10-04-2012 11:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 8978268)
Bullshit.

All of it.

Plus, he clearly has NO desire to coach again at age 55, so why drag him back in?

It's not like he always had an elite QB. I never got the impression he was always desperate or believed that it's all he needed.

Sorter 10-04-2012 11:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 8978268)
Bullshit.

All of it.

Plus, he clearly has NO desire to coach again at age 55, so why drag him back in?

Not all of it is bullshit.

1. Cowher's philosophy does mesh well, especially considering the personnel we have.

2. Valid.

3. Meh. He did play Kordell Stewart and Maddox

4. Definitely agree with this. Although, Cowher will likely overturn the roster due to change from 2 to 1-gap and from a regime change.


That being said, I still don't want Cowher unless he could steal Keith Butler away from Pittsburgh.

That for me, is the only way I could personally enjoy Cowher being here (success notwithstanding)

DaneMcCloud 10-04-2012 11:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 8978284)
Not all of it is bullshit.

1. Cowher's philosophy does mesh well, especially considering the personnel we have.

2. Valid.

3. Meh. He did play Kordell Stewart and Maddox

4. Definitely agree with this. Although, Cowher will likely overturn the roster due to change from 2 to 1-gap and from a regime change.


That being said, I still don't want Cowher unless he could steal Keith Butler away from Pittsburgh.

That for me, is the only way I could personally enjoy Cowher being here (success notwithstanding)

LMAO

Did Bill Walsh quit the year after he won his first Super Bowl?

Lombardi? Landry? Noll? Shanahan? Billick? McCarthy?

How about Holmgren? Flores? Belichick? Coughlin?

Do you "get it" or not?

DaneMcCloud 10-04-2012 11:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan (Post 8978283)
It's not like he always had an elite QB. I never got the impression he was always desperate or believed that it's all he needed.

Cowher dint believe in it, either.

Kent Graham, Mike Tomczack, Tommy Maddox, etc.

Sorter 10-05-2012 12:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 8978300)
LMAO

Did Bill Walsh quit the year after he won his first Super Bowl?

Lombardi? Landry? Noll? Shanahan? Billick? McCarthy?

How about Holmgren? Flores? Belichick? Coughlin?

Do you "get it" or not?

If you're trying to say that every human being has the same reasoning and motivations to continue in a difficult line of work that is taxing notbonly physically but mentally as well, IDK what to say to you. Besides the obvious fact that is is ignorant and incorrect.


I know plenty of people who are Olympic and NCAA champs who didn't compete and who didn't have the same level of motivation after winning a championship. Not every person is the same.


That being said, I DON'T WANT COWHER!

Sorter 10-05-2012 12:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 8978303)
Cowher dint believe in it, either.

Kent Graham, Mike Tomczack, Tommy Maddox, etc.

Totally. My main point against hiring Cowher.

DaneMcCloud 10-05-2012 12:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 8978307)
If you're trying to say that every human being has the same reasoning and motivations to continue in a difficult line of work that is taxing notbonly physically but mentally as well, IDK what to say to you. Besides the obvious fact that is is ignorant and incorrect.


I know plenty of people who are Olympic and NCAA champs who didn't compete and who didn't have the same level of motivation after winning a championship. Not every person is the same.


That being said, I DON'T WANT COWHER!

JFC. The guy hasn't coached since 2006.

2006.

Why defend the possibly of his hire?

kcxiv 10-05-2012 12:08 AM

yeah, Vermeil didnt coach for 20 ****ing years and came back and won in St Louis, for whatever reasons anyone wants to spin, he did it.

That being said, i dont want Cowher either, i really dont care who, if we dont get a qb, it all means nothing.

Sorter 10-05-2012 12:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 8978311)
JFC. The guy hasn't coached since 2006.

2006.

Why defend the possibly of his hire?

Because it is a MB and we deal in hypotheticals here. I like to hear others opinions and take the good and bad from all perspectives.

I agree with you Dane.

Personally, I couldn't justify hiring him, despite his accolades. Not only are our philosophical beliefs different but our backgrounds and evaluations processes are different (again, this is from the GM perspective)

However, worst case scenario, if Cowher somehow was hired, I think that him coming into our 3-4 personnel and his experiences as a head coach/in KC wouldn't serve as a hindrance.

DaneMcCloud 10-05-2012 12:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fruit Ninja (Post 8978317)
yeah, Vermeil didnt coach for 20 ****ing years and came back and won in St Louis, for whatever reasons anyone wants to spin, he did it.

That being said, i dont want Cowher either, i really dont care who, if we dont get a qb, it all means nothing.

Vermeil's record was shit. He was about to be fired after three years on the job.

John Shaw FORCED Mike Martz on him, took away his personnel decisions, signed Trent Green, traded for Marshall Faulk, drafted Torrey Holt and so on

The Chiefs situation isn't even remotely similar, nor is Cowher.

kcxiv 10-05-2012 12:17 AM

Again, he still did it for WHATEVER reasons you want to throw out there. He still had the passion to come back after that long and win. Hell, he even had the Chiefs at 13 and 3 after he left St Louis. Oh well.

Anyways, We all know its gonna be a ****ing Pioli buddy system hire if he's still around which he probably will as he has 1 more year left.

DaneMcCloud 10-05-2012 12:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fruit Ninja (Post 8978326)
Again, he still did it for WHATEVER reasons you want to throw out there. He still had the passion to come back after that long and win. Hell, he even had the Chiefs at 13 and 3 after he left St Louis.

His "passion" was hooking up his friends with final paydays

No playoff wins, one playoff appearance but worse, a roster in need of serious repair.

He ****ed the Chiefs bigger than Levy, Mackovic, Schottenheimer, Gunther and Edwards COMBINED.

chiefs1111 10-05-2012 01:26 AM

None of them

Predarat 10-05-2012 06:50 AM

Billick the Prick

htismaqe 10-05-2012 06:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 8978321)
Because it is a MB and we deal in hypotheticals here. I like to hear others opinions and take the good and bad from all perspectives.

I agree with you Dane.

Personally, I couldn't justify hiring him, despite his accolades. Not only are our philosophical beliefs different but our backgrounds and evaluations processes are different (again, this is from the GM perspective)

However, worst case scenario, if Cowher somehow was hired, I think that him coming into our 3-4 personnel and his experiences as a head coach/in KC wouldn't serve as a hindrance.

His having won a Super Bowl would be a hindrance though.

Unless you're suggesting Cowher is good enough to become the only coach in NFL history to win one with 2 different teams.

CaliforniaChief 10-06-2012 05:00 PM

I've changed my mind. I originally wanted Rob Ryan. I would still be ok with him. But I've decided I want someone else:

David Shaw.

The guy played WR at Stanford under Dennis Green and Bill Walsh.
His dad was a coach (in KC once).
He's been an Assistant Coach in the NFL for three teams.
He's coached under Jim Harbaugh.

He has a great track record of developing players, and would be perfect as a HC to develop a drafted franchise QB (he's been a QB coach).

To say his players are smart is a bit redundant as he coaches at Stanford.

Nonetheless, I think he'll be a helluva head coach in the NFL, and I'd love to see him in Kansas City. He looks good in red. (EDIT: And he just turned 40...perfect age/temperament)

Imon Yourside 10-06-2012 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Fish (Post 8970515)
Come on guys... think forward. Quit clinging to the past. It's a different game, and these guys were phased out of it for a reason. We need a new, fresh approach. We need a coach who will understand the future of the game of football, not what it was 15 years past.

There is really nothing new under the sun, we just need someone who can win despite the cheapass owner. I really don't want Cowher though, he had some bad teams in Pittsburgh. I would like to have Gruden and that's about it off of this short list.

Kylo Ren 10-06-2012 05:21 PM

Cowher or Gruden would bring instant creditility to KC and both would change the attitude of the team to lean and mean.

Bowser 10-06-2012 05:24 PM

What is the success rate of reaching the Super Bowl for retread coaches on their second or third team?

DaneMcCloud 10-06-2012 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John_Wayne (Post 8982796)
Cowher or Gruden would bring instant creditility to KC and both would change the attitude of the team to lean and mean.

Credibility? With whom? The fans?

:facepalm:

Yeah, great. It would be awesome if cHunt appeases the fans instead of hiring the best possible head coach and coaching staff.

ChiefsSuckBalls 10-06-2012 06:18 PM

LOL


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.